Differences in Forest Use Strategies for Cash Income between Households Living outside and inside Selectively Logged Production Forests in Myanmar

In many tropical regions, rural households often depend on forests for cash income, but there is still little knowledge on how forest use strategies differ among people living in different locations. This study aimed to detect differences in forest use strategies and forest cash income dependency be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thein Saung, Nobuya Mizoue, Tetsuji Ota, Tsuyoshi Kajisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/12/1263
id doaj-8accc74239cf484fb442db31bbfdd3cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8accc74239cf484fb442db31bbfdd3cb2020-11-29T10:20:50ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072020-11-01111263126310.3390/f11121263Differences in Forest Use Strategies for Cash Income between Households Living outside and inside Selectively Logged Production Forests in MyanmarThein Saung0Nobuya Mizoue1Tetsuji Ota2Tsuyoshi Kajisa3Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Fukuoka 819-0395, JapanFaculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Fukuoka 819-0395, JapanFaculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Fukuoka 819-0395, JapanFaculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-8580, JapanIn many tropical regions, rural households often depend on forests for cash income, but there is still little knowledge on how forest use strategies differ among people living in different locations. This study aimed to detect differences in forest use strategies and forest cash income dependency between households living outside and inside selectively logged production forests, known as Reserved Forests (RFs), in Bago Township, Myanmar. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 146 and 48 households living outside and inside the RFs, respectively. The inside-households (encroachers) had a much higher forest cash income dependency (83%), with charcoal production as the main forest use activity, than the outside-households (32%), with bamboo cutting as the main activity. Higher forest dependency was found for outside-households that had less farmland, better accessibility to forest and more recognition of prohibited access to RFs in forest law. This study revealed evidence of substantial forest use for commercial purposes in RFs by households living both inside and outside the RFs, despite local recognition of the illegality of the use. Implementing community forestry practices for local communities may be a better option to reduce illegal dependence on selectively logged production forests.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/12/1263bamboocharcoalencroachmentforest dependencyproduction forest
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thein Saung
Nobuya Mizoue
Tetsuji Ota
Tsuyoshi Kajisa
spellingShingle Thein Saung
Nobuya Mizoue
Tetsuji Ota
Tsuyoshi Kajisa
Differences in Forest Use Strategies for Cash Income between Households Living outside and inside Selectively Logged Production Forests in Myanmar
Forests
bamboo
charcoal
encroachment
forest dependency
production forest
author_facet Thein Saung
Nobuya Mizoue
Tetsuji Ota
Tsuyoshi Kajisa
author_sort Thein Saung
title Differences in Forest Use Strategies for Cash Income between Households Living outside and inside Selectively Logged Production Forests in Myanmar
title_short Differences in Forest Use Strategies for Cash Income between Households Living outside and inside Selectively Logged Production Forests in Myanmar
title_full Differences in Forest Use Strategies for Cash Income between Households Living outside and inside Selectively Logged Production Forests in Myanmar
title_fullStr Differences in Forest Use Strategies for Cash Income between Households Living outside and inside Selectively Logged Production Forests in Myanmar
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Forest Use Strategies for Cash Income between Households Living outside and inside Selectively Logged Production Forests in Myanmar
title_sort differences in forest use strategies for cash income between households living outside and inside selectively logged production forests in myanmar
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2020-11-01
description In many tropical regions, rural households often depend on forests for cash income, but there is still little knowledge on how forest use strategies differ among people living in different locations. This study aimed to detect differences in forest use strategies and forest cash income dependency between households living outside and inside selectively logged production forests, known as Reserved Forests (RFs), in Bago Township, Myanmar. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 146 and 48 households living outside and inside the RFs, respectively. The inside-households (encroachers) had a much higher forest cash income dependency (83%), with charcoal production as the main forest use activity, than the outside-households (32%), with bamboo cutting as the main activity. Higher forest dependency was found for outside-households that had less farmland, better accessibility to forest and more recognition of prohibited access to RFs in forest law. This study revealed evidence of substantial forest use for commercial purposes in RFs by households living both inside and outside the RFs, despite local recognition of the illegality of the use. Implementing community forestry practices for local communities may be a better option to reduce illegal dependence on selectively logged production forests.
topic bamboo
charcoal
encroachment
forest dependency
production forest
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/12/1263
work_keys_str_mv AT theinsaung differencesinforestusestrategiesforcashincomebetweenhouseholdslivingoutsideandinsideselectivelyloggedproductionforestsinmyanmar
AT nobuyamizoue differencesinforestusestrategiesforcashincomebetweenhouseholdslivingoutsideandinsideselectivelyloggedproductionforestsinmyanmar
AT tetsujiota differencesinforestusestrategiesforcashincomebetweenhouseholdslivingoutsideandinsideselectivelyloggedproductionforestsinmyanmar
AT tsuyoshikajisa differencesinforestusestrategiesforcashincomebetweenhouseholdslivingoutsideandinsideselectivelyloggedproductionforestsinmyanmar
_version_ 1724412425994764288