A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
Background The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2018-10-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3505_f460c4c948cbb7fb8d512e2a2c9f3501.pdf |
id |
doaj-8bb70c2245a54d16b2908e584eddba87 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8bb70c2245a54d16b2908e584eddba872020-11-24T21:50:10ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392018-10-0171092393310.15171/IJHPM.2018.50A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods EvaluationEmma Field0Dominica Abo1Louis Samiak2Mafu Vila3Georgina Dove4Alex Rosewell5Sally Nathan6Global and Tropical Health, Menzies School of Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaAbt Associates, Port Moresby, Papua New GuineaUniversity of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby, Papua New GuineaAbt Associates, Port Moresby, Papua New GuineaAbt Associates, Brisbane, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaBackground The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing health service providers to improve service delivery using existing government systems, where possible, and aligns with national policies, plans and strategies. A midline evaluation was conducted to determine changes in health service delivery since commencement of the Health Program. Methods A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken mid-way through implementation of the Health Program, including a pre/post analysis of health service delivery indicators, semi-structured interviews with health workers and assessment of health facility equipment and infrastructure. Results Improvements in many of the long-term expected outcomes of the Health Program were observed when compared to the pre-program period. The number of outpatient visits per person per year and number of outreach clinics per 1000 children under 5 years increased by 15% and 189% respectively (P < .001). Increases in vaccination coverage for infants aged P < .001) and 75% for 1st dose Sabin (P < .001), 30% for 3rd dose pentavalent (P < .001) and 26% for measles vaccination (P < .001). Family planning coverage remained at similar levels (increasing 5%, P = .095) and antenatal care coverage increased by 26% (P < .001). Supervised deliveries coverage declined by 32% (P < .001), a continuation of the pre-Program trend. The proportion of facilities with standard equipment items, transport and lighting increased. Health worker training, in particular obstetric training, was most commonly cited by health workers as leading to improved services. Conclusion Following implementation, substantial improvements in health service delivery indicators were observed in the Health Program area as compared with pre-program period and the stagnating or declining national performance. This model could be considered for similar contexts where existing health service providers require external assistance to provide basic health services to the community.http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3505_f460c4c948cbb7fb8d512e2a2c9f3501.pdfPartnershipService DeliveryMonitoring and EvaluationPapua New Guinea |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emma Field Dominica Abo Louis Samiak Mafu Vila Georgina Dove Alex Rosewell Sally Nathan |
spellingShingle |
Emma Field Dominica Abo Louis Samiak Mafu Vila Georgina Dove Alex Rosewell Sally Nathan A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation International Journal of Health Policy and Management Partnership Service Delivery Monitoring and Evaluation Papua New Guinea |
author_facet |
Emma Field Dominica Abo Louis Samiak Mafu Vila Georgina Dove Alex Rosewell Sally Nathan |
author_sort |
Emma Field |
title |
A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_short |
A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_full |
A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_sort |
partnership model for improving service delivery in remote papua new guinea: a mixed methods evaluation |
publisher |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
series |
International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
issn |
2322-5939 2322-5939 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
Background
The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing health service providers to improve service delivery using existing government systems, where possible, and aligns with national policies, plans and strategies. A midline evaluation was conducted to determine changes in health service delivery since commencement of the Health Program.
Methods
A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken mid-way through implementation of the Health Program, including a pre/post analysis of health service delivery indicators, semi-structured interviews with health workers and assessment of health facility equipment and infrastructure.
Results
Improvements in many of the long-term expected outcomes of the Health Program were observed when compared to the pre-program period. The number of outpatient visits per person per year and number of outreach clinics per 1000 children under 5 years increased by 15% and 189% respectively (P < .001). Increases in vaccination coverage for infants aged P < .001) and 75% for 1st dose Sabin (P < .001), 30% for 3rd dose pentavalent (P < .001) and 26% for measles vaccination (P < .001). Family planning coverage remained at similar levels (increasing 5%, P = .095) and antenatal care coverage increased by 26% (P < .001). Supervised deliveries coverage declined by 32% (P < .001), a continuation of the pre-Program trend. The proportion of facilities with standard equipment items, transport and lighting increased. Health worker training, in particular obstetric training, was most commonly cited by health workers as leading to improved services.
Conclusion
Following implementation, substantial improvements in health service delivery indicators were observed in the Health Program area as compared with pre-program period and the stagnating or declining national performance. This model could be considered for similar contexts where existing health service providers require external assistance to provide basic health services to the community. |
topic |
Partnership Service Delivery Monitoring and Evaluation Papua New Guinea |
url |
http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3505_f460c4c948cbb7fb8d512e2a2c9f3501.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emmafield apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT dominicaabo apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT louissamiak apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT mafuvila apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT georginadove apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT alexrosewell apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT sallynathan apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT emmafield partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT dominicaabo partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT louissamiak partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT mafuvila partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT georginadove partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT alexrosewell partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT sallynathan partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation |
_version_ |
1725884869036212224 |