Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives

In his burgeoning body of film theoretical work the French philosopher Jacques Rancière repeatedly turns to some canonical films by Neorealist pioneer Roberto Rossellini. Not simply retreading tired motifs of Neorealism, Rancière’s comments offer some profound new insights, revolutionising prior per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Harvey-Davitt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam University Press 2014-01-01
Series:NECSUS : European journal of media studies
Online Access:https://www.necsus-ejms.org/test/disputing-rossellini-three-french-perspectives/
id doaj-8bc56f818353459cb6cc4d0209c645d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8bc56f818353459cb6cc4d0209c645d92020-11-25T03:43:54ZengAmsterdam University PressNECSUS : European journal of media studies2213-02172014-01-0132638010.5117/NECSUS2014.2.HARVDisputing Rossellini: Three French perspectivesJames Harvey-DavittIn his burgeoning body of film theoretical work the French philosopher Jacques Rancière repeatedly turns to some canonical films by Neorealist pioneer Roberto Rossellini. Not simply retreading tired motifs of Neorealism, Rancière’s comments offer some profound new insights, revolutionising prior perspectives on Rossellini. In this article I shall put Rancière’s perspective into dialogue with two of the most significant of these perspectives: André Bazin’s and Gilles Deleuze’s. In doing so I shall claim that Rancière’s approach departs radically from the canonised, standardised Neorealist conception of Rossellini. Instead, I wish to claim that he describes a modernist artist primarily concerned with aesthetic clashes. In doing so I shall contemplate how the meaning of these films has evolved since the era of their contemporary reception, demonstrating the congruence and disparity between these three disparate approaches.https://www.necsus-ejms.org/test/disputing-rossellini-three-french-perspectives/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Harvey-Davitt
spellingShingle James Harvey-Davitt
Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives
NECSUS : European journal of media studies
author_facet James Harvey-Davitt
author_sort James Harvey-Davitt
title Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives
title_short Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives
title_full Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives
title_fullStr Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Disputing Rossellini: Three French perspectives
title_sort disputing rossellini: three french perspectives
publisher Amsterdam University Press
series NECSUS : European journal of media studies
issn 2213-0217
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In his burgeoning body of film theoretical work the French philosopher Jacques Rancière repeatedly turns to some canonical films by Neorealist pioneer Roberto Rossellini. Not simply retreading tired motifs of Neorealism, Rancière’s comments offer some profound new insights, revolutionising prior perspectives on Rossellini. In this article I shall put Rancière’s perspective into dialogue with two of the most significant of these perspectives: André Bazin’s and Gilles Deleuze’s. In doing so I shall claim that Rancière’s approach departs radically from the canonised, standardised Neorealist conception of Rossellini. Instead, I wish to claim that he describes a modernist artist primarily concerned with aesthetic clashes. In doing so I shall contemplate how the meaning of these films has evolved since the era of their contemporary reception, demonstrating the congruence and disparity between these three disparate approaches.
url https://www.necsus-ejms.org/test/disputing-rossellini-three-french-perspectives/
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesharveydavitt disputingrossellinithreefrenchperspectives
_version_ 1724517583179218944