Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

Chronic low back pain is a debilitating condition with a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have strong analgesic effects, as shown in both animal models of pain and in human beings. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel format study to inves...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duarte Machado, Aditya Kumar, Bahman Jabbari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-12-01
Series:Toxins
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/8/12/374
id doaj-8bfac751a7e149cca03ae1da78e250d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8bfac751a7e149cca03ae1da78e250d92020-11-24T23:48:17ZengMDPI AGToxins2072-66512016-12-0181237410.3390/toxins8120374toxins8120374Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back PainDuarte Machado0Aditya Kumar1Bahman Jabbari2Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USADepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USADepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USAChronic low back pain is a debilitating condition with a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have strong analgesic effects, as shown in both animal models of pain and in human beings. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel format study to investigate the efficacy of abobotulinum toxin A (aboA) in chronic low back pain was conducted. The study cohort consisted of 18 patients who received 100 units of aboA into each of the five lumbar extensor spinae muscles unilaterally or bilaterally (total dose 500 to 1000 units), and 19 who received normal saline of the same volume. The level of pain and quality of life were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and three questionnaires including the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBPDQ). Patients’ perception of improvement was recorded via patient global impression of change (PGIC). The primary outcome measure, the proportion of responders with VAS of <4 at 6 weeks, was not met, but the data was significantly in favor of aboA at 4 weeks (p = 0.008). The total Oswestry score representing quality of life improved in the aboA group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0448). Moreover, significantly more patients reported their low back pain as “much improved” in the abobotulinum toxin A group (0.0293).http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/8/12/374low back painabobotulinum toxin Abotulinum neurotoxinrandomized controlled trial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Duarte Machado
Aditya Kumar
Bahman Jabbari
spellingShingle Duarte Machado
Aditya Kumar
Bahman Jabbari
Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
Toxins
low back pain
abobotulinum toxin A
botulinum neurotoxin
randomized controlled trial
author_facet Duarte Machado
Aditya Kumar
Bahman Jabbari
author_sort Duarte Machado
title Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
title_short Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
title_fullStr Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
title_sort abobotulinum toxin a in the treatment of chronic low back pain
publisher MDPI AG
series Toxins
issn 2072-6651
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Chronic low back pain is a debilitating condition with a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have strong analgesic effects, as shown in both animal models of pain and in human beings. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel format study to investigate the efficacy of abobotulinum toxin A (aboA) in chronic low back pain was conducted. The study cohort consisted of 18 patients who received 100 units of aboA into each of the five lumbar extensor spinae muscles unilaterally or bilaterally (total dose 500 to 1000 units), and 19 who received normal saline of the same volume. The level of pain and quality of life were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and three questionnaires including the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBPDQ). Patients’ perception of improvement was recorded via patient global impression of change (PGIC). The primary outcome measure, the proportion of responders with VAS of <4 at 6 weeks, was not met, but the data was significantly in favor of aboA at 4 weeks (p = 0.008). The total Oswestry score representing quality of life improved in the aboA group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0448). Moreover, significantly more patients reported their low back pain as “much improved” in the abobotulinum toxin A group (0.0293).
topic low back pain
abobotulinum toxin A
botulinum neurotoxin
randomized controlled trial
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/8/12/374
work_keys_str_mv AT duartemachado abobotulinumtoxinainthetreatmentofchroniclowbackpain
AT adityakumar abobotulinumtoxinainthetreatmentofchroniclowbackpain
AT bahmanjabbari abobotulinumtoxinainthetreatmentofchroniclowbackpain
_version_ 1725486289951653888