A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation

Abstract Food security is under increased pressure due to the ever-growing world population. To tackle this, alternative protein sources need to be evaluated for nutritional value, which requires information on digesta peptide composition in comparison to established protein sources and coupling to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paulus G. M. Jochems, Willem R. Keusters, Antoine H. P. America, Pascale C. S. Rietveld, Shanna Bastiaan-Net, Renata M. C. Ariëns, Monic M. M. Tomassen, Fraser Lewis, Yang Li, Koen G. C. Westphal, Johan Garssen, Harry J. Wichers, Jeroen van Bergenhenegouwen, Rosalinde Masereeuw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2020-12-01
Series:npj Science of Food
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-020-00082-z
id doaj-8b3824adfd8543ed9a5b564af4ad6739
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b3824adfd8543ed9a5b564af4ad67392020-12-20T12:16:51ZengNature Publishing Groupnpj Science of Food2396-83702020-12-01411910.1038/s41538-020-00082-zA combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluationPaulus G. M. Jochems0Willem R. Keusters1Antoine H. P. America2Pascale C. S. Rietveld3Shanna Bastiaan-Net4Renata M. C. Ariëns5Monic M. M. Tomassen6Fraser Lewis7Yang Li8Koen G. C. Westphal9Johan Garssen10Harry J. Wichers11Jeroen van Bergenhenegouwen12Rosalinde Masereeuw13Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht UniversityJulius Centre, University Medical Center UtrechtWageningen Plant Research, Wageningen UniversityDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht UniversityWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen UniversityWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen UniversityWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen UniversityDanone Nutricia ResearchDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center UtrechtDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht UniversityDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht UniversityWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen UniversityDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht UniversityDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht UniversityAbstract Food security is under increased pressure due to the ever-growing world population. To tackle this, alternative protein sources need to be evaluated for nutritional value, which requires information on digesta peptide composition in comparison to established protein sources and coupling to biological parameters. Here, a combined experimental and computational approach is presented, which compared seventeen protein sources with cow’s whey protein concentrate (WPC) as the benchmark. In vitro digestion of proteins was followed by proteomics analysis and statistical model-based clustering. Information on digesta peptide composition resulted in 3 cluster groups, primarily driven by the peptide overlap with the benchmark protein WPC. Functional protein data was then incorporated in the computational model after evaluating the effects of eighteen protein digests on intestinal barrier integrity, viability, brush border enzyme activity, and immune parameters using a bioengineered intestine as microphysiological gut system. This resulted in 6 cluster groups. Biological clustering was driven by viability, brush border enzyme activity, and significant differences in immune parameters. Finally, a combination of proteomic and biological efficacy data resulted in 5 clusters groups, driven by a combination of digesta peptide composition and biological effects. The key finding of our holistic approach is that protein source (animal, plant or alternative derived) is not a driving force behind the delivery of bioactive peptides and their biological efficacy.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-020-00082-z
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paulus G. M. Jochems
Willem R. Keusters
Antoine H. P. America
Pascale C. S. Rietveld
Shanna Bastiaan-Net
Renata M. C. Ariëns
Monic M. M. Tomassen
Fraser Lewis
Yang Li
Koen G. C. Westphal
Johan Garssen
Harry J. Wichers
Jeroen van Bergenhenegouwen
Rosalinde Masereeuw
spellingShingle Paulus G. M. Jochems
Willem R. Keusters
Antoine H. P. America
Pascale C. S. Rietveld
Shanna Bastiaan-Net
Renata M. C. Ariëns
Monic M. M. Tomassen
Fraser Lewis
Yang Li
Koen G. C. Westphal
Johan Garssen
Harry J. Wichers
Jeroen van Bergenhenegouwen
Rosalinde Masereeuw
A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation
npj Science of Food
author_facet Paulus G. M. Jochems
Willem R. Keusters
Antoine H. P. America
Pascale C. S. Rietveld
Shanna Bastiaan-Net
Renata M. C. Ariëns
Monic M. M. Tomassen
Fraser Lewis
Yang Li
Koen G. C. Westphal
Johan Garssen
Harry J. Wichers
Jeroen van Bergenhenegouwen
Rosalinde Masereeuw
author_sort Paulus G. M. Jochems
title A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation
title_short A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation
title_full A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation
title_fullStr A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation
title_sort combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series npj Science of Food
issn 2396-8370
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract Food security is under increased pressure due to the ever-growing world population. To tackle this, alternative protein sources need to be evaluated for nutritional value, which requires information on digesta peptide composition in comparison to established protein sources and coupling to biological parameters. Here, a combined experimental and computational approach is presented, which compared seventeen protein sources with cow’s whey protein concentrate (WPC) as the benchmark. In vitro digestion of proteins was followed by proteomics analysis and statistical model-based clustering. Information on digesta peptide composition resulted in 3 cluster groups, primarily driven by the peptide overlap with the benchmark protein WPC. Functional protein data was then incorporated in the computational model after evaluating the effects of eighteen protein digests on intestinal barrier integrity, viability, brush border enzyme activity, and immune parameters using a bioengineered intestine as microphysiological gut system. This resulted in 6 cluster groups. Biological clustering was driven by viability, brush border enzyme activity, and significant differences in immune parameters. Finally, a combination of proteomic and biological efficacy data resulted in 5 clusters groups, driven by a combination of digesta peptide composition and biological effects. The key finding of our holistic approach is that protein source (animal, plant or alternative derived) is not a driving force behind the delivery of bioactive peptides and their biological efficacy.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-020-00082-z
work_keys_str_mv AT paulusgmjochems acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT willemrkeusters acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT antoinehpamerica acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT pascalecsrietveld acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT shannabastiaannet acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT renatamcariens acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT monicmmtomassen acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT fraserlewis acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT yangli acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT koengcwestphal acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT johangarssen acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT harryjwichers acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT jeroenvanbergenhenegouwen acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT rosalindemasereeuw acombinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT paulusgmjochems combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT willemrkeusters combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT antoinehpamerica combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT pascalecsrietveld combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT shannabastiaannet combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT renatamcariens combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT monicmmtomassen combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT fraserlewis combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT yangli combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT koengcwestphal combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT johangarssen combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT harryjwichers combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT jeroenvanbergenhenegouwen combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
AT rosalindemasereeuw combinedmicrophysiologicalcomputationalomicsapproachindietaryproteinevaluation
_version_ 1724376838126436352