Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: Rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLS
Basic chemometric methods for making empirical regression models for QSPR/QSAR are briefly described from a user's point of view. Emphasis is given to PLS regression, simple variable selection and a careful and cautious evaluation of the performance of PLS models by repeated double cross valida...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2013-02-01
|
Series: | Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.sfu.ca/rncsb/index.php/csbj/article/view/csbj.201302007 |
id |
doaj-8bca0619c52042cb89b4192bed1c1907 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8bca0619c52042cb89b4192bed1c19072020-11-24T23:47:31ZengElsevierComputational and Structural Biotechnology Journal2001-03702013-02-0156e201302007Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: Rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLSKurt VarmuzaPeter FilzmoserMatthias DehmerBasic chemometric methods for making empirical regression models for QSPR/QSAR are briefly described from a user's point of view. Emphasis is given to PLS regression, simple variable selection and a careful and cautious evaluation of the performance of PLS models by repeated double cross validation (rdCV). A demonstration example is worked out for QSPR models that predict gas chromatographic retention indices (values between 197 and 504 units) of 209 polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC) from molecular descriptors generated by Dragon software. Most favorable models were obtained from data sets containing also descriptors from 3D structures with all H-atoms (computed by Corina software), using stepwise variable selection (reducing 2688 descriptors to a subset of 22). The final QSPR model has typical prediction errors for the retention index of +12 units (95% tolerance interval, for test set objects). Programs and data are provided as supplementary material for the open source R software environment.http://journals.sfu.ca/rncsb/index.php/csbj/article/view/csbj.201302007molecular descriptorsPLSvariable selectioncross validationsoftware R |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kurt Varmuza Peter Filzmoser Matthias Dehmer |
spellingShingle |
Kurt Varmuza Peter Filzmoser Matthias Dehmer Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: Rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLS Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal molecular descriptors PLS variable selection cross validation software R |
author_facet |
Kurt Varmuza Peter Filzmoser Matthias Dehmer |
author_sort |
Kurt Varmuza |
title |
Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: Rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLS |
title_short |
Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: Rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLS |
title_full |
Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: Rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLS |
title_fullStr |
Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: Rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: Rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLS |
title_sort |
multivariate linear qspr/qsar models: rigorous evaluation of variable selection for pls |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal |
issn |
2001-0370 |
publishDate |
2013-02-01 |
description |
Basic chemometric methods for making empirical regression models for QSPR/QSAR are briefly described from a user's point of view. Emphasis is given to PLS regression, simple variable selection and a careful and cautious evaluation of the performance of PLS models by repeated double cross validation (rdCV). A demonstration example is worked out for QSPR models that predict gas chromatographic retention indices (values between 197 and 504 units) of 209 polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC) from molecular descriptors generated by Dragon software. Most favorable models were obtained from data sets containing also descriptors from 3D structures with all H-atoms (computed by Corina software), using stepwise variable selection (reducing 2688 descriptors to a subset of 22). The final QSPR model has typical prediction errors for the retention index of +12 units (95% tolerance interval, for test set objects). Programs and data are provided as supplementary material for the open source R software environment. |
topic |
molecular descriptors PLS variable selection cross validation software R |
url |
http://journals.sfu.ca/rncsb/index.php/csbj/article/view/csbj.201302007 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kurtvarmuza multivariatelinearqsprqsarmodelsrigorousevaluationofvariableselectionforpls AT peterfilzmoser multivariatelinearqsprqsarmodelsrigorousevaluationofvariableselectionforpls AT matthiasdehmer multivariatelinearqsprqsarmodelsrigorousevaluationofvariableselectionforpls |
_version_ |
1725489366505095168 |