The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Functional treatment is a widely used and generally accepted treatment for ankle sprain. A meta-analysis comparing the different functional treatment options could not make definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness, and unti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lardenoye Sacha, Theunissen Ed, Cleffken Berry, Brink Peter RG, de Bie Rob A, Poeze Martijn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-05-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/81
id doaj-8af5ba33ae6342cc89b090d933a9a69b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8af5ba33ae6342cc89b090d933a9a69b2020-11-24T22:05:43ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742012-05-011318110.1186/1471-2474-13-81The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trialLardenoye SachaTheunissen EdCleffken BerryBrink Peter RGde Bie Rob APoeze Martijn<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Functional treatment is a widely used and generally accepted treatment for ankle sprain. A meta-analysis comparing the different functional treatment options could not make definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness, and until now, little was known about patient satisfaction in relation to the outcome.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with acute ankle sprain received rest, ice, compression and elevation with an compressive bandage at the emergency department. After 5-7 days, 100 patients with grade II and III sprains were randomized into two groups: one group was treated with tape and the other with a semi-rigid ankle brace, both for 4 weeks. Post-injury physical and proprioceptive training was standardized. As primary outcome parameter patient satisfaction and skin complications were evaluated using a predefined questionnaire and numeric rating scale. As secondary outcome parameter the ankle joint function was assessed using the Karlsson scoring scale and range of motion.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patient-reported comfort and satisfaction during treatment with a semi-rigid brace was significantly increased. The rate of skin complication in this group was significantly lower compared to the tape group (14.6% versus 59.1%, P < 0.0001). Functional outcome of the ankle joint was similar between the two treatment groups, as well as reported pain.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Treatment of acute ankle sprain with semi-rigid brace leads to significantly higher patient comfort and satisfaction, both with similar good outcome.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/81
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lardenoye Sacha
Theunissen Ed
Cleffken Berry
Brink Peter RG
de Bie Rob A
Poeze Martijn
spellingShingle Lardenoye Sacha
Theunissen Ed
Cleffken Berry
Brink Peter RG
de Bie Rob A
Poeze Martijn
The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
author_facet Lardenoye Sacha
Theunissen Ed
Cleffken Berry
Brink Peter RG
de Bie Rob A
Poeze Martijn
author_sort Lardenoye Sacha
title The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2012-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Functional treatment is a widely used and generally accepted treatment for ankle sprain. A meta-analysis comparing the different functional treatment options could not make definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness, and until now, little was known about patient satisfaction in relation to the outcome.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with acute ankle sprain received rest, ice, compression and elevation with an compressive bandage at the emergency department. After 5-7 days, 100 patients with grade II and III sprains were randomized into two groups: one group was treated with tape and the other with a semi-rigid ankle brace, both for 4 weeks. Post-injury physical and proprioceptive training was standardized. As primary outcome parameter patient satisfaction and skin complications were evaluated using a predefined questionnaire and numeric rating scale. As secondary outcome parameter the ankle joint function was assessed using the Karlsson scoring scale and range of motion.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patient-reported comfort and satisfaction during treatment with a semi-rigid brace was significantly increased. The rate of skin complication in this group was significantly lower compared to the tape group (14.6% versus 59.1%, P < 0.0001). Functional outcome of the ankle joint was similar between the two treatment groups, as well as reported pain.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Treatment of acute ankle sprain with semi-rigid brace leads to significantly higher patient comfort and satisfaction, both with similar good outcome.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/81
work_keys_str_mv AT lardenoyesacha theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT theunissened theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cleffkenberry theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brinkpeterrg theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT debieroba theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT poezemartijn theeffectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lardenoyesacha effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT theunissened effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cleffkenberry effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brinkpeterrg effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT debieroba effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT poezemartijn effectoftapingversussemirigidbracingonpatientoutcomeandsatisfactioninanklesprainsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725825107478183936