Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task?
Learning can modulate various forms of action control, including response inhibition. People may learn associations between specific stimuli and the acts of going or stopping, influencing task performance. The present study tested whether people also learn associations between specific stimuli and f...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cognition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/73 |
id |
doaj-8aec8546deec45b9afc8680385ad0f73 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8aec8546deec45b9afc8680385ad0f732020-11-25T02:03:06ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202019-07-012110.5334/joc.7367Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task?Maisy Best0Frederick Verbruggen1University of GlasgowGhent UniversityLearning can modulate various forms of action control, including response inhibition. People may learn associations between specific stimuli and the acts of going or stopping, influencing task performance. The present study tested whether people also learn associations between specific stimuli and features of the stop or no-go signal used in the task. Across two experiments, participants performed a response-inhibition task in which the contingencies between specific stimuli and the spatial locations of the ‘go’ and ‘withhold’ signals were manipulated. The contingencies between specific stimuli and either going or withholding were also manipulated, such that a subset of stimuli were associated with responding and another subset with withholding a response. Although there was clear evidence that participants learned to associate specific stimuli with the acts of going or withholding, there was no evidence that participants acquired the spatial signal-location associations. The absence of signal learning was supported by Bayesian analyses. These findings challenge our previous proposals that learning always influences signal-detection processes in response-inhibition tasks where features of the signal remain the same throughout the task.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/73Cognitive ControlAttentionExecutive functionsLearning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maisy Best Frederick Verbruggen |
spellingShingle |
Maisy Best Frederick Verbruggen Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task? Journal of Cognition Cognitive Control Attention Executive functions Learning |
author_facet |
Maisy Best Frederick Verbruggen |
author_sort |
Maisy Best |
title |
Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task? |
title_short |
Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task? |
title_full |
Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task? |
title_fullStr |
Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task? |
title_sort |
does learning influence the detection of signals in a response-inhibition task? |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Journal of Cognition |
issn |
2514-4820 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Learning can modulate various forms of action control, including response inhibition. People may learn associations between specific stimuli and the acts of going or stopping, influencing task performance. The present study tested whether people also learn associations between specific stimuli and features of the stop or no-go signal used in the task. Across two experiments, participants performed a response-inhibition task in which the contingencies between specific stimuli and the spatial locations of the ‘go’ and ‘withhold’ signals were manipulated. The contingencies between specific stimuli and either going or withholding were also manipulated, such that a subset of stimuli were associated with responding and another subset with withholding a response. Although there was clear evidence that participants learned to associate specific stimuli with the acts of going or withholding, there was no evidence that participants acquired the spatial signal-location associations. The absence of signal learning was supported by Bayesian analyses. These findings challenge our previous proposals that learning always influences signal-detection processes in response-inhibition tasks where features of the signal remain the same throughout the task. |
topic |
Cognitive Control Attention Executive functions Learning |
url |
https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/73 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maisybest doeslearninginfluencethedetectionofsignalsinaresponseinhibitiontask AT frederickverbruggen doeslearninginfluencethedetectionofsignalsinaresponseinhibitiontask |
_version_ |
1724949530062880768 |