Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning

This paper aims to critically review current discussions on the “reinvention” of spatial planning, postulating an all-encompassing and unproblematic shift towards new rationales, scopes, actors and instruments in planning practice. Buzzwords are, among others, “governance”, “collaborative planning”...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mario Reimer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/11/4653
id doaj-8b06d57cdf514720bac75745aff926da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b06d57cdf514720bac75745aff926da2020-11-24T22:03:00ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502013-11-015114653467310.3390/su5114653Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial PlanningMario ReimerThis paper aims to critically review current discussions on the “reinvention” of spatial planning, postulating an all-encompassing and unproblematic shift towards new rationales, scopes, actors and instruments in planning practice. Buzzwords are, among others, “governance”, “collaborative planning” and the “communicative turn”. To overcome the somehow normative bias of these terms, the term “planning culture” is introduced to define a complex, multi-dimensional and dynamic institutional matrix combining formal and informal institutional patterns. Used in an analytical sense, it can help to better understand institutional change in spatial planning. Referring to recent conceptual debates about institutional transformation, the paper presents a six-stage model for institutional change in spatial planning, supporting it with an example from the Cologne/Bonn metropolitan region in Germany. The latter serves as an example for illustrating the institutional dynamics, but also the rigidities of planning cultural change. The paper concludes that a more thorough, “fine-grained” and empirically-grounded investigation of institutional transformation in spatial planning is necessary.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/11/4653spatial planningplanning cultureinstitutional change
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mario Reimer
spellingShingle Mario Reimer
Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning
Sustainability
spatial planning
planning culture
institutional change
author_facet Mario Reimer
author_sort Mario Reimer
title Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning
title_short Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning
title_full Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning
title_fullStr Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning
title_full_unstemmed Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning
title_sort planning cultures in transition: sustainability management and institutional change in spatial planning
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2013-11-01
description This paper aims to critically review current discussions on the “reinvention” of spatial planning, postulating an all-encompassing and unproblematic shift towards new rationales, scopes, actors and instruments in planning practice. Buzzwords are, among others, “governance”, “collaborative planning” and the “communicative turn”. To overcome the somehow normative bias of these terms, the term “planning culture” is introduced to define a complex, multi-dimensional and dynamic institutional matrix combining formal and informal institutional patterns. Used in an analytical sense, it can help to better understand institutional change in spatial planning. Referring to recent conceptual debates about institutional transformation, the paper presents a six-stage model for institutional change in spatial planning, supporting it with an example from the Cologne/Bonn metropolitan region in Germany. The latter serves as an example for illustrating the institutional dynamics, but also the rigidities of planning cultural change. The paper concludes that a more thorough, “fine-grained” and empirically-grounded investigation of institutional transformation in spatial planning is necessary.
topic spatial planning
planning culture
institutional change
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/11/4653
work_keys_str_mv AT marioreimer planningculturesintransitionsustainabilitymanagementandinstitutionalchangeinspatialplanning
_version_ 1725833564962947072