Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round

Serbia has had a long history of privatization. It commenced in 1990 and was only fully completed, as defined by the privatization legislation, in 2015. The reasons for this are many and complex and the paper provides a short historical overview. Privatization, however, began in earnest aft...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vujačić Ivan, Petrović-Vujačić Jelica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Economics, Belgrade 2016-01-01
Series:Ekonomski Anali
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2016/0013-32641609045V.pdf
id doaj-8ae2e467b7bd432086bd23da50afde0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ae2e467b7bd432086bd23da50afde0a2020-11-24T23:32:23ZengFaculty of Economics, BelgradeEkonomski Anali0013-32641820-73752016-01-0161209457710.2298/EKA1609045V0013-32641609045VPrivatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last roundVujačić Ivan0Petrović-Vujačić Jelica1Faculty of Economics, BelgradeFaculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, BelgradeSerbia has had a long history of privatization. It commenced in 1990 and was only fully completed, as defined by the privatization legislation, in 2015. The reasons for this are many and complex and the paper provides a short historical overview. Privatization, however, began in earnest after the democratic revolution of 2000 and the paper analyses the political motives behind the adoption of the current model. The paper goes on to explain the model design, as well as its dynamics and results. The analysis probes more deeply into the specific weaknesses of auction implementation, showing that an alternative approach could have produced better results in terms of revenue. The specific institutional flaws that led to a high failure rate in the privatization of companies are identified and analysed. These weaknesses lie in the design, implementation, and monitoring, which led to results that were not in line with the goals of the privatization process. The designers of the privatization model gave scant attention to broader institutional coherence, which enabled largescale manipulation of the process. In some cases this enabled motives unrelated to the future of the firm being privatized to dominate the process. Finally, the scope of the last round of privatization in Serbia, which commenced in June 2015, and the probable results are discussed.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2016/0013-32641609045V.pdfprivatizationtransitioninstitutional designSerbia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vujačić Ivan
Petrović-Vujačić Jelica
spellingShingle Vujačić Ivan
Petrović-Vujačić Jelica
Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round
Ekonomski Anali
privatization
transition
institutional design
Serbia
author_facet Vujačić Ivan
Petrović-Vujačić Jelica
author_sort Vujačić Ivan
title Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round
title_short Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round
title_full Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round
title_fullStr Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round
title_full_unstemmed Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round
title_sort privatization in serbia - an assesment before the last round
publisher Faculty of Economics, Belgrade
series Ekonomski Anali
issn 0013-3264
1820-7375
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Serbia has had a long history of privatization. It commenced in 1990 and was only fully completed, as defined by the privatization legislation, in 2015. The reasons for this are many and complex and the paper provides a short historical overview. Privatization, however, began in earnest after the democratic revolution of 2000 and the paper analyses the political motives behind the adoption of the current model. The paper goes on to explain the model design, as well as its dynamics and results. The analysis probes more deeply into the specific weaknesses of auction implementation, showing that an alternative approach could have produced better results in terms of revenue. The specific institutional flaws that led to a high failure rate in the privatization of companies are identified and analysed. These weaknesses lie in the design, implementation, and monitoring, which led to results that were not in line with the goals of the privatization process. The designers of the privatization model gave scant attention to broader institutional coherence, which enabled largescale manipulation of the process. In some cases this enabled motives unrelated to the future of the firm being privatized to dominate the process. Finally, the scope of the last round of privatization in Serbia, which commenced in June 2015, and the probable results are discussed.
topic privatization
transition
institutional design
Serbia
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2016/0013-32641609045V.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vujacicivan privatizationinserbiaanassesmentbeforethelastround
AT petrovicvujacicjelica privatizationinserbiaanassesmentbeforethelastround
_version_ 1725534332935733248