Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy
“Source criticism” (<i>källkritik</i>) has become an essential part of the Swedish government’s activities against false information, deception campaigns, and propaganda, which are viewed as fundamentally destabilising forces that can potentially undermine the democratic system, the publ...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Humanities |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/13 |
id |
doaj-8ba2adace3df434ca27b19b1df6f78e3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8ba2adace3df434ca27b19b1df6f78e32021-01-05T00:01:05ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872021-01-0110131310.3390/h10010013Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security PolicyFredrik Bertilsson0Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden“Source criticism” (<i>källkritik</i>) has become an essential part of the Swedish government’s activities against false information, deception campaigns, and propaganda, which are viewed as fundamentally destabilising forces that can potentially undermine the democratic system, the public debate, and political decision-making. The purpose of this article is to explore source criticism as a technology of government focusing on the Swedish Psychological Defence. I analyse the way in which source criticism is brought to bear on Swedish national security policy in the light of Foucauldian theories about modern governmentality and technologies of the self. Source criticism is seen as an example of a contemporary form of government that entails a redistribution of responsibility from the state to the individual, who is provided with certain “technologies of self” to master an unpredictable political environment. With this case study as empirical example, the aim of the article is to contribute to the research on the influence of humanistic knowledge in security and defence policy domains. This prompts further discussion about what happens with the democratic and critical potential of humanistic knowledge as it is enrolled in government operations.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/13source criticismtechnologies of governmentimpact of the humanitiessecurity policygovernmentpolicy influence |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fredrik Bertilsson |
spellingShingle |
Fredrik Bertilsson Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy Humanities source criticism technologies of government impact of the humanities security policy government policy influence |
author_facet |
Fredrik Bertilsson |
author_sort |
Fredrik Bertilsson |
title |
Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy |
title_short |
Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy |
title_full |
Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy |
title_fullStr |
Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Source Criticism as a Technology of Government in the Swedish Psychological Defence: The Impact of Humanistic Knowledge on Contemporary Security Policy |
title_sort |
source criticism as a technology of government in the swedish psychological defence: the impact of humanistic knowledge on contemporary security policy |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Humanities |
issn |
2076-0787 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
“Source criticism” (<i>källkritik</i>) has become an essential part of the Swedish government’s activities against false information, deception campaigns, and propaganda, which are viewed as fundamentally destabilising forces that can potentially undermine the democratic system, the public debate, and political decision-making. The purpose of this article is to explore source criticism as a technology of government focusing on the Swedish Psychological Defence. I analyse the way in which source criticism is brought to bear on Swedish national security policy in the light of Foucauldian theories about modern governmentality and technologies of the self. Source criticism is seen as an example of a contemporary form of government that entails a redistribution of responsibility from the state to the individual, who is provided with certain “technologies of self” to master an unpredictable political environment. With this case study as empirical example, the aim of the article is to contribute to the research on the influence of humanistic knowledge in security and defence policy domains. This prompts further discussion about what happens with the democratic and critical potential of humanistic knowledge as it is enrolled in government operations. |
topic |
source criticism technologies of government impact of the humanities security policy government policy influence |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/13 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fredrikbertilsson sourcecriticismasatechnologyofgovernmentintheswedishpsychologicaldefencetheimpactofhumanisticknowledgeoncontemporarysecuritypolicy |
_version_ |
1724348779519279104 |