Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change

<p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Quality indicators are increasingly used in healthcare but there are various barriers hindering their routine use. To promote the use of quality indicators, an exploration of the barriers to and facilitating factors for their implementation among hea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Keizer Nicolette F, Graafmans Wilco C, van der Veer Sabine N, de Vos Maartje LG, Jager Kitty J, Westert Gert P, van der Voort Peter HJ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-07-01
Series:Implementation Science
Online Access:http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/52
id doaj-8b0dfa787d5748efb1a7cf36e8c74347
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b0dfa787d5748efb1a7cf36e8c743472020-11-24T23:40:56ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082010-07-01515210.1186/1748-5908-5-52Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour changede Keizer Nicolette FGraafmans Wilco Cvan der Veer Sabine Nde Vos Maartje LGJager Kitty JWestert Gert Pvan der Voort Peter HJ<p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Quality indicators are increasingly used in healthcare but there are various barriers hindering their routine use. To promote the use of quality indicators, an exploration of the barriers to and facilitating factors for their implementation among healthcare professionals and managers of intensive care units (ICUs) is advocated.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All intensivists, ICU nurses, and managers (n = 142) working at 54 Dutch ICUs who participated in training sessions to support future implementation of quality indicators completed a questionnaire on perceived barriers and facilitators. Three types of barriers related to knowledge, attitude, and behaviour were assessed using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Behaviour-related barriers such as time constraints were most prominent (Mean Score, MS = 3.21), followed by barriers related to knowledge and attitude (MS = 3.62; MS = 4.12, respectively). Type of profession, age, and type of hospital were related to knowledge and behaviour. The facilitating factor perceived as most important by intensivists was administrative support (MS = 4.3; p = 0.02); for nurses, it was education (MS = 4.0; p = 0.01), and for managers, it was receiving feedback (MS = 4.5; p = 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results demonstrate that healthcare professionals and managers are familiar with using quality indicators to improve care, and that they have positive attitudes towards the implementation of quality indicators. Despite these facts, it is necessary to lower the barriers related to behavioural factors. In addition, as the barriers and facilitating factors differ among professions, age groups, and settings, tailored strategies are needed to implement quality indicators in daily practice.</p> http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/52
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author de Keizer Nicolette F
Graafmans Wilco C
van der Veer Sabine N
de Vos Maartje LG
Jager Kitty J
Westert Gert P
van der Voort Peter HJ
spellingShingle de Keizer Nicolette F
Graafmans Wilco C
van der Veer Sabine N
de Vos Maartje LG
Jager Kitty J
Westert Gert P
van der Voort Peter HJ
Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change
Implementation Science
author_facet de Keizer Nicolette F
Graafmans Wilco C
van der Veer Sabine N
de Vos Maartje LG
Jager Kitty J
Westert Gert P
van der Voort Peter HJ
author_sort de Keizer Nicolette F
title Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change
title_short Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change
title_full Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change
title_fullStr Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change
title_full_unstemmed Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change
title_sort implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change
publisher BMC
series Implementation Science
issn 1748-5908
publishDate 2010-07-01
description <p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Quality indicators are increasingly used in healthcare but there are various barriers hindering their routine use. To promote the use of quality indicators, an exploration of the barriers to and facilitating factors for their implementation among healthcare professionals and managers of intensive care units (ICUs) is advocated.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All intensivists, ICU nurses, and managers (n = 142) working at 54 Dutch ICUs who participated in training sessions to support future implementation of quality indicators completed a questionnaire on perceived barriers and facilitators. Three types of barriers related to knowledge, attitude, and behaviour were assessed using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Behaviour-related barriers such as time constraints were most prominent (Mean Score, MS = 3.21), followed by barriers related to knowledge and attitude (MS = 3.62; MS = 4.12, respectively). Type of profession, age, and type of hospital were related to knowledge and behaviour. The facilitating factor perceived as most important by intensivists was administrative support (MS = 4.3; p = 0.02); for nurses, it was education (MS = 4.0; p = 0.01), and for managers, it was receiving feedback (MS = 4.5; p = 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results demonstrate that healthcare professionals and managers are familiar with using quality indicators to improve care, and that they have positive attitudes towards the implementation of quality indicators. Despite these facts, it is necessary to lower the barriers related to behavioural factors. In addition, as the barriers and facilitating factors differ among professions, age groups, and settings, tailored strategies are needed to implement quality indicators in daily practice.</p>
url http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/52
work_keys_str_mv AT dekeizernicolettef implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange
AT graafmanswilcoc implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange
AT vanderveersabinen implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange
AT devosmaartjelg implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange
AT jagerkittyj implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange
AT westertgertp implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange
AT vandervoortpeterhj implementingqualityindicatorsinintensivecareunitsexploringbarrierstoandfacilitatorsofbehaviourchange
_version_ 1725508697676840960