Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement

Personality predicts academic achievement above and beyond intelligence. However, studies investigating the possible interaction effects between personality and intelligence when predicting academic achievement are scarce, as is the separate investigation of broad personality factors versus narrow p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Bergold, Ricarda Steinmayr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-05-01
Series:Journal of Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/6/2/27
id doaj-8b81a4427ec74cf6b9de6d21d937c138
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b81a4427ec74cf6b9de6d21d937c1382020-11-24T22:57:13ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002018-05-01622710.3390/jintelligence6020027jintelligence6020027Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic AchievementSebastian Bergold0Ricarda Steinmayr1Department of Psychology, Technical University Dortmund, Emil-Figge-Straße 50, 44227 Dortmund, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Technical University Dortmund, Emil-Figge-Straße 50, 44227 Dortmund, GermanyPersonality predicts academic achievement above and beyond intelligence. However, studies investigating the possible interaction effects between personality and intelligence when predicting academic achievement are scarce, as is the separate investigation of broad personality factors versus narrow personality facets in this context. Two studies with 11th grade students (Study 1: N = 421; Study 2: N = 243) were conducted to close this research gap. The students completed the Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000 R measuring general reasoning ability, and a well-established personality inventory based on the Five Factor Model. Academic achievement was operationalized via Grade Point Average. Using hierarchical regression and moderation analyses, Study 1 revealed that Conscientiousness interacted with intelligence when predicting academic achievement: there was a stronger association between intelligence and academic achievement when students scored higher on the Conscientiousness scale. Study 2 confirmed the findings from Study 1 and also found a moderation effect of Neuroticism (stronger association between intelligence and academic achievement with lower values on the Neuroticism scale). Analyses at the facet level revealed much more differentiated results than did analyses at the domain level, suggesting that investigating personality facets should be preferred over investigating personality domains when predicting academic achievement.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/6/2/27personality factorspersonality facetsBig Fiveintelligencepersonality-intelligence interfaceacademic achievementgrade point average
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Bergold
Ricarda Steinmayr
spellingShingle Sebastian Bergold
Ricarda Steinmayr
Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement
Journal of Intelligence
personality factors
personality facets
Big Five
intelligence
personality-intelligence interface
academic achievement
grade point average
author_facet Sebastian Bergold
Ricarda Steinmayr
author_sort Sebastian Bergold
title Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement
title_short Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement
title_full Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement
title_fullStr Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement
title_full_unstemmed Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement
title_sort personality and intelligence interact in the prediction of academic achievement
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Intelligence
issn 2079-3200
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Personality predicts academic achievement above and beyond intelligence. However, studies investigating the possible interaction effects between personality and intelligence when predicting academic achievement are scarce, as is the separate investigation of broad personality factors versus narrow personality facets in this context. Two studies with 11th grade students (Study 1: N = 421; Study 2: N = 243) were conducted to close this research gap. The students completed the Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000 R measuring general reasoning ability, and a well-established personality inventory based on the Five Factor Model. Academic achievement was operationalized via Grade Point Average. Using hierarchical regression and moderation analyses, Study 1 revealed that Conscientiousness interacted with intelligence when predicting academic achievement: there was a stronger association between intelligence and academic achievement when students scored higher on the Conscientiousness scale. Study 2 confirmed the findings from Study 1 and also found a moderation effect of Neuroticism (stronger association between intelligence and academic achievement with lower values on the Neuroticism scale). Analyses at the facet level revealed much more differentiated results than did analyses at the domain level, suggesting that investigating personality facets should be preferred over investigating personality domains when predicting academic achievement.
topic personality factors
personality facets
Big Five
intelligence
personality-intelligence interface
academic achievement
grade point average
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/6/2/27
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianbergold personalityandintelligenceinteractinthepredictionofacademicachievement
AT ricardasteinmayr personalityandintelligenceinteractinthepredictionofacademicachievement
_version_ 1725651227122860032