A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation

Background The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Field, Dominica Abo, Louis Samiak, Mafu Vila, Georgina Dove, Alex Rosewell, Sally Nathan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018-10-01
Series:International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3505_f460c4c948cbb7fb8d512e2a2c9f3501.pdf
id doaj-8bb70c2245a54d16b2908e584eddba87
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8bb70c2245a54d16b2908e584eddba872020-11-24T21:50:10ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392018-10-0171092393310.15171/IJHPM.2018.50A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods EvaluationEmma Field0Dominica Abo1Louis Samiak2Mafu Vila3Georgina Dove4Alex Rosewell5Sally Nathan6Global and Tropical Health, Menzies School of Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaAbt Associates, Port Moresby, Papua New GuineaUniversity of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby, Papua New GuineaAbt Associates, Port Moresby, Papua New GuineaAbt Associates, Brisbane, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaBackground The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing health service providers to improve service delivery using existing government systems, where possible, and aligns with national policies, plans and strategies. A midline evaluation was conducted to determine changes in health service delivery since commencement of the Health Program. Methods A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken mid-way through implementation of the Health Program, including a pre/post analysis of health service delivery indicators, semi-structured interviews with health workers and assessment of health facility equipment and infrastructure. Results Improvements in many of the long-term expected outcomes of the Health Program were observed when compared to the pre-program period. The number of outpatient visits per person per year and number of outreach clinics per 1000 children under 5 years increased by 15% and 189% respectively (P < .001). Increases in vaccination coverage for infants aged P < .001) and 75% for 1st dose Sabin (P < .001), 30% for 3rd dose pentavalent (P < .001) and 26% for measles vaccination (P < .001). Family planning coverage remained at similar levels (increasing 5%, P = .095) and antenatal care coverage increased by 26% (P < .001). Supervised deliveries coverage declined by 32% (P < .001), a continuation of the pre-Program trend. The proportion of facilities with standard equipment items, transport and lighting increased. Health worker training, in particular obstetric training, was most commonly cited by health workers as leading to improved services. Conclusion Following implementation, substantial improvements in health service delivery indicators were observed in the Health Program area as compared with pre-program period and the stagnating or declining national performance. This model could be considered for similar contexts where existing health service providers require external assistance to provide basic health services to the community.http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3505_f460c4c948cbb7fb8d512e2a2c9f3501.pdfPartnershipService DeliveryMonitoring and EvaluationPapua New Guinea
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emma Field
Dominica Abo
Louis Samiak
Mafu Vila
Georgina Dove
Alex Rosewell
Sally Nathan
spellingShingle Emma Field
Dominica Abo
Louis Samiak
Mafu Vila
Georgina Dove
Alex Rosewell
Sally Nathan
A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Partnership
Service Delivery
Monitoring and Evaluation
Papua New Guinea
author_facet Emma Field
Dominica Abo
Louis Samiak
Mafu Vila
Georgina Dove
Alex Rosewell
Sally Nathan
author_sort Emma Field
title A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_short A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_full A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_fullStr A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_sort partnership model for improving service delivery in remote papua new guinea: a mixed methods evaluation
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
series International Journal of Health Policy and Management
issn 2322-5939
2322-5939
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Background The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing health service providers to improve service delivery using existing government systems, where possible, and aligns with national policies, plans and strategies. A midline evaluation was conducted to determine changes in health service delivery since commencement of the Health Program. Methods A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken mid-way through implementation of the Health Program, including a pre/post analysis of health service delivery indicators, semi-structured interviews with health workers and assessment of health facility equipment and infrastructure. Results Improvements in many of the long-term expected outcomes of the Health Program were observed when compared to the pre-program period. The number of outpatient visits per person per year and number of outreach clinics per 1000 children under 5 years increased by 15% and 189% respectively (P < .001). Increases in vaccination coverage for infants aged P < .001) and 75% for 1st dose Sabin (P < .001), 30% for 3rd dose pentavalent (P < .001) and 26% for measles vaccination (P < .001). Family planning coverage remained at similar levels (increasing 5%, P = .095) and antenatal care coverage increased by 26% (P < .001). Supervised deliveries coverage declined by 32% (P < .001), a continuation of the pre-Program trend. The proportion of facilities with standard equipment items, transport and lighting increased. Health worker training, in particular obstetric training, was most commonly cited by health workers as leading to improved services. Conclusion Following implementation, substantial improvements in health service delivery indicators were observed in the Health Program area as compared with pre-program period and the stagnating or declining national performance. This model could be considered for similar contexts where existing health service providers require external assistance to provide basic health services to the community.
topic Partnership
Service Delivery
Monitoring and Evaluation
Papua New Guinea
url http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3505_f460c4c948cbb7fb8d512e2a2c9f3501.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT emmafield apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT dominicaabo apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT louissamiak apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT mafuvila apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT georginadove apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT alexrosewell apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT sallynathan apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT emmafield partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT dominicaabo partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT louissamiak partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT mafuvila partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT georginadove partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT alexrosewell partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT sallynathan partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
_version_ 1725884869036212224