"Der Mench [sic] ist ein Gewohnheitstier": Beckett and Habit
Habit plays an ambiguous role in Samuel Beckett's oeuvre: on the one hand, as he claims in his essay Proust, habit is merely considered as “the guarantee of a dull inviolability”, a protective screen dividing the subject from reality; on the other hand habit, as the area of friction between act...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Università degli Studi di Torino
2014-12-01
|
| Series: | CoSMO |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/COSMO/article/view/740 |
| Summary: | Habit plays an ambiguous role in Samuel Beckett's oeuvre: on the one hand, as he claims in his essay Proust, habit is merely considered as “the guarantee of a dull inviolability”, a protective screen dividing the subject from reality; on the other hand habit, as the area of friction between activity and passivity, is the object of extensive meditation and a pivotal element in the representation of Beckett's characters. In this paper I intend to investigate this ambiguity in the light of Félix Ravaisson's and Maine de Biran's philosophical reflection on the theme of habit and though a reading of the short story All Strange Away |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2281-6658 |