Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa

The objective of this study is to empirically examine the capital structure theories that can explain the capital structure choice made by the firms that are operating in China, India, and South Africa. The study tests the capital structure theories as a stand-alone basis as well as an integrated fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Kannadhasan, Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur, C.P. Gupta, Parikshit Charan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Cogent Economics & Finance
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1443369
id doaj-8c155b1bb2874d4faea7d2fbe14e12a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c155b1bb2874d4faea7d2fbe14e12a82021-02-18T13:53:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Economics & Finance2332-20392018-01-016110.1080/23322039.2018.14433691443369Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South AfricaM. Kannadhasan0Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur1C.P. Gupta2Parikshit Charan3Indian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC CampusIndian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC CampusUniversity of Delhi- South CampusIndian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC CampusThe objective of this study is to empirically examine the capital structure theories that can explain the capital structure choice made by the firms that are operating in China, India, and South Africa. The study tests the capital structure theories as a stand-alone basis as well as an integrated framework of nested models using advanced dynamic panel data methods with a data-set of 1,183 firms with 12,187 firm-year observations spanning the period 1999–2016. Findings suggest that the firms adjust toward target leverage very quickly and trade-off theory explains the firms’ capital structure choice better than pecking order theory in the stand-alone model as well as the model nesting these two theories. This study contributes to the empirical literature of capital structure in the following way. First, this study uses error correction framework as a general specification of the widely used partial adjustment model. Second, the study uses advanced panel data estimators to estimate partial adjustment model and error correction model. Finally, the different specifications are tested using a large data-set of firms in China, India, and South Africa that has not been done so far.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1443369capital structureerror correction modeltrade-off theorypecking order theorydynamic panel datapartial adjustment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Kannadhasan
Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur
C.P. Gupta
Parikshit Charan
spellingShingle M. Kannadhasan
Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur
C.P. Gupta
Parikshit Charan
Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa
Cogent Economics & Finance
capital structure
error correction model
trade-off theory
pecking order theory
dynamic panel data
partial adjustment
author_facet M. Kannadhasan
Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur
C.P. Gupta
Parikshit Charan
author_sort M. Kannadhasan
title Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa
title_short Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa
title_full Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa
title_fullStr Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa
title_sort testing capital structure theories using error correction models: evidence from china, india, and south africa
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Economics & Finance
issn 2332-2039
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The objective of this study is to empirically examine the capital structure theories that can explain the capital structure choice made by the firms that are operating in China, India, and South Africa. The study tests the capital structure theories as a stand-alone basis as well as an integrated framework of nested models using advanced dynamic panel data methods with a data-set of 1,183 firms with 12,187 firm-year observations spanning the period 1999–2016. Findings suggest that the firms adjust toward target leverage very quickly and trade-off theory explains the firms’ capital structure choice better than pecking order theory in the stand-alone model as well as the model nesting these two theories. This study contributes to the empirical literature of capital structure in the following way. First, this study uses error correction framework as a general specification of the widely used partial adjustment model. Second, the study uses advanced panel data estimators to estimate partial adjustment model and error correction model. Finally, the different specifications are tested using a large data-set of firms in China, India, and South Africa that has not been done so far.
topic capital structure
error correction model
trade-off theory
pecking order theory
dynamic panel data
partial adjustment
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1443369
work_keys_str_mv AT mkannadhasan testingcapitalstructuretheoriesusingerrorcorrectionmodelsevidencefromchinaindiaandsouthafrica
AT bhanupratapsinghthakur testingcapitalstructuretheoriesusingerrorcorrectionmodelsevidencefromchinaindiaandsouthafrica
AT cpgupta testingcapitalstructuretheoriesusingerrorcorrectionmodelsevidencefromchinaindiaandsouthafrica
AT parikshitcharan testingcapitalstructuretheoriesusingerrorcorrectionmodelsevidencefromchinaindiaandsouthafrica
_version_ 1724262883156557824