Evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colic

ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of several medications for acute biliary colic. MethodsTwo hundred and forty patients with acute biliary colic admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were selected for retrospective analysis and randomly divided into four group...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: WEI Lujia
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2015-10-01
Series:Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
Online Access:http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=6830
id doaj-8b3eed9e650b47d296261c3753a6f3b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b3eed9e650b47d296261c3753a6f3b22020-11-24T23:37:15ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Clinical HepatologyLinchuang Gandanbing Zazhi1001-52561001-52562015-10-0131101615161710.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2015.10.013Evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colicWEI Lujia0Emergency Department, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing 100029, ChinaObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of several medications for acute biliary colic. MethodsTwo hundred and forty patients with acute biliary colic admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were selected for retrospective analysis and randomly divided into four groups, namely raceanisodamine hydrochloride group (group A), phloroglucinol group (group B), tramadol hydrochloride (group C), and dezocine group (group D), with 60 cases in each group. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions were compared between the four groups using analysis of variance for continuous data and chi-square test for categorical data. ResultsVAS scores were decreased significantly after the treatment in each group (P<0.01) and the score in group D was the lowest (P<0.01). In terms of time to pain relief, the time in group A was the longest, and that in group D was the shortest, with significant difference (P<0.05). As for clinical efficacy, the overall response rate in group D was the highest, while that in group A was the lowest, with significant difference (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in groups C and D was the lowest, while that in group A was the highest, with significant difference (P<0.01). ConclusionThe clinical efficacy of dezocine and tramadol hydrochloride is better than that of raceanisodamine hydrochloride and phloroglucinol, and the former two are worthy of further clinical application. http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=6830
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author WEI Lujia
spellingShingle WEI Lujia
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colic
Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
author_facet WEI Lujia
author_sort WEI Lujia
title Evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colic
title_short Evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colic
title_full Evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colic
title_fullStr Evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colic
title_sort evaluation of clinical efficacy of different medications for acute biliary colic
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology
series Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
issn 1001-5256
1001-5256
publishDate 2015-10-01
description ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of several medications for acute biliary colic. MethodsTwo hundred and forty patients with acute biliary colic admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were selected for retrospective analysis and randomly divided into four groups, namely raceanisodamine hydrochloride group (group A), phloroglucinol group (group B), tramadol hydrochloride (group C), and dezocine group (group D), with 60 cases in each group. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions were compared between the four groups using analysis of variance for continuous data and chi-square test for categorical data. ResultsVAS scores were decreased significantly after the treatment in each group (P<0.01) and the score in group D was the lowest (P<0.01). In terms of time to pain relief, the time in group A was the longest, and that in group D was the shortest, with significant difference (P<0.05). As for clinical efficacy, the overall response rate in group D was the highest, while that in group A was the lowest, with significant difference (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in groups C and D was the lowest, while that in group A was the highest, with significant difference (P<0.01). ConclusionThe clinical efficacy of dezocine and tramadol hydrochloride is better than that of raceanisodamine hydrochloride and phloroglucinol, and the former two are worthy of further clinical application.
url http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=6830
work_keys_str_mv AT weilujia evaluationofclinicalefficacyofdifferentmedicationsforacutebiliarycolic
_version_ 1725520867469819904