The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Functional treatment is a widely used and generally accepted treatment for ankle sprain. A meta-analysis comparing the different functional treatment options could not make definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness, and unti...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/81 |
id |
doaj-8af5ba33ae6342cc89b090d933a9a69b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8af5ba33ae6342cc89b090d933a9a69b2020-11-24T22:05:43ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742012-05-011318110.1186/1471-2474-13-81The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trialLardenoye SachaTheunissen EdCleffken BerryBrink Peter RGde Bie Rob APoeze Martijn<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Functional treatment is a widely used and generally accepted treatment for ankle sprain. A meta-analysis comparing the different functional treatment options could not make definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness, and until now, little was known about patient satisfaction in relation to the outcome.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with acute ankle sprain received rest, ice, compression and elevation with an compressive bandage at the emergency department. After 5-7 days, 100 patients with grade II and III sprains were randomized into two groups: one group was treated with tape and the other with a semi-rigid ankle brace, both for 4 weeks. Post-injury physical and proprioceptive training was standardized. As primary outcome parameter patient satisfaction and skin complications were evaluated using a predefined questionnaire and numeric rating scale. As secondary outcome parameter the ankle joint function was assessed using the Karlsson scoring scale and range of motion.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patient-reported comfort and satisfaction during treatment with a semi-rigid brace was significantly increased. The rate of skin complication in this group was significantly lower compared to the tape group (14.6% versus 59.1%, P < 0.0001). Functional outcome of the ankle joint was similar between the two treatment groups, as well as reported pain.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Treatment of acute ankle sprain with semi-rigid brace leads to significantly higher patient comfort and satisfaction, both with similar good outcome.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/81 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lardenoye Sacha Theunissen Ed Cleffken Berry Brink Peter RG de Bie Rob A Poeze Martijn |
spellingShingle |
Lardenoye Sacha Theunissen Ed Cleffken Berry Brink Peter RG de Bie Rob A Poeze Martijn The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
author_facet |
Lardenoye Sacha Theunissen Ed Cleffken Berry Brink Peter RG de Bie Rob A Poeze Martijn |
author_sort |
Lardenoye Sacha |
title |
The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2012-05-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Functional treatment is a widely used and generally accepted treatment for ankle sprain. A meta-analysis comparing the different functional treatment options could not make definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness, and until now, little was known about patient satisfaction in relation to the outcome.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with acute ankle sprain received rest, ice, compression and elevation with an compressive bandage at the emergency department. After 5-7 days, 100 patients with grade II and III sprains were randomized into two groups: one group was treated with tape and the other with a semi-rigid ankle brace, both for 4 weeks. Post-injury physical and proprioceptive training was standardized. As primary outcome parameter patient satisfaction and skin complications were evaluated using a predefined questionnaire and numeric rating scale. As secondary outcome parameter the ankle joint function was assessed using the Karlsson scoring scale and range of motion.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patient-reported comfort and satisfaction during treatment with a semi-rigid brace was significantly increased. The rate of skin complication in this group was significantly lower compared to the tape group (14.6% versus 59.1%, P < 0.0001). Functional outcome of the ankle joint was similar between the two treatment groups, as well as reported pain.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Treatment of acute ankle sprain with semi-rigid brace leads to significantly higher patient comfort and satisfaction, both with similar good outcome.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/81 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lardenoyesacha theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT theunissened theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cleffkenberry theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brinkpeterrg theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT debieroba theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT poezemartijn theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lardenoyesacha effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT theunissened effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cleffkenberry effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brinkpeterrg effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT debieroba effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT poezemartijn effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1725825107478183936 |