Fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.

PURPOSE: To establish if a positive impingement sign in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may result from entrapment of the fat pad located at the anterior head-neck junction of the upper femur. This fat pad is routinely removed before any cam lesion excision. METHODS: We report a prospective study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Narlaka Jayasekera, Alessandro Aprato, Richard N Villar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3935831?pdf=render
id doaj-8b0212922cf64032bb20ff1b0566a9bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b0212922cf64032bb20ff1b0566a9bc2020-11-24T21:51:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8350310.1371/journal.pone.0083503Fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.Narlaka JayasekeraAlessandro ApratoRichard N VillarPURPOSE: To establish if a positive impingement sign in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may result from entrapment of the fat pad located at the anterior head-neck junction of the upper femur. This fat pad is routinely removed before any cam lesion excision. METHODS: We report a prospective study of 142 consecutive hip arthroscopies for symptomatic FAI where the aim was to remove the arthroscopically identified area of impingement, not necessarily to create a spherical femoral head. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 92; 34 females, 58 males), where a cam-type bony FAI lesion was identified and excised in addition to the fat pad which overlay it, and Group 2 (n = 50; 29 females, 21 males) where the only identified point of impingement was a prominent fat pad. In this situation the fat pad was excised in isolation and the underlying bone preserved. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at six weeks, six months, one year and two years with a modified Harris hip score (mHHS). RESULTS: Both groups were comparable preoperatively for mean age, mean alpha angle and mean anterior offset ratio. Both groups improved significantly after surgery at all time points. However, Group 1 (fat pad and bone resection) demonstrated 16.0% improvement in mHHS by two years while for Group 2 (fat pad resection only) the improvement was 18.9% (p = 0.628). CONCLUSIONS: The fat pad found at the anterior head/neck junction of the hip joint can be a source of pain and we propose fat pad entrapment as a new, previously undescribed diagnosis. Our findings also suggest that a large number of cam lesions are being excised unnecessarily and that further efforts should be made to understand the role of the fat pad as a source of groin discomfort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3935831?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Narlaka Jayasekera
Alessandro Aprato
Richard N Villar
spellingShingle Narlaka Jayasekera
Alessandro Aprato
Richard N Villar
Fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Narlaka Jayasekera
Alessandro Aprato
Richard N Villar
author_sort Narlaka Jayasekera
title Fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.
title_short Fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.
title_full Fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.
title_fullStr Fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.
title_full_unstemmed Fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.
title_sort fat pad entrapment at the hip: a new diagnosis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description PURPOSE: To establish if a positive impingement sign in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may result from entrapment of the fat pad located at the anterior head-neck junction of the upper femur. This fat pad is routinely removed before any cam lesion excision. METHODS: We report a prospective study of 142 consecutive hip arthroscopies for symptomatic FAI where the aim was to remove the arthroscopically identified area of impingement, not necessarily to create a spherical femoral head. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 92; 34 females, 58 males), where a cam-type bony FAI lesion was identified and excised in addition to the fat pad which overlay it, and Group 2 (n = 50; 29 females, 21 males) where the only identified point of impingement was a prominent fat pad. In this situation the fat pad was excised in isolation and the underlying bone preserved. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at six weeks, six months, one year and two years with a modified Harris hip score (mHHS). RESULTS: Both groups were comparable preoperatively for mean age, mean alpha angle and mean anterior offset ratio. Both groups improved significantly after surgery at all time points. However, Group 1 (fat pad and bone resection) demonstrated 16.0% improvement in mHHS by two years while for Group 2 (fat pad resection only) the improvement was 18.9% (p = 0.628). CONCLUSIONS: The fat pad found at the anterior head/neck junction of the hip joint can be a source of pain and we propose fat pad entrapment as a new, previously undescribed diagnosis. Our findings also suggest that a large number of cam lesions are being excised unnecessarily and that further efforts should be made to understand the role of the fat pad as a source of groin discomfort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3935831?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT narlakajayasekera fatpadentrapmentatthehipanewdiagnosis
AT alessandroaprato fatpadentrapmentatthehipanewdiagnosis
AT richardnvillar fatpadentrapmentatthehipanewdiagnosis
_version_ 1725880300013092864