Development by design in Colombia: making mitigation decisions consistent with conservation outcomes.
Mitigation policy and regulatory frameworks are consistent in their strong support for the mitigation hierarchy of: (1) avoiding impacts, (2) minimizing impacts, and then (3) offsetting/compensating for residual impacts. While mitigation frameworks require developers to avoid, minimize and restore b...
Main Authors: | Shirley Saenz, Tomas Walschburger, Juan Carlos González, Jorge León, Bruce McKenney, Joseph Kiesecker |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3855343?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
A Framework for Implementing and Valuing Biodiversity Offsets in Colombia: A Landscape Scale Perspective
by: Shirley Saenz, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01) -
Development by Design in Western Australia: Overcoming Offset Obstacles
by: James Fitzsimons, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Subarachnoid versus nonsubarachnoid traumatic brain injuries: The impact of decision-making on patient safety
by: Brandon Diaz, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Making space: Putting landscape‐level mitigation into practice in Mongolia
by: Michael Heiner, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
(In)consistency of the Selection of the Method of Multiplicative Decision-Making
by: Katarina Račić, BSc, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)