Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and Prognosis

In 2012, the new, revised Forest Code was established as the legal and regulatory framework for Brazilian forests. Though illegal logging has continued, frames about Brazil's forest policy and management have changed since that time. While until 2010 the successful implementation of forest poli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela Kleinschmit, Rafaella Ferraz Ziegert, Laura Walther
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2021.624072/full
id doaj-8be2aae670b14b25a1c4cececdcaedb4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8be2aae670b14b25a1c4cececdcaedb42021-05-25T06:30:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Forests and Global Change2624-893X2021-05-01410.3389/ffgc.2021.624072624072Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and PrognosisDaniela KleinschmitRafaella Ferraz ZiegertLaura WaltherIn 2012, the new, revised Forest Code was established as the legal and regulatory framework for Brazilian forests. Though illegal logging has continued, frames about Brazil's forest policy and management have changed since that time. While until 2010 the successful implementation of forest policies and the resulting decline in deforestation rates were there for all to see and appreciate, the increase in the deforestation rate since then has become the focus of international criticism. With the help of a structured review of international scientific literature, newspaper articles, and programmes initiated by non-governmental organizations' (NGO) and international organizations' (IO), this paper aims to analyse the frames of illegal logging and its governance responses in Brazil since 2012. The review is guided by the framework of diagnostic (What is the problem? Who is to blame?) and prognostic framing (proposed policy and governance solutions). The main findings revealed a master frame of environmental justice that combines injustice toward indigenous people with the victimization of forest and environment at large. Embedded in this master frame, specific frames that follow the institutional logic of the single policy discourses have been identified. Finally, the results show a strong national focus of governance with continued emphasis on command and control instruments.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2021.624072/fullillegal loggingBrazildeforestationmaster frameenvironmental justicecollective action frame
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniela Kleinschmit
Rafaella Ferraz Ziegert
Laura Walther
spellingShingle Daniela Kleinschmit
Rafaella Ferraz Ziegert
Laura Walther
Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and Prognosis
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
illegal logging
Brazil
deforestation
master frame
environmental justice
collective action frame
author_facet Daniela Kleinschmit
Rafaella Ferraz Ziegert
Laura Walther
author_sort Daniela Kleinschmit
title Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and Prognosis
title_short Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and Prognosis
title_full Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and Prognosis
title_fullStr Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and Prognosis
title_full_unstemmed Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and Prognosis
title_sort framing illegal logging and its governance responses in brazil – a structured review of diagnosis and prognosis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
issn 2624-893X
publishDate 2021-05-01
description In 2012, the new, revised Forest Code was established as the legal and regulatory framework for Brazilian forests. Though illegal logging has continued, frames about Brazil's forest policy and management have changed since that time. While until 2010 the successful implementation of forest policies and the resulting decline in deforestation rates were there for all to see and appreciate, the increase in the deforestation rate since then has become the focus of international criticism. With the help of a structured review of international scientific literature, newspaper articles, and programmes initiated by non-governmental organizations' (NGO) and international organizations' (IO), this paper aims to analyse the frames of illegal logging and its governance responses in Brazil since 2012. The review is guided by the framework of diagnostic (What is the problem? Who is to blame?) and prognostic framing (proposed policy and governance solutions). The main findings revealed a master frame of environmental justice that combines injustice toward indigenous people with the victimization of forest and environment at large. Embedded in this master frame, specific frames that follow the institutional logic of the single policy discourses have been identified. Finally, the results show a strong national focus of governance with continued emphasis on command and control instruments.
topic illegal logging
Brazil
deforestation
master frame
environmental justice
collective action frame
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2021.624072/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielakleinschmit framingillegallogginganditsgovernanceresponsesinbrazilastructuredreviewofdiagnosisandprognosis
AT rafaellaferrazziegert framingillegallogginganditsgovernanceresponsesinbrazilastructuredreviewofdiagnosisandprognosis
AT laurawalther framingillegallogginganditsgovernanceresponsesinbrazilastructuredreviewofdiagnosisandprognosis
_version_ 1721427890256478208