Head CT for Minor Head Injury Presenting to the Emergency Department in the Era of Choosing Wisely

Introduction: The Choosing Wisely campaign currently recommends avoiding computed tomography (CT) of the head in low-risk emergency department (ED) patients with minor head injury, based on validated decision rules. However, the degree of adherence to this guideline in clinical practice is unknown....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John DeAngelis, Valerie Lou, Timmy Li, Henry Tran, Praneeta Bremjit, Molly McCann, Peter Crane, Courtney M.C. Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2017-07-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2p02k1rf
id doaj-8afa08317eb94a999d23bcbc4eddbf94
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8afa08317eb94a999d23bcbc4eddbf942020-11-24T23:19:36ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-90182017-07-0118510.5811/westjem.2017.6.33685wjem-18-821Head CT for Minor Head Injury Presenting to the Emergency Department in the Era of Choosing WiselyJohn DeAngelis0Valerie Lou1Timmy Li2Henry Tran3Praneeta Bremjit4Molly McCann5Peter Crane6Courtney M.C. Jones7University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New YorkUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New YorkUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New YorkUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New YorkUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New YorkUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New YorkUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New YorkUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New YorkIntroduction: The Choosing Wisely campaign currently recommends avoiding computed tomography (CT) of the head in low-risk emergency department (ED) patients with minor head injury, based on validated decision rules. However, the degree of adherence to this guideline in clinical practice is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence to the Choosing Wisely campaign’s recommendations regarding head CT imaging of patients with minor head injury in the ED. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult ED patients at a Level I trauma center. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who presented to the ED with minor head injury were identified via International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Medical record abstraction was conducted to determine the presence of clinical symptoms of the NEXUS II criteria, medical resource use, and head CT findings. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the study sample, and proportions were used to quantify guidelines adherence. Results: A total of 489 subjects met inclusion criteria. ED providers appropriately applied the Choosing Wisely criteria for 75.5% of patients, obtaining head CTs when indicated by the NEXUS II rule (41.5%), and not obtaining head CTs when the NEXUS II criteria were not met (34.0%). However, ED providers obtained non-indicated CTs in 23.1% of patients. Less than 2% of the sample did not receive a head CT when imaging was indicated by NEXUS II. Conclusion: ED providers in our sample had variable adherence to the Choosing Wisely head-CT recommendation, especially for patients who did not meet the NEXUS II criteria.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2p02k1rf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John DeAngelis
Valerie Lou
Timmy Li
Henry Tran
Praneeta Bremjit
Molly McCann
Peter Crane
Courtney M.C. Jones
spellingShingle John DeAngelis
Valerie Lou
Timmy Li
Henry Tran
Praneeta Bremjit
Molly McCann
Peter Crane
Courtney M.C. Jones
Head CT for Minor Head Injury Presenting to the Emergency Department in the Era of Choosing Wisely
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
author_facet John DeAngelis
Valerie Lou
Timmy Li
Henry Tran
Praneeta Bremjit
Molly McCann
Peter Crane
Courtney M.C. Jones
author_sort John DeAngelis
title Head CT for Minor Head Injury Presenting to the Emergency Department in the Era of Choosing Wisely
title_short Head CT for Minor Head Injury Presenting to the Emergency Department in the Era of Choosing Wisely
title_full Head CT for Minor Head Injury Presenting to the Emergency Department in the Era of Choosing Wisely
title_fullStr Head CT for Minor Head Injury Presenting to the Emergency Department in the Era of Choosing Wisely
title_full_unstemmed Head CT for Minor Head Injury Presenting to the Emergency Department in the Era of Choosing Wisely
title_sort head ct for minor head injury presenting to the emergency department in the era of choosing wisely
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 1936-9018
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Introduction: The Choosing Wisely campaign currently recommends avoiding computed tomography (CT) of the head in low-risk emergency department (ED) patients with minor head injury, based on validated decision rules. However, the degree of adherence to this guideline in clinical practice is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence to the Choosing Wisely campaign’s recommendations regarding head CT imaging of patients with minor head injury in the ED. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult ED patients at a Level I trauma center. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who presented to the ED with minor head injury were identified via International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Medical record abstraction was conducted to determine the presence of clinical symptoms of the NEXUS II criteria, medical resource use, and head CT findings. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the study sample, and proportions were used to quantify guidelines adherence. Results: A total of 489 subjects met inclusion criteria. ED providers appropriately applied the Choosing Wisely criteria for 75.5% of patients, obtaining head CTs when indicated by the NEXUS II rule (41.5%), and not obtaining head CTs when the NEXUS II criteria were not met (34.0%). However, ED providers obtained non-indicated CTs in 23.1% of patients. Less than 2% of the sample did not receive a head CT when imaging was indicated by NEXUS II. Conclusion: ED providers in our sample had variable adherence to the Choosing Wisely head-CT recommendation, especially for patients who did not meet the NEXUS II criteria.
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2p02k1rf
work_keys_str_mv AT johndeangelis headctforminorheadinjurypresentingtotheemergencydepartmentintheeraofchoosingwisely
AT valerielou headctforminorheadinjurypresentingtotheemergencydepartmentintheeraofchoosingwisely
AT timmyli headctforminorheadinjurypresentingtotheemergencydepartmentintheeraofchoosingwisely
AT henrytran headctforminorheadinjurypresentingtotheemergencydepartmentintheeraofchoosingwisely
AT praneetabremjit headctforminorheadinjurypresentingtotheemergencydepartmentintheeraofchoosingwisely
AT mollymccann headctforminorheadinjurypresentingtotheemergencydepartmentintheeraofchoosingwisely
AT petercrane headctforminorheadinjurypresentingtotheemergencydepartmentintheeraofchoosingwisely
AT courtneymcjones headctforminorheadinjurypresentingtotheemergencydepartmentintheeraofchoosingwisely
_version_ 1725577987331457024