Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Few large and rigorous evaluations of participatory interventions systematically describe their context and implementation, or attempt to explain the mechanisms behind their impact. This study reports process evaluation data from the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sinha Rajesh, Bajpai Aparna, Gope Rajkumar, Mahapatra Rajendra, Rath Shibanand, Barnett Sarah, Tripathy Prasanta K, Nair Nirmala, Rath Suchitra, Costello Anthony, Prost Audrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-10-01
Series:BMC International Health and Human Rights
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/10/25
id doaj-8a9e849e079543119832816a5ab2f3a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a9e849e079543119832816a5ab2f3a42021-04-02T16:59:38ZengBMCBMC International Health and Human Rights1472-698X2010-10-011012510.1186/1472-698X-10-25Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluationSinha RajeshBajpai AparnaGope RajkumarMahapatra RajendraRath ShibanandBarnett SarahTripathy Prasanta KNair NirmalaRath SuchitraCostello AnthonyProst Audrey<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Few large and rigorous evaluations of participatory interventions systematically describe their context and implementation, or attempt to explain the mechanisms behind their impact. This study reports process evaluation data from the Ekjut cluster-randomised controlled trial of a participatory learning and action cycle with women's groups to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes in Jharkhand and Orissa, eastern India (2005-2008). The study demonstrated a 45% reduction in neonatal mortality in the last two years of the intervention, largely driven by improvements in safe practices for home deliveries.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A participatory learning and action cycle with 244 women's groups was implemented in 18 intervention clusters covering an estimated population of 114 141. We describe the context, content, and implementation of this intervention, identify potential mechanisms behind its impact, and report challenges experienced in the field. Methods included a review of intervention documents, qualitative structured discussions with group members and non-group members, meeting observations, as well as descriptive statistical analysis of data on meeting attendance, activities, and characteristics of group attendees.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Six broad, interrelated factors influenced the intervention's impact: (1) acceptability; (2) a participatory approach to the development of knowledge, skills and 'critical consciousness'; (3) community involvement beyond the groups; (4) a focus on marginalized communities; (5) the active recruitment of newly pregnant women into groups; (6) high population coverage. We hypothesize that these factors were responsible for the increase in safe delivery and care practices that led to the reduction in neonatal mortality demonstrated in the Ekjut trial.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Participatory interventions with community groups can influence maternal and child health outcomes if key intervention characteristics are preserved and tailored to local contexts. Scaling-up such interventions requires (1) a detailed understanding of the way in which context affects the acceptability and delivery of the intervention; (2) planned but flexible replication of key content and implementation features; (3) strong support for participatory methods from implementing agencies.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/10/25
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sinha Rajesh
Bajpai Aparna
Gope Rajkumar
Mahapatra Rajendra
Rath Shibanand
Barnett Sarah
Tripathy Prasanta K
Nair Nirmala
Rath Suchitra
Costello Anthony
Prost Audrey
spellingShingle Sinha Rajesh
Bajpai Aparna
Gope Rajkumar
Mahapatra Rajendra
Rath Shibanand
Barnett Sarah
Tripathy Prasanta K
Nair Nirmala
Rath Suchitra
Costello Anthony
Prost Audrey
Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation
BMC International Health and Human Rights
author_facet Sinha Rajesh
Bajpai Aparna
Gope Rajkumar
Mahapatra Rajendra
Rath Shibanand
Barnett Sarah
Tripathy Prasanta K
Nair Nirmala
Rath Suchitra
Costello Anthony
Prost Audrey
author_sort Sinha Rajesh
title Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation
title_short Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation
title_full Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation
title_fullStr Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation
title_sort explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the ekjut trial process evaluation
publisher BMC
series BMC International Health and Human Rights
issn 1472-698X
publishDate 2010-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Few large and rigorous evaluations of participatory interventions systematically describe their context and implementation, or attempt to explain the mechanisms behind their impact. This study reports process evaluation data from the Ekjut cluster-randomised controlled trial of a participatory learning and action cycle with women's groups to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes in Jharkhand and Orissa, eastern India (2005-2008). The study demonstrated a 45% reduction in neonatal mortality in the last two years of the intervention, largely driven by improvements in safe practices for home deliveries.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A participatory learning and action cycle with 244 women's groups was implemented in 18 intervention clusters covering an estimated population of 114 141. We describe the context, content, and implementation of this intervention, identify potential mechanisms behind its impact, and report challenges experienced in the field. Methods included a review of intervention documents, qualitative structured discussions with group members and non-group members, meeting observations, as well as descriptive statistical analysis of data on meeting attendance, activities, and characteristics of group attendees.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Six broad, interrelated factors influenced the intervention's impact: (1) acceptability; (2) a participatory approach to the development of knowledge, skills and 'critical consciousness'; (3) community involvement beyond the groups; (4) a focus on marginalized communities; (5) the active recruitment of newly pregnant women into groups; (6) high population coverage. We hypothesize that these factors were responsible for the increase in safe delivery and care practices that led to the reduction in neonatal mortality demonstrated in the Ekjut trial.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Participatory interventions with community groups can influence maternal and child health outcomes if key intervention characteristics are preserved and tailored to local contexts. Scaling-up such interventions requires (1) a detailed understanding of the way in which context affects the acceptability and delivery of the intervention; (2) planned but flexible replication of key content and implementation features; (3) strong support for participatory methods from implementing agencies.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/10/25
work_keys_str_mv AT sinharajesh explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT bajpaiaparna explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT goperajkumar explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT mahapatrarajendra explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT rathshibanand explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT barnettsarah explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT tripathyprasantak explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT nairnirmala explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT rathsuchitra explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT costelloanthony explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
AT prostaudrey explainingtheimpactofawomensgroupledcommunitymobilisationinterventiononmaternalandnewbornhealthoutcomestheekjuttrialprocessevaluation
_version_ 1721554936592859136