Monocropping Cultures into Ruin: The Loss of Food Varieties and Cultural Diversity

The loss of genetic diversity of thousands of plants and crops has been well documented at least since the 1970s, and has been understood as a result of epistemological and political economic conditions of the Green Revolution. The political economic arrangement of the Green Revolution, alongside a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter J. Jacques, Jessica Racine Jacques
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/11/2970
id doaj-8b2e691df00c4d568d534cb19e68eab9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b2e691df00c4d568d534cb19e68eab92020-11-25T01:47:57ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502012-11-014112970299710.3390/su4112970Monocropping Cultures into Ruin: The Loss of Food Varieties and Cultural DiversityPeter J. JacquesJessica Racine JacquesThe loss of genetic diversity of thousands of plants and crops has been well documented at least since the 1970s, and has been understood as a result of epistemological and political economic conditions of the Green Revolution. The political economic arrangement of the Green Revolution, alongside a post-war focus on economies of scale and export-oriented growth, replace high-yield single varieties of crops for a diverse array of varieties that may not have the same yield, but may be able to resist pests, disease, and changing climatic conditions. Also, the harvest does not flow in all directions equally: Whereas small holder subsistence farming uses a large variety of crops as a food source and small-scale trade, the industrial economic system requires simplified, machine harvested ship-loads of one variety of maize, for example. Diverse varieties of different crops confound the machines, whereas one variety of wheat can be harvested with one setting on a machine. However, none of this is new. The purpose of this article is to analyze how the twin concerns of lost varietals and lost cultures are bound together in the socio-political process of standardization, and to explain some areas of resistance.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/11/2970Green Revolutionfood securityfood sovereigntymeans of productionproductive forcesculturepolitical ecologypolitical sociology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter J. Jacques
Jessica Racine Jacques
spellingShingle Peter J. Jacques
Jessica Racine Jacques
Monocropping Cultures into Ruin: The Loss of Food Varieties and Cultural Diversity
Sustainability
Green Revolution
food security
food sovereignty
means of production
productive forces
culture
political ecology
political sociology
author_facet Peter J. Jacques
Jessica Racine Jacques
author_sort Peter J. Jacques
title Monocropping Cultures into Ruin: The Loss of Food Varieties and Cultural Diversity
title_short Monocropping Cultures into Ruin: The Loss of Food Varieties and Cultural Diversity
title_full Monocropping Cultures into Ruin: The Loss of Food Varieties and Cultural Diversity
title_fullStr Monocropping Cultures into Ruin: The Loss of Food Varieties and Cultural Diversity
title_full_unstemmed Monocropping Cultures into Ruin: The Loss of Food Varieties and Cultural Diversity
title_sort monocropping cultures into ruin: the loss of food varieties and cultural diversity
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2012-11-01
description The loss of genetic diversity of thousands of plants and crops has been well documented at least since the 1970s, and has been understood as a result of epistemological and political economic conditions of the Green Revolution. The political economic arrangement of the Green Revolution, alongside a post-war focus on economies of scale and export-oriented growth, replace high-yield single varieties of crops for a diverse array of varieties that may not have the same yield, but may be able to resist pests, disease, and changing climatic conditions. Also, the harvest does not flow in all directions equally: Whereas small holder subsistence farming uses a large variety of crops as a food source and small-scale trade, the industrial economic system requires simplified, machine harvested ship-loads of one variety of maize, for example. Diverse varieties of different crops confound the machines, whereas one variety of wheat can be harvested with one setting on a machine. However, none of this is new. The purpose of this article is to analyze how the twin concerns of lost varietals and lost cultures are bound together in the socio-political process of standardization, and to explain some areas of resistance.
topic Green Revolution
food security
food sovereignty
means of production
productive forces
culture
political ecology
political sociology
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/11/2970
work_keys_str_mv AT peterjjacques monocroppingculturesintoruinthelossoffoodvarietiesandculturaldiversity
AT jessicaracinejacques monocroppingculturesintoruinthelossoffoodvarietiesandculturaldiversity
_version_ 1725013860036902912