Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two Cities
Many in Hong Kong voice concerns about the fate of Cantonese, including nativists (“localists”) and the general public. Guangzhou is seen as a harbinger of diminishing Cantonese in Hong Kong. News and commentaries paint a gloomy picture of Cantonese in Guangzhou. Yet rarely do we read about surveys...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Current Chinese Affairs |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102620983939 |
id |
doaj-8b2cb99c555c450e8eca11965b7f36a0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8b2cb99c555c450e8eca11965b7f36a02021-02-24T01:33:31ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Chinese Affairs1868-10261868-48742020-08-014910.1177/1868102620983939Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two CitiesBarry Sautman0Xinyi Xie1 Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong KongMany in Hong Kong voice concerns about the fate of Cantonese, including nativists (“localists”) and the general public. Guangzhou is seen as a harbinger of diminishing Cantonese in Hong Kong. News and commentaries paint a gloomy picture of Cantonese in Guangzhou. Yet rarely do we read about surveys on the range of Cantonese use and identity in Guangzhou. Neither do we see analyses on how the social context differences between Hong Kong and Guangzhou may have contributed to the two cities’ unique language situations. Our study delineates the Guangzhou and Hong Kong language situations, comparing mother tongues, ordinary languages, and language attitudes. Cantonese is unrivalled in Hong Kong and remains vital in Guangzhou. We put the two cities’ different use frequency and proficiency of Cantonese and Putonghua (“Mandarin”) in the sociocultural context of motivation and migration. We conclude that some claims of diminishing Cantonese are unsupported. We also address how likely it is that Cantonese will diminish or even be replaced in Hong Kong.https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102620983939 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Barry Sautman Xinyi Xie |
spellingShingle |
Barry Sautman Xinyi Xie Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two Cities Journal of Current Chinese Affairs |
author_facet |
Barry Sautman Xinyi Xie |
author_sort |
Barry Sautman |
title |
Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two Cities |
title_short |
Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two Cities |
title_full |
Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two Cities |
title_fullStr |
Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two Cities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Today in Guangzhou, Tomorrow in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study of the Language Situation in Two Cities |
title_sort |
today in guangzhou, tomorrow in hong kong? a comparative study of the language situation in two cities |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs |
issn |
1868-1026 1868-4874 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Many in Hong Kong voice concerns about the fate of Cantonese, including nativists (“localists”) and the general public. Guangzhou is seen as a harbinger of diminishing Cantonese in Hong Kong. News and commentaries paint a gloomy picture of Cantonese in Guangzhou. Yet rarely do we read about surveys on the range of Cantonese use and identity in Guangzhou. Neither do we see analyses on how the social context differences between Hong Kong and Guangzhou may have contributed to the two cities’ unique language situations. Our study delineates the Guangzhou and Hong Kong language situations, comparing mother tongues, ordinary languages, and language attitudes. Cantonese is unrivalled in Hong Kong and remains vital in Guangzhou. We put the two cities’ different use frequency and proficiency of Cantonese and Putonghua (“Mandarin”) in the sociocultural context of motivation and migration. We conclude that some claims of diminishing Cantonese are unsupported. We also address how likely it is that Cantonese will diminish or even be replaced in Hong Kong. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102620983939 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT barrysautman todayinguangzhoutomorrowinhongkongacomparativestudyofthelanguagesituationintwocities AT xinyixie todayinguangzhoutomorrowinhongkongacomparativestudyofthelanguagesituationintwocities |
_version_ |
1724253481041133568 |