Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The concept of <it>continuum of care </it>has recently been highlighted as a core principle of maternal, newborn and child health initiatives, and as a means to save lives. However, evidence has consistently revealed that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan Rose, Mwanyangala Mathew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-03-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/18
id doaj-8b41cf8ea028457faa4b534067b1d5c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b41cf8ea028457faa4b534067b1d5c52020-11-25T01:27:06ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932012-03-011211810.1186/1471-2393-12-18Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?Nathan RoseMwanyangala Mathew<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The concept of <it>continuum of care </it>has recently been highlighted as a core principle of maternal, newborn and child health initiatives, and as a means to save lives. However, evidence has consistently revealed that access to care during and post delivery (intra and postpartum) remains a challenge in the <it>continuum of care </it>framework. In places where skilled delivery assistance is exclusively available in health facilities, access to health facilities is critical to the survival of the mother and her newborn. However, little is known about the association of place of delivery and survival of neonates. This paper uses longitudinal data generated in a Health and Demographic Surveillance System in rural Southern Tanzania to assess associations of neonatal mortality and place of delivery.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Three cohorts of singleton births (born 2005, 2006 and 2007) were each followed up from birth to 28 days. Place of birth was classified as either "health facility" or "community". Neonatal mortality rates were produced for each year and by place of birth. Poisson regression was used to estimate crude relative risks of neonatal death by place of birth. Adjusted ratios were derived by controlling for maternal age, birth order, maternal schooling, sex of the child and wealth status of the maternal household.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Neonatal mortality for health facility singleton deliveries in 2005 was 32.3 per 1000 live births while for those born in the community it was 29.7 per 1000 live births. In 2006, neonatal mortality rates were 28.9 and 26.9 per 1,000 live births for deliveries in health facilities and in the community respectively. In 2007 neonatal mortality rates were 33.2 and 27.0 per 1,000 live births for those born in health facilities and in the community respectively. Neonates born in a health facility had similar chances of dying as those born in the community in all the three years of study. Adjusted relative risks (ARR) for neonatal death born in a health facility in 2005, 2006 and 2007 were 0.99 (95%CI: 0.58 - 1.70), 0.98 (95%CI: 0.62 - 1.54) and 1.18 (95% CI: 0.76 - 1.85) respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We found no evidence to suggest that delivery in health facilities was associated with better survival chances of the neonates.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/18
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathan Rose
Mwanyangala Mathew
spellingShingle Nathan Rose
Mwanyangala Mathew
Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
author_facet Nathan Rose
Mwanyangala Mathew
author_sort Nathan Rose
title Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?
title_short Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?
title_full Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?
title_fullStr Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?
title_full_unstemmed Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?
title_sort survival of neonates in rural southern tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2012-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The concept of <it>continuum of care </it>has recently been highlighted as a core principle of maternal, newborn and child health initiatives, and as a means to save lives. However, evidence has consistently revealed that access to care during and post delivery (intra and postpartum) remains a challenge in the <it>continuum of care </it>framework. In places where skilled delivery assistance is exclusively available in health facilities, access to health facilities is critical to the survival of the mother and her newborn. However, little is known about the association of place of delivery and survival of neonates. This paper uses longitudinal data generated in a Health and Demographic Surveillance System in rural Southern Tanzania to assess associations of neonatal mortality and place of delivery.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Three cohorts of singleton births (born 2005, 2006 and 2007) were each followed up from birth to 28 days. Place of birth was classified as either "health facility" or "community". Neonatal mortality rates were produced for each year and by place of birth. Poisson regression was used to estimate crude relative risks of neonatal death by place of birth. Adjusted ratios were derived by controlling for maternal age, birth order, maternal schooling, sex of the child and wealth status of the maternal household.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Neonatal mortality for health facility singleton deliveries in 2005 was 32.3 per 1000 live births while for those born in the community it was 29.7 per 1000 live births. In 2006, neonatal mortality rates were 28.9 and 26.9 per 1,000 live births for deliveries in health facilities and in the community respectively. In 2007 neonatal mortality rates were 33.2 and 27.0 per 1,000 live births for those born in health facilities and in the community respectively. Neonates born in a health facility had similar chances of dying as those born in the community in all the three years of study. Adjusted relative risks (ARR) for neonatal death born in a health facility in 2005, 2006 and 2007 were 0.99 (95%CI: 0.58 - 1.70), 0.98 (95%CI: 0.62 - 1.54) and 1.18 (95% CI: 0.76 - 1.85) respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We found no evidence to suggest that delivery in health facilities was associated with better survival chances of the neonates.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/18
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanrose survivalofneonatesinruralsoutherntanzaniadoesplaceofdeliveryorcontinuumofcarematter
AT mwanyangalamathew survivalofneonatesinruralsoutherntanzaniadoesplaceofdeliveryorcontinuumofcarematter
_version_ 1725106933554216960