Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance
Abstract Background Health research has scientific, social and political impacts. To achieve such impacts, several institutions need to participate; however, health research funding institutions are seldom nominated in the literature as essential players. The attention they have received has so far...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Health Research Policy and Systems |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-020-0525-z |
id |
doaj-8b5ac433d05f49f098f6dca66d73aa51 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8b5ac433d05f49f098f6dca66d73aa512020-11-25T03:37:04ZengBMCHealth Research Policy and Systems1478-45052020-02-0118111910.1186/s12961-020-0525-zGovernance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governancePernelle Smits0François Champagne1Université Laval, Pavillon Palasis PrinceDépartement d’Administration de la santé, University of MontréalAbstract Background Health research has scientific, social and political impacts. To achieve such impacts, several institutions need to participate; however, health research funding institutions are seldom nominated in the literature as essential players. The attention they have received has so far focused mainly on their role in knowledge translation, informing policy-making and the need to organise health research systems. In this article, we will focus solely on the governance of national health research funding institutions. Our objectives are to identify the main functions of governance for such institutions and actionable governance functions. This research should be useful in several ways, including in highlighting, tracking and measuring the governance trends in a given funding institution, and to forestall low-level governance. Methods First, we reviewed existing frameworks in the grey literature, selecting seven relevant documents. Second, we developed an integrated framework for health research funding institution governance and management. Third, we extracted actionable information for governance by selecting a mix of North American, European and Asian institutions that had documentation available in English (e.g. annual report, legal status, strategy). Results The framework contains 13 functions – 5 dedicated to governance (intelligence acquisition, resourcing and instrumentation, relationships management, accountability and performance, and strategy formulation), 3 dedicated to management (priority-setting, financing and knowledge transfer), and 5 dedicated to transversal logics that apply to both governance and management (ethics, transparency, capacity reinforcement, monitoring and evaluation, and public engagement). Conclusions Herein, we provide a conceptual contribution for scholars in the field of governance and health research as well as a practical contribution, with actionable functions for high-level managers in charge of the governance of health research funding institutions.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-020-0525-z |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pernelle Smits François Champagne |
spellingShingle |
Pernelle Smits François Champagne Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance Health Research Policy and Systems |
author_facet |
Pernelle Smits François Champagne |
author_sort |
Pernelle Smits |
title |
Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance |
title_short |
Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance |
title_full |
Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance |
title_fullStr |
Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance |
title_sort |
governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Health Research Policy and Systems |
issn |
1478-4505 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Health research has scientific, social and political impacts. To achieve such impacts, several institutions need to participate; however, health research funding institutions are seldom nominated in the literature as essential players. The attention they have received has so far focused mainly on their role in knowledge translation, informing policy-making and the need to organise health research systems. In this article, we will focus solely on the governance of national health research funding institutions. Our objectives are to identify the main functions of governance for such institutions and actionable governance functions. This research should be useful in several ways, including in highlighting, tracking and measuring the governance trends in a given funding institution, and to forestall low-level governance. Methods First, we reviewed existing frameworks in the grey literature, selecting seven relevant documents. Second, we developed an integrated framework for health research funding institution governance and management. Third, we extracted actionable information for governance by selecting a mix of North American, European and Asian institutions that had documentation available in English (e.g. annual report, legal status, strategy). Results The framework contains 13 functions – 5 dedicated to governance (intelligence acquisition, resourcing and instrumentation, relationships management, accountability and performance, and strategy formulation), 3 dedicated to management (priority-setting, financing and knowledge transfer), and 5 dedicated to transversal logics that apply to both governance and management (ethics, transparency, capacity reinforcement, monitoring and evaluation, and public engagement). Conclusions Herein, we provide a conceptual contribution for scholars in the field of governance and health research as well as a practical contribution, with actionable functions for high-level managers in charge of the governance of health research funding institutions. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-020-0525-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pernellesmits governanceofhealthresearchfundinginstitutionsanintegratedconceptualframeworkandactionablefunctionsofgovernance AT francoischampagne governanceofhealthresearchfundinginstitutionsanintegratedconceptualframeworkandactionablefunctionsofgovernance |
_version_ |
1724547340523536384 |