Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy

“Source criticism” (<i>källkritik</i>) has become an essential part of the Swedish government’s activities against false information, deception campaigns, and propaganda, which are viewed as fundamentally destabilising forces that can potentially undermine the democratic system, the publ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fredrik Bertilsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Humanities
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/13
id doaj-8ba2adace3df434ca27b19b1df6f78e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ba2adace3df434ca27b19b1df6f78e32021-01-05T00:01:05ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872021-01-0110131310.3390/h10010013Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security PolicyFredrik Bertilsson0Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden“Source criticism” (<i>källkritik</i>) has become an essential part of the Swedish government’s activities against false information, deception campaigns, and propaganda, which are viewed as fundamentally destabilising forces that can potentially undermine the democratic system, the public debate, and political decision-making. The purpose of this article is to explore source criticism as a technology of government focusing on the Swedish Psychological Defence. I analyse the way in which source criticism is brought to bear on Swedish national security policy in the light of Foucauldian theories about modern governmentality and technologies of the self. Source criticism is seen as an example of a contemporary form of government that entails a redistribution of responsibility from the state to the individual, who is provided with certain “technologies of self” to master an unpredictable political environment. With this case study as empirical example, the aim of the article is to contribute to the research on the influence of humanistic knowledge in security and defence policy domains. This prompts further discussion about what happens with the democratic and critical potential of humanistic knowledge as it is enrolled in government operations.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/13source criticismtechnologies of governmentimpact of the humanitiessecurity policygovernmentpolicy influence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fredrik Bertilsson
spellingShingle Fredrik Bertilsson
Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy
Humanities
source criticism
technologies of government
impact of the humanities
security policy
government
policy influence
author_facet Fredrik Bertilsson
author_sort Fredrik Bertilsson
title Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy
title_short Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy
title_full Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy
title_fullStr Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy
title_full_unstemmed Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy
title_sort source criticism as a technology of government in the swedish psychological defence: the impact of humanistic knowledge on contemporary security policy
publisher MDPI AG
series Humanities
issn 2076-0787
publishDate 2021-01-01
description “Source criticism” (<i>källkritik</i>) has become an essential part of the Swedish government’s activities against false information, deception campaigns, and propaganda, which are viewed as fundamentally destabilising forces that can potentially undermine the democratic system, the public debate, and political decision-making. The purpose of this article is to explore source criticism as a technology of government focusing on the Swedish Psychological Defence. I analyse the way in which source criticism is brought to bear on Swedish national security policy in the light of Foucauldian theories about modern governmentality and technologies of the self. Source criticism is seen as an example of a contemporary form of government that entails a redistribution of responsibility from the state to the individual, who is provided with certain “technologies of self” to master an unpredictable political environment. With this case study as empirical example, the aim of the article is to contribute to the research on the influence of humanistic knowledge in security and defence policy domains. This prompts further discussion about what happens with the democratic and critical potential of humanistic knowledge as it is enrolled in government operations.
topic source criticism
technologies of government
impact of the humanities
security policy
government
policy influence
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/13
work_keys_str_mv AT fredrikbertilsson sourcecriticismasatechnologyofgovernmentintheswedishpsychologicaldefencetheimpactofhumanisticknowledgeoncontemporarysecuritypolicy
_version_ 1724348779519279104