Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa
The objective of this study is to empirically examine the capital structure theories that can explain the capital structure choice made by the firms that are operating in China, India, and South Africa. The study tests the capital structure theories as a stand-alone basis as well as an integrated fr...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Cogent Economics & Finance |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1443369 |
id |
doaj-8c155b1bb2874d4faea7d2fbe14e12a8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8c155b1bb2874d4faea7d2fbe14e12a82021-02-18T13:53:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Economics & Finance2332-20392018-01-016110.1080/23322039.2018.14433691443369Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South AfricaM. Kannadhasan0Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur1C.P. Gupta2Parikshit Charan3Indian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC CampusIndian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC CampusUniversity of Delhi- South CampusIndian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC CampusThe objective of this study is to empirically examine the capital structure theories that can explain the capital structure choice made by the firms that are operating in China, India, and South Africa. The study tests the capital structure theories as a stand-alone basis as well as an integrated framework of nested models using advanced dynamic panel data methods with a data-set of 1,183 firms with 12,187 firm-year observations spanning the period 1999–2016. Findings suggest that the firms adjust toward target leverage very quickly and trade-off theory explains the firms’ capital structure choice better than pecking order theory in the stand-alone model as well as the model nesting these two theories. This study contributes to the empirical literature of capital structure in the following way. First, this study uses error correction framework as a general specification of the widely used partial adjustment model. Second, the study uses advanced panel data estimators to estimate partial adjustment model and error correction model. Finally, the different specifications are tested using a large data-set of firms in China, India, and South Africa that has not been done so far.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1443369capital structureerror correction modeltrade-off theorypecking order theorydynamic panel datapartial adjustment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Kannadhasan Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur C.P. Gupta Parikshit Charan |
spellingShingle |
M. Kannadhasan Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur C.P. Gupta Parikshit Charan Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa Cogent Economics & Finance capital structure error correction model trade-off theory pecking order theory dynamic panel data partial adjustment |
author_facet |
M. Kannadhasan Bhanu Pratap Singh Thakur C.P. Gupta Parikshit Charan |
author_sort |
M. Kannadhasan |
title |
Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa |
title_short |
Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa |
title_full |
Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa |
title_fullStr |
Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Testing capital structure theories using error correction models: Evidence from China, India, and South Africa |
title_sort |
testing capital structure theories using error correction models: evidence from china, india, and south africa |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Cogent Economics & Finance |
issn |
2332-2039 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
The objective of this study is to empirically examine the capital structure theories that can explain the capital structure choice made by the firms that are operating in China, India, and South Africa. The study tests the capital structure theories as a stand-alone basis as well as an integrated framework of nested models using advanced dynamic panel data methods with a data-set of 1,183 firms with 12,187 firm-year observations spanning the period 1999–2016. Findings suggest that the firms adjust toward target leverage very quickly and trade-off theory explains the firms’ capital structure choice better than pecking order theory in the stand-alone model as well as the model nesting these two theories. This study contributes to the empirical literature of capital structure in the following way. First, this study uses error correction framework as a general specification of the widely used partial adjustment model. Second, the study uses advanced panel data estimators to estimate partial adjustment model and error correction model. Finally, the different specifications are tested using a large data-set of firms in China, India, and South Africa that has not been done so far. |
topic |
capital structure error correction model trade-off theory pecking order theory dynamic panel data partial adjustment |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1443369 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mkannadhasan testingcapitalstructuretheoriesusingerrorcorrectionmodelsevidencefromchinaindiaandsouthafrica AT bhanupratapsinghthakur testingcapitalstructuretheoriesusingerrorcorrectionmodelsevidencefromchinaindiaandsouthafrica AT cpgupta testingcapitalstructuretheoriesusingerrorcorrectionmodelsevidencefromchinaindiaandsouthafrica AT parikshitcharan testingcapitalstructuretheoriesusingerrorcorrectionmodelsevidencefromchinaindiaandsouthafrica |
_version_ |
1724262883156557824 |