Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?
Background: To evaluate the long-term impact of preterm birth on respiratory function in female patients born preterm, we undertook spirometric examinations twice, as they reached the age of puberty, then follow-up examinations of part of the same cohort in adulthood. We sought evidence that preterm...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710595 |
id |
doaj-8b005285314b41cd9af8ddbf61b5e929 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8b005285314b41cd9af8ddbf61b5e9292020-11-25T03:19:58ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease1753-46581753-46662017-07-011110.1177/1753465817710595Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease?Katarzyna KaczmarczykIda WiszomirskaMagdalena SzturmowiczAndrzej MagieraMichalina BłażkiewiczBackground: To evaluate the long-term impact of preterm birth on respiratory function in female patients born preterm, we undertook spirometric examinations twice, as they reached the age of puberty, then follow-up examinations of part of the same cohort in adulthood. We sought evidence that preterm birth is correlated with poorer spirometric results into adulthood. Methods: A total of 70 girls (aged 12.2 ± 1.5 years in 1997) who had been born preterm (at 34.7 ± 1.86 weeks, none having experienced bronchopulmonary dysplasia) took part in spriometric examinations in 1997 and again in 1998. Of those, after a gap of 17 years, a group of 12 were successfully recontacted and participated in the 2015 examination as adults (then aged 27.6 ± 2.6 years, born at 34.5 ± 1.92 weeks). We compared spirometric results across the adolescent and adult examinations, and compared the adult results with an adult reference group. Results: The percentage values of FEV 1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s), FVC (forced vital capacity) and MVV (maximal voluntary ventilation) showed significant improvement between the two examinations in the early adolescent period. In adulthood, FEV 1 %pred (percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s) showed no statistically significant difference. The mean values of both FVC and FVC%pred (percentage predicted forced vital capacity) for the preterm-born group were lower than for the reference group, but this was not statistically significant. The preterm-born group showed lower values of such parameters as forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of FVC, MEF 25 (maximal expiratory flow at 25% of forced vital capacity) and FEV 1 /FVC as compared with the reference group, but again without statistical significance. Conclusions: (1) A somewhat below-norm level of respiratory parameters among preterm-born girls entering pubescence may attest to continued negative impact on their respiratory system. (2) A significant improvement in their spirometric results 1 year later may indicate that pubescence helps compensate for the earlier negative effect of preterm birth. (3) No significant differences were seen in lung function in preterm-born adults as compared with a reference group of adults, although the preterm-born group did exhibit lower values of all parameters studied and more frequent obstructive disorders.https://doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710595 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk Ida Wiszomirska Magdalena Szturmowicz Andrzej Magiera Michalina Błażkiewicz |
spellingShingle |
Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk Ida Wiszomirska Magdalena Szturmowicz Andrzej Magiera Michalina Błażkiewicz Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease? Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease |
author_facet |
Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk Ida Wiszomirska Magdalena Szturmowicz Andrzej Magiera Michalina Błażkiewicz |
author_sort |
Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk |
title |
Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease? |
title_short |
Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease? |
title_full |
Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease? |
title_fullStr |
Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease? |
title_sort |
are preterm-born survivors at risk of long-term respiratory disease? |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease |
issn |
1753-4658 1753-4666 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
Background: To evaluate the long-term impact of preterm birth on respiratory function in female patients born preterm, we undertook spirometric examinations twice, as they reached the age of puberty, then follow-up examinations of part of the same cohort in adulthood. We sought evidence that preterm birth is correlated with poorer spirometric results into adulthood. Methods: A total of 70 girls (aged 12.2 ± 1.5 years in 1997) who had been born preterm (at 34.7 ± 1.86 weeks, none having experienced bronchopulmonary dysplasia) took part in spriometric examinations in 1997 and again in 1998. Of those, after a gap of 17 years, a group of 12 were successfully recontacted and participated in the 2015 examination as adults (then aged 27.6 ± 2.6 years, born at 34.5 ± 1.92 weeks). We compared spirometric results across the adolescent and adult examinations, and compared the adult results with an adult reference group. Results: The percentage values of FEV 1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s), FVC (forced vital capacity) and MVV (maximal voluntary ventilation) showed significant improvement between the two examinations in the early adolescent period. In adulthood, FEV 1 %pred (percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s) showed no statistically significant difference. The mean values of both FVC and FVC%pred (percentage predicted forced vital capacity) for the preterm-born group were lower than for the reference group, but this was not statistically significant. The preterm-born group showed lower values of such parameters as forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of FVC, MEF 25 (maximal expiratory flow at 25% of forced vital capacity) and FEV 1 /FVC as compared with the reference group, but again without statistical significance. Conclusions: (1) A somewhat below-norm level of respiratory parameters among preterm-born girls entering pubescence may attest to continued negative impact on their respiratory system. (2) A significant improvement in their spirometric results 1 year later may indicate that pubescence helps compensate for the earlier negative effect of preterm birth. (3) No significant differences were seen in lung function in preterm-born adults as compared with a reference group of adults, although the preterm-born group did exhibit lower values of all parameters studied and more frequent obstructive disorders. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710595 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katarzynakaczmarczyk arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease AT idawiszomirska arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease AT magdalenaszturmowicz arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease AT andrzejmagiera arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease AT michalinabłazkiewicz arepretermbornsurvivorsatriskoflongtermrespiratorydisease |
_version_ |
1724619943722352640 |