Culture in the European East-Baltic Periphery: Embarrassed Coexistence of Fashion, Officialism and Resistance. The Estonian Case of K. J. Peterson

Despite some historically conditioned differences between three Eastern-Baltic cultures, none of them seems to have had sufficient defence mechanisms to develop any substantial resistance to powerful cultural fashions and officialism in culture imposed by major centres of economical-political power...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jüri Talvet
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: University of Tartu Press 2015-07-01
Series:Interlitteraria
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/IL/article/view/12152
id doaj-8b9a6e341b714f4e849a0ea1b013e74e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b9a6e341b714f4e849a0ea1b013e74e2020-11-25T01:43:18ZdeuUniversity of Tartu PressInterlitteraria1406-07012228-47292015-07-0120110.12697/IL.2015.20.1.2Culture in the European East-Baltic Periphery: Embarrassed Coexistence of Fashion, Officialism and Resistance. The Estonian Case of K. J. PetersonJüri Talvet0Tartu Ülikool, Maailmakirjanduse õppetool, Ülikooli 17–403, 51014 Tartu Despite some historically conditioned differences between three Eastern-Baltic cultures, none of them seems to have had sufficient defence mechanisms to develop any substantial resistance to powerful cultural fashions and officialism in culture imposed by major centres of economical-political power of Europe and the West in the different stages of their cultural history. A more detailed and concrete analysis of these processes has hardly been possible, as the mutual access to the “other” in its respective permutations has been deficient and highly fragmented. Genuinely comparative cultural studies have been quite weak so far even in such fields of creativity as music and visual arts, not to speak of literature, the most complicated and multi-layered creative-cultural area, in which the dependence on the vernacular linguistic factor is exclusive and unavoidable. For the time being – without any guarantee that future could bring some improvement – we can only intuitively grasp some parallel developments. What we can do in the field of comparative literature is to describe and establish the contours of a model of the interaction between fashion, officialism and resistance in one particular ethnic culture. After that first step we can follow to the comparison of all three models, as well as to introduce their correction and modification, describing concrete cases of coincidence, overlapping and also difference. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/IL/article/view/12152culture within culturefashionofficialismalienationresistance
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jüri Talvet
spellingShingle Jüri Talvet
Culture in the European East-Baltic Periphery: Embarrassed Coexistence of Fashion, Officialism and Resistance. The Estonian Case of K. J. Peterson
Interlitteraria
culture within culture
fashion
officialism
alienation
resistance
author_facet Jüri Talvet
author_sort Jüri Talvet
title Culture in the European East-Baltic Periphery: Embarrassed Coexistence of Fashion, Officialism and Resistance. The Estonian Case of K. J. Peterson
title_short Culture in the European East-Baltic Periphery: Embarrassed Coexistence of Fashion, Officialism and Resistance. The Estonian Case of K. J. Peterson
title_full Culture in the European East-Baltic Periphery: Embarrassed Coexistence of Fashion, Officialism and Resistance. The Estonian Case of K. J. Peterson
title_fullStr Culture in the European East-Baltic Periphery: Embarrassed Coexistence of Fashion, Officialism and Resistance. The Estonian Case of K. J. Peterson
title_full_unstemmed Culture in the European East-Baltic Periphery: Embarrassed Coexistence of Fashion, Officialism and Resistance. The Estonian Case of K. J. Peterson
title_sort culture in the european east-baltic periphery: embarrassed coexistence of fashion, officialism and resistance. the estonian case of k. j. peterson
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Interlitteraria
issn 1406-0701
2228-4729
publishDate 2015-07-01
description Despite some historically conditioned differences between three Eastern-Baltic cultures, none of them seems to have had sufficient defence mechanisms to develop any substantial resistance to powerful cultural fashions and officialism in culture imposed by major centres of economical-political power of Europe and the West in the different stages of their cultural history. A more detailed and concrete analysis of these processes has hardly been possible, as the mutual access to the “other” in its respective permutations has been deficient and highly fragmented. Genuinely comparative cultural studies have been quite weak so far even in such fields of creativity as music and visual arts, not to speak of literature, the most complicated and multi-layered creative-cultural area, in which the dependence on the vernacular linguistic factor is exclusive and unavoidable. For the time being – without any guarantee that future could bring some improvement – we can only intuitively grasp some parallel developments. What we can do in the field of comparative literature is to describe and establish the contours of a model of the interaction between fashion, officialism and resistance in one particular ethnic culture. After that first step we can follow to the comparison of all three models, as well as to introduce their correction and modification, describing concrete cases of coincidence, overlapping and also difference.
topic culture within culture
fashion
officialism
alienation
resistance
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/IL/article/view/12152
work_keys_str_mv AT juritalvet cultureintheeuropeaneastbalticperipheryembarrassedcoexistenceoffashionofficialismandresistancetheestoniancaseofkjpeterson
_version_ 1725032216165089280