Independent Museums, Heritage, and the Shape of Museum Studies

Reflecting on the British heritage debates of the 1980s and 1990s, Robert Lumley asserted that they continue to influence Anglo-American definitions and perceptions of that subject. This article suggests that they had a correlative impact upon the parameters of museum studies. The museums founded du...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fiona Candlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Leicester 2012-03-01
Series:Museum & Society
Online Access:https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/193
id doaj-8ab471a85f494f1a831b106ceee94cc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ab471a85f494f1a831b106ceee94cc32020-11-24T21:13:25ZengUniversity of LeicesterMuseum & Society1479-83602012-03-011012841182Independent Museums, Heritage, and the Shape of Museum StudiesFiona CandlinReflecting on the British heritage debates of the 1980s and 1990s, Robert Lumley asserted that they continue to influence Anglo-American definitions and perceptions of that subject. This article suggests that they had a correlative impact upon the parameters of museum studies. The museums founded during the 1980s were mainly small scale enterprises and they were devoted to many different topics, but commentators almost exclusively focused on the large independent organisations concerned with the recent industrial past. In doing so they associated the independent sector with ‘heritage’ rather than with established public museums. I maintain that this remains the case. Recent scholarship either considers independent museums in relation to the conceptual framework of the period or in terms of ‘community’, a discourse that is closely linked to recent developments in heritage studies. They are rarely, if ever, mentioned in analyses of architecture, professional practice, contemporary display or the role of museums. This omission effectively ascribes expertise and knowledge to public rather than independent institutions, maintains ingrained structures of social and cultural exclusion, and homogenises museum studies, limiting its concerns and scope.https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/193
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fiona Candlin
spellingShingle Fiona Candlin
Independent Museums, Heritage, and the Shape of Museum Studies
Museum & Society
author_facet Fiona Candlin
author_sort Fiona Candlin
title Independent Museums, Heritage, and the Shape of Museum Studies
title_short Independent Museums, Heritage, and the Shape of Museum Studies
title_full Independent Museums, Heritage, and the Shape of Museum Studies
title_fullStr Independent Museums, Heritage, and the Shape of Museum Studies
title_full_unstemmed Independent Museums, Heritage, and the Shape of Museum Studies
title_sort independent museums, heritage, and the shape of museum studies
publisher University of Leicester
series Museum & Society
issn 1479-8360
publishDate 2012-03-01
description Reflecting on the British heritage debates of the 1980s and 1990s, Robert Lumley asserted that they continue to influence Anglo-American definitions and perceptions of that subject. This article suggests that they had a correlative impact upon the parameters of museum studies. The museums founded during the 1980s were mainly small scale enterprises and they were devoted to many different topics, but commentators almost exclusively focused on the large independent organisations concerned with the recent industrial past. In doing so they associated the independent sector with ‘heritage’ rather than with established public museums. I maintain that this remains the case. Recent scholarship either considers independent museums in relation to the conceptual framework of the period or in terms of ‘community’, a discourse that is closely linked to recent developments in heritage studies. They are rarely, if ever, mentioned in analyses of architecture, professional practice, contemporary display or the role of museums. This omission effectively ascribes expertise and knowledge to public rather than independent institutions, maintains ingrained structures of social and cultural exclusion, and homogenises museum studies, limiting its concerns and scope.
url https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/193
work_keys_str_mv AT fionacandlin independentmuseumsheritageandtheshapeofmuseumstudies
_version_ 1716749226278387712