Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)
We compared techniques used by poachers to capture fishes in the streams and stagnant water bodies of the Tisa River basin in Ukraine, which included: gill nets, lift nets, screen nets, electrofishing devices, spears, concussion, and beach seine. In total, 38 species were observed in poachers’ catch...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2015-0019 |
id |
doaj-8ba4bed7761043f8a6eef34f1311b163 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8ba4bed7761043f8a6eef34f1311b1632021-09-05T20:51:33ZengSciendoTransylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research2344-32192014-10-0116210711810.1515/trser-2015-0019trser-2015-0019Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine)Didenko Alexander0Velykopolsky Igor1Chuklin Andrey2 Institute of Fisheries, Obukhivska Street 135, Kiev Ukraine, UA-03164 Zakarpattya Fish Protection Inspection, Miru Street 53, Vynogradiv, Ukraine, UA-90300 Ukraine Fisheries Agency, Artema Street, 45-A, Kiev, Ukraine, UA-03151We compared techniques used by poachers to capture fishes in the streams and stagnant water bodies of the Tisa River basin in Ukraine, which included: gill nets, lift nets, screen nets, electrofishing devices, spears, concussion, and beach seine. In total, 38 species were observed in poachers’ catches, among which the most abundant were nase (Chondrostoma nasus), Carpathian barbel (Barbus carpathicus), chub (Squalius cephalus), crucian carp (Carassius gibelio), and minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). The highest diversity of species was observed in gill nets (25 species in rivers and 10 in stagnant waters), lift nets (20 species in rivers and eight in stagnant waters), and electrofishing (19 species). Poachers’ catches can provide information on fish species’ compositions and relative abundance in montane rivers; but there are biases associated with each technique.https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2015-0019transcarpathiatisa riverpoachingfishing gearscatchability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Didenko Alexander Velykopolsky Igor Chuklin Andrey |
spellingShingle |
Didenko Alexander Velykopolsky Igor Chuklin Andrey Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine) Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research transcarpathia tisa river poaching fishing gears catchability |
author_facet |
Didenko Alexander Velykopolsky Igor Chuklin Andrey |
author_sort |
Didenko Alexander |
title |
Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine) |
title_short |
Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine) |
title_full |
Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine) |
title_fullStr |
Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use Of Poachers’ Catches For Studying Fish Fauna In The Water Bodies Of The Transcarpathian Region (Ukraine) |
title_sort |
use of poachers’ catches for studying fish fauna in the water bodies of the transcarpathian region (ukraine) |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research |
issn |
2344-3219 |
publishDate |
2014-10-01 |
description |
We compared techniques used by poachers to capture fishes in the streams and stagnant water bodies of the Tisa River basin in Ukraine, which included: gill nets, lift nets, screen nets, electrofishing devices, spears, concussion, and beach seine. In total, 38 species were observed in poachers’ catches, among which the most abundant were nase (Chondrostoma nasus), Carpathian barbel (Barbus carpathicus), chub (Squalius cephalus), crucian carp (Carassius gibelio), and minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). The highest diversity of species was observed in gill nets (25 species in rivers and 10 in stagnant waters), lift nets (20 species in rivers and eight in stagnant waters), and electrofishing (19 species). Poachers’ catches can provide information on fish species’ compositions and relative abundance in montane rivers; but there are biases associated with each technique. |
topic |
transcarpathia tisa river poaching fishing gears catchability |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2015-0019 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT didenkoalexander useofpoacherscatchesforstudyingfishfaunainthewaterbodiesofthetranscarpathianregionukraine AT velykopolskyigor useofpoacherscatchesforstudyingfishfaunainthewaterbodiesofthetranscarpathianregionukraine AT chuklinandrey useofpoacherscatchesforstudyingfishfaunainthewaterbodiesofthetranscarpathianregionukraine |
_version_ |
1717783662052769792 |