The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness
The study aimed at determining the validity of students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness in Al al-Bayt university inJordan through Specifying and estimating the parameters of a two-factor confirmatory factor model which includes three first-order factorsreflect the teaching effectiven...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
King Saud University
2010-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Islamic Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0022-02-02_1.pdf |
id |
doaj-8adf5b9bd033423c920cc3b36e9d9e8a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8adf5b9bd033423c920cc3b36e9d9e8a2020-11-25T01:06:37ZaraKing Saud UniversityJournal of Islamic Studies1658-63011658-63012010-05-01222247261The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching EffectivenessAbdelhafez Q. Al-ShayebThe study aimed at determining the validity of students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness in Al al-Bayt university inJordan through Specifying and estimating the parameters of a two-factor confirmatory factor model which includes three first-order factorsreflect the teaching effectiveness components , i.e., instruction organization and teaching techniques. communication with students, andevaluation of students, as measured by the teaching effectiveness instrument being used in the university, and one scoond-order factor , i.e.,lecturer's charismlas measured by one item added to the instrument. Data for this study were collected from , 1217, male and femaleundergraduate college students as they evaluated teaching effectiveness of , 13} instructors in the second semester of 2005/2006 academicyear. The results revealed an acceptable model fit to the data. However, the charisma factor explained 74%, 6 l%, and 41% of the variationin the three aforementioned components of teaching effectiveness instrument respectively. The findings suggest that students' ratings ofteaching effectiveness do not reflect actual teaching effectiveness. It is argued that a central factor "charisma" exists and influences thestudents’ ratings.http://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0022-02-02_1.pdfStudents' RatingsTeaching Effectiveness |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Arabic |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb |
spellingShingle |
Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness Journal of Islamic Studies Students' Ratings Teaching Effectiveness |
author_facet |
Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb |
author_sort |
Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb |
title |
The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness |
title_short |
The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness |
title_full |
The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness |
title_fullStr |
The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness |
title_sort |
validity of students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness |
publisher |
King Saud University |
series |
Journal of Islamic Studies |
issn |
1658-6301 1658-6301 |
publishDate |
2010-05-01 |
description |
The study aimed at determining the validity of students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness in Al al-Bayt university inJordan through Specifying and estimating the parameters of a two-factor confirmatory factor model which includes three first-order factorsreflect the teaching effectiveness components , i.e., instruction organization and teaching techniques. communication with students, andevaluation of students, as measured by the teaching effectiveness instrument being used in the university, and one scoond-order factor , i.e.,lecturer's charismlas measured by one item added to the instrument. Data for this study were collected from , 1217, male and femaleundergraduate college students as they evaluated teaching effectiveness of , 13} instructors in the second semester of 2005/2006 academicyear. The results revealed an acceptable model fit to the data. However, the charisma factor explained 74%, 6 l%, and 41% of the variationin the three aforementioned components of teaching effectiveness instrument respectively. The findings suggest that students' ratings ofteaching effectiveness do not reflect actual teaching effectiveness. It is argued that a central factor "charisma" exists and influences thestudents’ ratings. |
topic |
Students' Ratings Teaching Effectiveness |
url |
http://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0022-02-02_1.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT abdelhafezqalshayeb thevalidityofstudentsratingsofcollegeteachingeffectiveness AT abdelhafezqalshayeb validityofstudentsratingsofcollegeteachingeffectiveness |
_version_ |
1725189215021432832 |