Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic low back pain is a debilitating condition with a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have strong analgesic effects, as shown in both animal models of pain and in human beings. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel format study to inves...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Toxins |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/8/12/374 |
id |
doaj-8bfac751a7e149cca03ae1da78e250d9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8bfac751a7e149cca03ae1da78e250d92020-11-24T23:48:17ZengMDPI AGToxins2072-66512016-12-0181237410.3390/toxins8120374toxins8120374Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back PainDuarte Machado0Aditya Kumar1Bahman Jabbari2Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USADepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USADepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USAChronic low back pain is a debilitating condition with a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have strong analgesic effects, as shown in both animal models of pain and in human beings. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel format study to investigate the efficacy of abobotulinum toxin A (aboA) in chronic low back pain was conducted. The study cohort consisted of 18 patients who received 100 units of aboA into each of the five lumbar extensor spinae muscles unilaterally or bilaterally (total dose 500 to 1000 units), and 19 who received normal saline of the same volume. The level of pain and quality of life were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and three questionnaires including the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBPDQ). Patients’ perception of improvement was recorded via patient global impression of change (PGIC). The primary outcome measure, the proportion of responders with VAS of <4 at 6 weeks, was not met, but the data was significantly in favor of aboA at 4 weeks (p = 0.008). The total Oswestry score representing quality of life improved in the aboA group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0448). Moreover, significantly more patients reported their low back pain as “much improved” in the abobotulinum toxin A group (0.0293).http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/8/12/374low back painabobotulinum toxin Abotulinum neurotoxinrandomized controlled trial |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Duarte Machado Aditya Kumar Bahman Jabbari |
spellingShingle |
Duarte Machado Aditya Kumar Bahman Jabbari Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain Toxins low back pain abobotulinum toxin A botulinum neurotoxin randomized controlled trial |
author_facet |
Duarte Machado Aditya Kumar Bahman Jabbari |
author_sort |
Duarte Machado |
title |
Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_short |
Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_full |
Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_fullStr |
Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_sort |
abobotulinum toxin a in the treatment of chronic low back pain |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Toxins |
issn |
2072-6651 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Chronic low back pain is a debilitating condition with a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have strong analgesic effects, as shown in both animal models of pain and in human beings. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel format study to investigate the efficacy of abobotulinum toxin A (aboA) in chronic low back pain was conducted. The study cohort consisted of 18 patients who received 100 units of aboA into each of the five lumbar extensor spinae muscles unilaterally or bilaterally (total dose 500 to 1000 units), and 19 who received normal saline of the same volume. The level of pain and quality of life were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and three questionnaires including the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBPDQ). Patients’ perception of improvement was recorded via patient global impression of change (PGIC). The primary outcome measure, the proportion of responders with VAS of <4 at 6 weeks, was not met, but the data was significantly in favor of aboA at 4 weeks (p = 0.008). The total Oswestry score representing quality of life improved in the aboA group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0448). Moreover, significantly more patients reported their low back pain as “much improved” in the abobotulinum toxin A group (0.0293). |
topic |
low back pain abobotulinum toxin A botulinum neurotoxin randomized controlled trial |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/8/12/374 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT duartemachado abobotulinumtoxinainthetreatmentofchroniclowbackpain AT adityakumar abobotulinumtoxinainthetreatmentofchroniclowbackpain AT bahmanjabbari abobotulinumtoxinainthetreatmentofchroniclowbackpain |
_version_ |
1725486289951653888 |