Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round
Serbia has had a long history of privatization. It commenced in 1990 and was only fully completed, as defined by the privatization legislation, in 2015. The reasons for this are many and complex and the paper provides a short historical overview. Privatization, however, began in earnest aft...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Economics, Belgrade
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Ekonomski Anali |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2016/0013-32641609045V.pdf |
id |
doaj-8ae2e467b7bd432086bd23da50afde0a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8ae2e467b7bd432086bd23da50afde0a2020-11-24T23:32:23ZengFaculty of Economics, BelgradeEkonomski Anali0013-32641820-73752016-01-0161209457710.2298/EKA1609045V0013-32641609045VPrivatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last roundVujačić Ivan0Petrović-Vujačić Jelica1Faculty of Economics, BelgradeFaculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, BelgradeSerbia has had a long history of privatization. It commenced in 1990 and was only fully completed, as defined by the privatization legislation, in 2015. The reasons for this are many and complex and the paper provides a short historical overview. Privatization, however, began in earnest after the democratic revolution of 2000 and the paper analyses the political motives behind the adoption of the current model. The paper goes on to explain the model design, as well as its dynamics and results. The analysis probes more deeply into the specific weaknesses of auction implementation, showing that an alternative approach could have produced better results in terms of revenue. The specific institutional flaws that led to a high failure rate in the privatization of companies are identified and analysed. These weaknesses lie in the design, implementation, and monitoring, which led to results that were not in line with the goals of the privatization process. The designers of the privatization model gave scant attention to broader institutional coherence, which enabled largescale manipulation of the process. In some cases this enabled motives unrelated to the future of the firm being privatized to dominate the process. Finally, the scope of the last round of privatization in Serbia, which commenced in June 2015, and the probable results are discussed.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2016/0013-32641609045V.pdfprivatizationtransitioninstitutional designSerbia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vujačić Ivan Petrović-Vujačić Jelica |
spellingShingle |
Vujačić Ivan Petrović-Vujačić Jelica Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round Ekonomski Anali privatization transition institutional design Serbia |
author_facet |
Vujačić Ivan Petrović-Vujačić Jelica |
author_sort |
Vujačić Ivan |
title |
Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round |
title_short |
Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round |
title_full |
Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round |
title_fullStr |
Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round |
title_full_unstemmed |
Privatization in Serbia - an assesment before the last round |
title_sort |
privatization in serbia - an assesment before the last round |
publisher |
Faculty of Economics, Belgrade |
series |
Ekonomski Anali |
issn |
0013-3264 1820-7375 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Serbia has had a long history of privatization. It commenced in 1990 and was
only fully completed, as defined by the privatization legislation, in 2015.
The reasons for this are many and complex and the paper provides a short
historical overview. Privatization, however, began in earnest after the
democratic revolution of 2000 and the paper analyses the political motives
behind the adoption of the current model. The paper goes on to explain the
model design, as well as its dynamics and results. The analysis probes more
deeply into the specific weaknesses of auction implementation, showing that
an alternative approach could have produced better results in terms of
revenue. The specific institutional flaws that led to a high failure rate in
the privatization of companies are identified and analysed. These weaknesses
lie in the design, implementation, and monitoring, which led to results that
were not in line with the goals of the privatization process. The designers
of the privatization model gave scant attention to broader institutional
coherence, which enabled largescale manipulation of the process. In some
cases this enabled motives unrelated to the future of the firm being
privatized to dominate the process. Finally, the scope of the last round of
privatization in Serbia, which commenced in June 2015, and the probable
results are discussed. |
topic |
privatization transition institutional design Serbia |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2016/0013-32641609045V.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vujacicivan privatizationinserbiaanassesmentbeforethelastround AT petrovicvujacicjelica privatizationinserbiaanassesmentbeforethelastround |
_version_ |
1725534332935733248 |