Automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?

<p class="FreeForm"><span lang="EN-US">It is generally excepted that changes in the money supply exert a profound influence on the economic process. The same goes for the resulting conclusion that the creation of money cannot be left to private initiative. These two p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. SCHNEIDER
Format: Article
Language:Italian
Published: Associazione Economia civile 2014-08-01
Series:Moneta e Credito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/monetaecredito/article/view/12539
id doaj-8c030deb054e4aa893c83ecba42f3556
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c030deb054e4aa893c83ecba42f35562020-11-24T22:13:53ZitaAssociazione Economia civileMoneta e Credito2037-36512014-08-01239012206Automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?E. SCHNEIDER<p class="FreeForm"><span lang="EN-US">It is generally excepted that changes in the money supply exert a profound influence on the economic process. The same goes for the resulting conclusion that the creation of money cannot be left to private initiative. These two propositions  pose the questions: (a) what will be the economic effects of a given change in the money supply? (b) how has the money supply to be manipulated, if a specific aim is to be achieved? The present paper deals with the latter of these two questions. The author criticises Milton Friedman’s rule for the regulation of money supply aimed at price stabilisation in which matters are no longer left to the central bank’s discretion but are governed by a process of automation. This rule is based on the assumption of a constant or approximately constant income velocity which, according to the author, is not confirmed by the facts. It is argued that Milton’s conclusions are derived from statistical findings alone, however, the closest correlation between variables can explain nothing about causal relations between the variables or changes of variables.</span></p><p class="FreeForm"><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></p><p class="FreeForm"><span lang="EN-US">JEL: E52, E51</span></p>http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/monetaecredito/article/view/12539Monetary policy, Friedman, money supply, price stabilisation, automation, income velocity
collection DOAJ
language Italian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. SCHNEIDER
spellingShingle E. SCHNEIDER
Automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?
Moneta e Credito
Monetary policy, Friedman, money supply, price stabilisation, automation, income velocity
author_facet E. SCHNEIDER
author_sort E. SCHNEIDER
title Automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?
title_short Automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?
title_full Automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?
title_fullStr Automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?
title_full_unstemmed Automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?
title_sort automatismo o discrezionalità nella politica monetaria?
publisher Associazione Economia civile
series Moneta e Credito
issn 2037-3651
publishDate 2014-08-01
description <p class="FreeForm"><span lang="EN-US">It is generally excepted that changes in the money supply exert a profound influence on the economic process. The same goes for the resulting conclusion that the creation of money cannot be left to private initiative. These two propositions  pose the questions: (a) what will be the economic effects of a given change in the money supply? (b) how has the money supply to be manipulated, if a specific aim is to be achieved? The present paper deals with the latter of these two questions. The author criticises Milton Friedman’s rule for the regulation of money supply aimed at price stabilisation in which matters are no longer left to the central bank’s discretion but are governed by a process of automation. This rule is based on the assumption of a constant or approximately constant income velocity which, according to the author, is not confirmed by the facts. It is argued that Milton’s conclusions are derived from statistical findings alone, however, the closest correlation between variables can explain nothing about causal relations between the variables or changes of variables.</span></p><p class="FreeForm"><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></p><p class="FreeForm"><span lang="EN-US">JEL: E52, E51</span></p>
topic Monetary policy, Friedman, money supply, price stabilisation, automation, income velocity
url http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/monetaecredito/article/view/12539
work_keys_str_mv AT eschneider automatismoodiscrezionalitanellapoliticamonetaria
_version_ 1725799588506370048