Health systems integration: state of the evidence

Introduction: Integrated health systems are considered a solution to the challenge of maintaining the accessibility and integrity of healthcare in numerous jurisdictions worldwide. However, decision makers in a Canadian health region indicated they were challenged to find evidence-based information...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gail D. Armitage, Esther Suter, Nelly D. Oelke, Carol E. Adair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2009-06-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/316
id doaj-8b869e77d3f3467d9d69e7a9a05ba187
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b869e77d3f3467d9d69e7a9a05ba1872020-11-24T22:02:01ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562009-06-0192316Health systems integration: state of the evidenceGail D. ArmitageEsther SuterNelly D. OelkeCarol E. AdairIntroduction: Integrated health systems are considered a solution to the challenge of maintaining the accessibility and integrity of healthcare in numerous jurisdictions worldwide. However, decision makers in a Canadian health region indicated they were challenged to find evidence-based information to assist with the planning and implementation of integrated healthcare systems. <br><br> Methods: A systematic literature review of peer-reviewed literature from health sciences and business databases, and targeted grey literature sources. <br><br> Results: Despite the large number of articles discussing integration, significant gaps in the research literature exist. There was a lack of high quality, empirical studies providing evidence on how health systems can improve service delivery and population health. No universal definition or concept of integration was found and multiple integration models from both the healthcare and business literature were proposed in the literature. The review also revealed a lack of standardized, validated tools that have been systematically used to evaluate integration outcomes. This makes measuring and comparing the impact of integration on system, provider and patient level challenging. <br><br> Discussion and conclusion: Healthcare is likely too complex for a one-size-fits-all integration solution. It is important for decision makers and planners to choose a set of complementary models, structures and processes to create an integrated health system that fits the needs of the population across the continuum of care. However, in order to have evidence available, decision makers and planners should include evaluation for accountability purposes and to ensure a better understanding of the effectiveness and impact of health systems integration.http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/316health systems integrationsystematic literature reviewevidence-based policy decisions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gail D. Armitage
Esther Suter
Nelly D. Oelke
Carol E. Adair
spellingShingle Gail D. Armitage
Esther Suter
Nelly D. Oelke
Carol E. Adair
Health systems integration: state of the evidence
International Journal of Integrated Care
health systems integration
systematic literature review
evidence-based policy decisions
author_facet Gail D. Armitage
Esther Suter
Nelly D. Oelke
Carol E. Adair
author_sort Gail D. Armitage
title Health systems integration: state of the evidence
title_short Health systems integration: state of the evidence
title_full Health systems integration: state of the evidence
title_fullStr Health systems integration: state of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Health systems integration: state of the evidence
title_sort health systems integration: state of the evidence
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2009-06-01
description Introduction: Integrated health systems are considered a solution to the challenge of maintaining the accessibility and integrity of healthcare in numerous jurisdictions worldwide. However, decision makers in a Canadian health region indicated they were challenged to find evidence-based information to assist with the planning and implementation of integrated healthcare systems. <br><br> Methods: A systematic literature review of peer-reviewed literature from health sciences and business databases, and targeted grey literature sources. <br><br> Results: Despite the large number of articles discussing integration, significant gaps in the research literature exist. There was a lack of high quality, empirical studies providing evidence on how health systems can improve service delivery and population health. No universal definition or concept of integration was found and multiple integration models from both the healthcare and business literature were proposed in the literature. The review also revealed a lack of standardized, validated tools that have been systematically used to evaluate integration outcomes. This makes measuring and comparing the impact of integration on system, provider and patient level challenging. <br><br> Discussion and conclusion: Healthcare is likely too complex for a one-size-fits-all integration solution. It is important for decision makers and planners to choose a set of complementary models, structures and processes to create an integrated health system that fits the needs of the population across the continuum of care. However, in order to have evidence available, decision makers and planners should include evaluation for accountability purposes and to ensure a better understanding of the effectiveness and impact of health systems integration.
topic health systems integration
systematic literature review
evidence-based policy decisions
url http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/316
work_keys_str_mv AT gaildarmitage healthsystemsintegrationstateoftheevidence
AT esthersuter healthsystemsintegrationstateoftheevidence
AT nellydoelke healthsystemsintegrationstateoftheevidence
AT caroleadair healthsystemsintegrationstateoftheevidence
_version_ 1725837368212062208