Evaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmography
Abstract Whole-body plethysmography (WBP) is an established method to determine physiological parameters and pathophysiological alteration of breathing in animals and animal models of a variety of diseases. Although frequently used, there is ongoing debate about what exactly is measured by whole-bod...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96355-y |
id |
doaj-8c0777891b084aa79e14710b32cb0085 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8c0777891b084aa79e14710b32cb00852021-08-29T11:24:55ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-08-0111111410.1038/s41598-021-96355-yEvaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmographySwen Hülsmann0Amara Khan1Liya Hagos2Martin Hindermann3Torsten Nägel4Christian Dullin5Clinic for Anesthesiology, University Medical CenterDepartment of Translational Molecular Imaging, Max-Plank-Institute of Experimental MedicineClinic for Anesthesiology, University Medical CenterDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Max-Plank-Institute of Experimental MedicineInstitute of Neuro- and Sensory Physiology, University Medical CenterInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical CenterAbstract Whole-body plethysmography (WBP) is an established method to determine physiological parameters and pathophysiological alteration of breathing in animals and animal models of a variety of diseases. Although frequently used, there is ongoing debate about what exactly is measured by whole-body-plethysmography and how reliable the data derived from this method are. Here, we designed an artificial lung model that enables a thorough evaluation of different predictions about and around whole-body plethysmography. Using our lung model, we confirmed that during WBP two components contribute to the pressure changes detected in the chamber: (1) the increase in the pressure due to heating and moistening of the air during inspiration, termed conditioning; (2) changes in the chamber pressure that depend on airway resistance. Both components overlap and contribute to the temporal pressure-profile measured in the chamber or across the wall of the chamber, respectively. Our data showed that a precise measurement of the breathing volume appears to be hindered by at least two factors: (1) the unknown relative contribution of each of these two components; (2) not only the air in the inspired volume is conditioned during inspiration, but also air within the residual volume and dead space that is recruited during inspiration. Moreover, our data suggest that the expiratory negative pressure peak that is used to determine the enhanced pause (Penh) parameter is not a measure for airway resistance as such but rather a consequence of the animal’s response to the airway resistance, using forced or active expiration to overcome the resistance by a higher thoracic pressure.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96355-y |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Swen Hülsmann Amara Khan Liya Hagos Martin Hindermann Torsten Nägel Christian Dullin |
spellingShingle |
Swen Hülsmann Amara Khan Liya Hagos Martin Hindermann Torsten Nägel Christian Dullin Evaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmography Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Swen Hülsmann Amara Khan Liya Hagos Martin Hindermann Torsten Nägel Christian Dullin |
author_sort |
Swen Hülsmann |
title |
Evaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmography |
title_short |
Evaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmography |
title_full |
Evaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmography |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmography |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmography |
title_sort |
evaluation of a mechanical lung model to test small animal whole body plethysmography |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Whole-body plethysmography (WBP) is an established method to determine physiological parameters and pathophysiological alteration of breathing in animals and animal models of a variety of diseases. Although frequently used, there is ongoing debate about what exactly is measured by whole-body-plethysmography and how reliable the data derived from this method are. Here, we designed an artificial lung model that enables a thorough evaluation of different predictions about and around whole-body plethysmography. Using our lung model, we confirmed that during WBP two components contribute to the pressure changes detected in the chamber: (1) the increase in the pressure due to heating and moistening of the air during inspiration, termed conditioning; (2) changes in the chamber pressure that depend on airway resistance. Both components overlap and contribute to the temporal pressure-profile measured in the chamber or across the wall of the chamber, respectively. Our data showed that a precise measurement of the breathing volume appears to be hindered by at least two factors: (1) the unknown relative contribution of each of these two components; (2) not only the air in the inspired volume is conditioned during inspiration, but also air within the residual volume and dead space that is recruited during inspiration. Moreover, our data suggest that the expiratory negative pressure peak that is used to determine the enhanced pause (Penh) parameter is not a measure for airway resistance as such but rather a consequence of the animal’s response to the airway resistance, using forced or active expiration to overcome the resistance by a higher thoracic pressure. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96355-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT swenhulsmann evaluationofamechanicallungmodeltotestsmallanimalwholebodyplethysmography AT amarakhan evaluationofamechanicallungmodeltotestsmallanimalwholebodyplethysmography AT liyahagos evaluationofamechanicallungmodeltotestsmallanimalwholebodyplethysmography AT martinhindermann evaluationofamechanicallungmodeltotestsmallanimalwholebodyplethysmography AT torstennagel evaluationofamechanicallungmodeltotestsmallanimalwholebodyplethysmography AT christiandullin evaluationofamechanicallungmodeltotestsmallanimalwholebodyplethysmography |
_version_ |
1721186831308947456 |