Preface

In the preface to this special issue of FORUM on Readers and Writers, I wish to take the opportunity to think briefly about a question that preoccupies all historians of reading, to a greater or lesser extent, and that is the problem of evidence. Reading is an evanescent activity, which mostly goes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katie Halsey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2016-12-01
Series:Forum
Online Access:http://www.forumjournal.org/article/view/1708
id doaj-8b6a711e8f964476b76d5bdbb87565c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b6a711e8f964476b76d5bdbb87565c62020-11-25T03:26:07ZengUniversity of EdinburghForum1749-97712016-12-01231708PrefaceKatie Halsey0University of StirlingIn the preface to this special issue of FORUM on Readers and Writers, I wish to take the opportunity to think briefly about a question that preoccupies all historians of reading, to a greater or lesser extent, and that is the problem of evidence. Reading is an evanescent activity, which mostly goes unremarked, unrecorded, and very often, unnoticed. Under such circumstances, how can we retrieve its history? From Robert Darnton in 1986, outlining his ‘first steps toward a history of reading’, to those of us still working on the history of reading in 2016, we have been wrestling with precisely the same problem. As Simon Eliot put it in 1992, ‘any reading recorded in an historically recoverable way is, almost by definition, an exceptional recording of an uncharacteristic event by an untypical person’.http://www.forumjournal.org/article/view/1708
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katie Halsey
spellingShingle Katie Halsey
Preface
Forum
author_facet Katie Halsey
author_sort Katie Halsey
title Preface
title_short Preface
title_full Preface
title_fullStr Preface
title_full_unstemmed Preface
title_sort preface
publisher University of Edinburgh
series Forum
issn 1749-9771
publishDate 2016-12-01
description In the preface to this special issue of FORUM on Readers and Writers, I wish to take the opportunity to think briefly about a question that preoccupies all historians of reading, to a greater or lesser extent, and that is the problem of evidence. Reading is an evanescent activity, which mostly goes unremarked, unrecorded, and very often, unnoticed. Under such circumstances, how can we retrieve its history? From Robert Darnton in 1986, outlining his ‘first steps toward a history of reading’, to those of us still working on the history of reading in 2016, we have been wrestling with precisely the same problem. As Simon Eliot put it in 1992, ‘any reading recorded in an historically recoverable way is, almost by definition, an exceptional recording of an uncharacteristic event by an untypical person’.
url http://www.forumjournal.org/article/view/1708
work_keys_str_mv AT katiehalsey preface
_version_ 1724594005490008064