Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change
<p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Quality indicators are increasingly used in healthcare but there are various barriers hindering their routine use. To promote the use of quality indicators, an exploration of the barriers to and facilitating factors for their implementation among hea...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2010-07-01
|
Series: | Implementation Science |
Online Access: | http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/52 |
id |
doaj-8b0dfa787d5748efb1a7cf36e8c74347 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8b0dfa787d5748efb1a7cf36e8c743472020-11-24T23:40:56ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082010-07-01515210.1186/1748-5908-5-52Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour changede Keizer Nicolette FGraafmans Wilco Cvan der Veer Sabine Nde Vos Maartje LGJager Kitty JWestert Gert Pvan der Voort Peter HJ<p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Quality indicators are increasingly used in healthcare but there are various barriers hindering their routine use. To promote the use of quality indicators, an exploration of the barriers to and facilitating factors for their implementation among healthcare professionals and managers of intensive care units (ICUs) is advocated.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All intensivists, ICU nurses, and managers (n = 142) working at 54 Dutch ICUs who participated in training sessions to support future implementation of quality indicators completed a questionnaire on perceived barriers and facilitators. Three types of barriers related to knowledge, attitude, and behaviour were assessed using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Behaviour-related barriers such as time constraints were most prominent (Mean Score, MS = 3.21), followed by barriers related to knowledge and attitude (MS = 3.62; MS = 4.12, respectively). Type of profession, age, and type of hospital were related to knowledge and behaviour. The facilitating factor perceived as most important by intensivists was administrative support (MS = 4.3; p = 0.02); for nurses, it was education (MS = 4.0; p = 0.01), and for managers, it was receiving feedback (MS = 4.5; p = 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results demonstrate that healthcare professionals and managers are familiar with using quality indicators to improve care, and that they have positive attitudes towards the implementation of quality indicators. Despite these facts, it is necessary to lower the barriers related to behavioural factors. In addition, as the barriers and facilitating factors differ among professions, age groups, and settings, tailored strategies are needed to implement quality indicators in daily practice.</p> http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/52 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
de Keizer Nicolette F Graafmans Wilco C van der Veer Sabine N de Vos Maartje LG Jager Kitty J Westert Gert P van der Voort Peter HJ |
spellingShingle |
de Keizer Nicolette F Graafmans Wilco C van der Veer Sabine N de Vos Maartje LG Jager Kitty J Westert Gert P van der Voort Peter HJ Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change Implementation Science |
author_facet |
de Keizer Nicolette F Graafmans Wilco C van der Veer Sabine N de Vos Maartje LG Jager Kitty J Westert Gert P van der Voort Peter HJ |
author_sort |
de Keizer Nicolette F |
title |
Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change |
title_short |
Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change |
title_full |
Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change |
title_fullStr |
Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change |
title_sort |
implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Implementation Science |
issn |
1748-5908 |
publishDate |
2010-07-01 |
description |
<p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Quality indicators are increasingly used in healthcare but there are various barriers hindering their routine use. To promote the use of quality indicators, an exploration of the barriers to and facilitating factors for their implementation among healthcare professionals and managers of intensive care units (ICUs) is advocated.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All intensivists, ICU nurses, and managers (n = 142) working at 54 Dutch ICUs who participated in training sessions to support future implementation of quality indicators completed a questionnaire on perceived barriers and facilitators. Three types of barriers related to knowledge, attitude, and behaviour were assessed using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Behaviour-related barriers such as time constraints were most prominent (Mean Score, MS = 3.21), followed by barriers related to knowledge and attitude (MS = 3.62; MS = 4.12, respectively). Type of profession, age, and type of hospital were related to knowledge and behaviour. The facilitating factor perceived as most important by intensivists was administrative support (MS = 4.3; p = 0.02); for nurses, it was education (MS = 4.0; p = 0.01), and for managers, it was receiving feedback (MS = 4.5; p = 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results demonstrate that healthcare professionals and managers are familiar with using quality indicators to improve care, and that they have positive attitudes towards the implementation of quality indicators. Despite these facts, it is necessary to lower the barriers related to behavioural factors. In addition, as the barriers and facilitating factors differ among professions, age groups, and settings, tailored strategies are needed to implement quality indicators in daily practice.</p> |
url |
http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/52 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dekeizernicolettef implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange AT graafmanswilcoc implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange AT vanderveersabinen implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange AT devosmaartjelg implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange AT jagerkittyj implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange AT westertgertp implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange AT vandervoortpeterhj implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange |
_version_ |
1725508697676840960 |