Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)

We compared techniques used by poachers to capture fishes in the streams and stagnant water bodies of the Tisa River basin in Ukraine, which included: gill nets, lift nets, screen nets, electrofishing devices, spears, concussion, and beach seine. In total, 38 species were observed in poachers’ catch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Didenko Alexander, Velykopolsky Igor, Chuklin Andrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2014-10-01
Series:Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2015-0019
id doaj-8ba4bed7761043f8a6eef34f1311b163
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ba4bed7761043f8a6eef34f1311b1632021-09-05T20:51:33ZengSciendoTransylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research2344-32192014-10-0116210711810.1515/trser-2015-0019trser-2015-0019Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)Didenko Alexander0Velykopolsky Igor1Chuklin Andrey2 Institute of Fisheries, Obukhivska Street 135, Kiev Ukraine, UA-03164 Zakarpattya Fish Protection Inspection, Miru Street 53, Vynogradiv, Ukraine, UA-90300 Ukraine Fisheries Agency, Artema Street, 45-A, Kiev, Ukraine, UA-03151We compared techniques used by poachers to capture fishes in the streams and stagnant water bodies of the Tisa River basin in Ukraine, which included: gill nets, lift nets, screen nets, electrofishing devices, spears, concussion, and beach seine. In total, 38 species were observed in poachers’ catches, among which the most abundant were nase (Chondrostoma nasus), Carpathian barbel (Barbus carpathicus), chub (Squalius cephalus), crucian carp (Carassius gibelio), and minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). The highest diversity of species was observed in gill nets (25 species in rivers and 10 in stagnant waters), lift nets (20 species in rivers and eight in stagnant waters), and electrofishing (19 species). Poachers’ catches can provide information on fish species’ compositions and relative abundance in montane rivers; but there are biases associated with each technique.https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2015-0019transcarpathiatisa riverpoachingfishing gearscatchability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Didenko Alexander
Velykopolsky Igor
Chuklin Andrey
spellingShingle Didenko Alexander
Velykopolsky Igor
Chuklin Andrey
Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)
Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research
transcarpathia
tisa river
poaching
fishing gears
catchability
author_facet Didenko Alexander
Velykopolsky Igor
Chuklin Andrey
author_sort Didenko Alexander
title Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)
title_short Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)
title_full Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)
title_fullStr Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)
title_full_unstemmed Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)
title_sort use of poachers’ catches for studying fish fauna in the water bodies of the transcarpathian region (ukraine)
publisher Sciendo
series Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research
issn 2344-3219
publishDate 2014-10-01
description We compared techniques used by poachers to capture fishes in the streams and stagnant water bodies of the Tisa River basin in Ukraine, which included: gill nets, lift nets, screen nets, electrofishing devices, spears, concussion, and beach seine. In total, 38 species were observed in poachers’ catches, among which the most abundant were nase (Chondrostoma nasus), Carpathian barbel (Barbus carpathicus), chub (Squalius cephalus), crucian carp (Carassius gibelio), and minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). The highest diversity of species was observed in gill nets (25 species in rivers and 10 in stagnant waters), lift nets (20 species in rivers and eight in stagnant waters), and electrofishing (19 species). Poachers’ catches can provide information on fish species’ compositions and relative abundance in montane rivers; but there are biases associated with each technique.
topic transcarpathia
tisa river
poaching
fishing gears
catchability
url https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2015-0019
work_keys_str_mv AT didenkoalexander useofpoacherscatchesforstudyingfishfaunainthewaterbodiesofthetranscarpathianregionukraine
AT velykopolskyigor useofpoacherscatchesforstudyingfishfaunainthewaterbodiesofthetranscarpathianregionukraine
AT chuklinandrey useofpoacherscatchesforstudyingfishfaunainthewaterbodiesofthetranscarpathianregionukraine
_version_ 1717783662052769792