The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness

The study aimed at determining the validity of students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness in Al al-Bayt university inJordan through Specifying and estimating the parameters of a two-factor confirmatory factor model which includes three first-order factorsreflect the teaching effectiven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: King Saud University 2010-05-01
Series:Journal of Islamic Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0022-02-02_1.pdf
id doaj-8adf5b9bd033423c920cc3b36e9d9e8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8adf5b9bd033423c920cc3b36e9d9e8a2020-11-25T01:06:37ZaraKing Saud UniversityJournal of Islamic Studies1658-63011658-63012010-05-01222247261The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching EffectivenessAbdelhafez Q. Al-ShayebThe study aimed at determining the validity of students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness in Al al-Bayt university inJordan through Specifying and estimating the parameters of a two-factor confirmatory factor model which includes three first-order factorsreflect the teaching effectiveness components , i.e., instruction organization and teaching techniques. communication with students, andevaluation of students, as measured by the teaching effectiveness instrument being used in the university, and one scoond-order factor , i.e.,lecturer's charismlas measured by one item added to the instrument. Data for this study were collected from , 1217, male and femaleundergraduate college students as they evaluated teaching effectiveness of , 13} instructors in the second semester of 2005/2006 academicyear. The results revealed an acceptable model fit to the data. However, the charisma factor explained 74%, 6 l%, and 41% of the variationin the three aforementioned components of teaching effectiveness instrument respectively. The findings suggest that students' ratings ofteaching effectiveness do not reflect actual teaching effectiveness. It is argued that a central factor "charisma" exists and influences thestudents’ ratings.http://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0022-02-02_1.pdfStudents' RatingsTeaching Effectiveness
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb
spellingShingle Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb
The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness
Journal of Islamic Studies
Students' Ratings
Teaching Effectiveness
author_facet Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb
author_sort Abdelhafez Q. Al-Shayeb
title The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness
title_short The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness
title_full The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness
title_fullStr The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed The Validity of Students' Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness
title_sort validity of students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness
publisher King Saud University
series Journal of Islamic Studies
issn 1658-6301
1658-6301
publishDate 2010-05-01
description The study aimed at determining the validity of students' ratings of college teaching effectiveness in Al al-Bayt university inJordan through Specifying and estimating the parameters of a two-factor confirmatory factor model which includes three first-order factorsreflect the teaching effectiveness components , i.e., instruction organization and teaching techniques. communication with students, andevaluation of students, as measured by the teaching effectiveness instrument being used in the university, and one scoond-order factor , i.e.,lecturer's charismlas measured by one item added to the instrument. Data for this study were collected from , 1217, male and femaleundergraduate college students as they evaluated teaching effectiveness of , 13} instructors in the second semester of 2005/2006 academicyear. The results revealed an acceptable model fit to the data. However, the charisma factor explained 74%, 6 l%, and 41% of the variationin the three aforementioned components of teaching effectiveness instrument respectively. The findings suggest that students' ratings ofteaching effectiveness do not reflect actual teaching effectiveness. It is argued that a central factor "charisma" exists and influences thestudents’ ratings.
topic Students' Ratings
Teaching Effectiveness
url http://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/0022-02-02_1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelhafezqalshayeb thevalidityofstudentsratingsofcollegeteachingeffectiveness
AT abdelhafezqalshayeb validityofstudentsratingsofcollegeteachingeffectiveness
_version_ 1725189215021432832