Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?

Background: To evaluate the long-term impact of preterm birth on respiratory function in female patients born preterm, we undertook spirometric examinations twice, as they reached the age of puberty, then follow-up examinations of part of the same cohort in adulthood. We sought evidence that preterm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk, Ida Wiszomirska, Magdalena Szturmowicz, Andrzej Magiera, Michalina Błażkiewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-07-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710595
id doaj-8b005285314b41cd9af8ddbf61b5e929
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b005285314b41cd9af8ddbf61b5e9292020-11-25T03:19:58ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease1753-46581753-46662017-07-011110.1177/1753465817710595Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?Katarzyna KaczmarczykIda WiszomirskaMagdalena SzturmowiczAndrzej MagieraMichalina BłażkiewiczBackground: To evaluate the long-term impact of preterm birth on respiratory function in female patients born preterm, we undertook spirometric examinations twice, as they reached the age of puberty, then follow-up examinations of part of the same cohort in adulthood. We sought evidence that preterm birth is correlated with poorer spirometric results into adulthood. Methods: A total of 70 girls (aged 12.2 ± 1.5 years in 1997) who had been born preterm (at 34.7 ± 1.86 weeks, none having experienced bronchopulmonary dysplasia) took part in spriometric examinations in 1997 and again in 1998. Of those, after a gap of 17 years, a group of 12 were successfully recontacted and participated in the 2015 examination as adults (then aged 27.6 ± 2.6 years, born at 34.5 ± 1.92 weeks). We compared spirometric results across the adolescent and adult examinations, and compared the adult results with an adult reference group. Results: The percentage values of FEV 1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s), FVC (forced vital capacity) and MVV (maximal voluntary ventilation) showed significant improvement between the two examinations in the early adolescent period. In adulthood, FEV 1 %pred (percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s) showed no statistically significant difference. The mean values of both FVC and FVC%pred (percentage predicted forced vital capacity) for the preterm-born group were lower than for the reference group, but this was not statistically significant. The preterm-born group showed lower values of such parameters as forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of FVC, MEF 25 (maximal expiratory flow at 25% of forced vital capacity) and FEV 1 /FVC as compared with the reference group, but again without statistical significance. Conclusions: (1) A somewhat below-norm level of respiratory parameters among preterm-born girls entering pubescence may attest to continued negative impact on their respiratory system. (2) A significant improvement in their spirometric results 1 year later may indicate that pubescence helps compensate for the earlier negative effect of preterm birth. (3) No significant differences were seen in lung function in preterm-born adults as compared with a reference group of adults, although the preterm-born group did exhibit lower values of all parameters studied and more frequent obstructive disorders.https://doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710595
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk
Ida Wiszomirska
Magdalena Szturmowicz
Andrzej Magiera
Michalina Błażkiewicz
spellingShingle Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk
Ida Wiszomirska
Magdalena Szturmowicz
Andrzej Magiera
Michalina Błażkiewicz
Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
author_facet Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk
Ida Wiszomirska
Magdalena Szturmowicz
Andrzej Magiera
Michalina Błażkiewicz
author_sort Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk
title Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?
title_short Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?
title_full Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?
title_fullStr Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?
title_full_unstemmed Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?
title_sort are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
issn 1753-4658
1753-4666
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Background: To evaluate the long-term impact of preterm birth on respiratory function in female patients born preterm, we undertook spirometric examinations twice, as they reached the age of puberty, then follow-up examinations of part of the same cohort in adulthood. We sought evidence that preterm birth is correlated with poorer spirometric results into adulthood. Methods: A total of 70 girls (aged 12.2 ± 1.5 years in 1997) who had been born preterm (at 34.7 ± 1.86 weeks, none having experienced bronchopulmonary dysplasia) took part in spriometric examinations in 1997 and again in 1998. Of those, after a gap of 17 years, a group of 12 were successfully recontacted and participated in the 2015 examination as adults (then aged 27.6 ± 2.6 years, born at 34.5 ± 1.92 weeks). We compared spirometric results across the adolescent and adult examinations, and compared the adult results with an adult reference group. Results: The percentage values of FEV 1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s), FVC (forced vital capacity) and MVV (maximal voluntary ventilation) showed significant improvement between the two examinations in the early adolescent period. In adulthood, FEV 1 %pred (percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s) showed no statistically significant difference. The mean values of both FVC and FVC%pred (percentage predicted forced vital capacity) for the preterm-born group were lower than for the reference group, but this was not statistically significant. The preterm-born group showed lower values of such parameters as forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of FVC, MEF 25 (maximal expiratory flow at 25% of forced vital capacity) and FEV 1 /FVC as compared with the reference group, but again without statistical significance. Conclusions: (1) A somewhat below-norm level of respiratory parameters among preterm-born girls entering pubescence may attest to continued negative impact on their respiratory system. (2) A significant improvement in their spirometric results 1 year later may indicate that pubescence helps compensate for the earlier negative effect of preterm birth. (3) No significant differences were seen in lung function in preterm-born adults as compared with a reference group of adults, although the preterm-born group did exhibit lower values of all parameters studied and more frequent obstructive disorders.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710595
work_keys_str_mv AT katarzynakaczmarczyk arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease
AT idawiszomirska arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease
AT magdalenaszturmowicz arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease
AT andrzejmagiera arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease
AT michalinabłazkiewicz arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease
_version_ 1724619943722352640