Comparison of Retinal Thickness Measurements between the Topcon Algorithm and a Graph-Based Algorithm in Normal and Glaucoma Eyes.

• Main Authors: Enting Gao, Binyao Chen, Jianling Yang, Fei Shi, Weifang Zhu, Dehui Xiang, Haoyu Chen, Mingzhi Zhang, Xinjian Chen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
• Series: PLoS ONE
• Online Access: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4456408?pdf=render

To assess the correlation and agreement between the Topcon built-in algorithm and our graph-based algorithm in measuring the total and regional macular thickness for normal and glaucoma subjects.A total of 228 normal eyes and 93 glaucomatous eyes were enrolled in our study. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examination and Topcon 3D-OCT 2000 scan. One eye was randomly selected for each subject. The thickness of each layer and the total and regional macular thickness on an Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart were measured using the Topcon algorithm and our three-dimensional graph-based algorithm. Correlation and agreement analyses between these two algorithms were performed.Our graph search algorithm exhibited a strong correlation with Topcon algorithm. The macular GCC thickness values for normal and glaucoma subjects ranged from 0.86 to 0.91 and from 0.78 to 0.90, and the regional macular thickness values ranged from 0.79 to 0.96 and 0.70 to 0.95, respectively. Small differences were observed between the Topcon algorithm and our graph-based algorithm. The span of 95% limits of agreement of macular GCC thickness was less than 28 μm in both normal and glaucoma subjects, respectively. These limits of total and regional macular thickness were 15.5 μm and 23.1 μm for normal subjects and 29.1 μm and 46.4 μm for glaucoma subjects, respectively.Our graph-based algorithm exhibited a high degree of agreement with the Topcon algorithm with respect to thickness measurements in normal and glaucoma subjects. Moreover, our graph-based algorithm can segment the retina into more layers than the Topcon algorithm does.