Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.

Flow disruption achieved by braided intrasaccular implants is a novel treatment strategy for cerebrovascular aneurysms. We hypothesized that the degree of intra-aneurysmal flow disruption can be quantified in vitro and is influenced by device position across the aneurysm neck. We tested this hypothe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Maximilian Frölich, Marie Teresa Nawka, Marielle Ernst, Isabell Frischmuth, Jens Fiehler, Jan-Hendrik Buhk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5800678?pdf=render
id doaj-8a9a292ccc1d4c81a345b2f69a952b0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a9a292ccc1d4c81a345b2f69a952b0d2020-11-24T21:08:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019197510.1371/journal.pone.0191975Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.Andreas Maximilian FrölichMarie Teresa NawkaMarielle ErnstIsabell FrischmuthJens FiehlerJan-Hendrik BuhkFlow disruption achieved by braided intrasaccular implants is a novel treatment strategy for cerebrovascular aneurysms. We hypothesized that the degree of intra-aneurysmal flow disruption can be quantified in vitro and is influenced by device position across the aneurysm neck. We tested this hypothesis using the Medina® Embolization Device (MED).Ten different patient-specific elastic vascular models were manufactured. Models were connected to a pulsatile flow circuit, filled with a blood-mimicking fluid and treated by two operators using a single MED. Intra-aneurysmal flow velocity was measured using conventional and high-frequency digital subtraction angiography (HF-DSA) before and after each deployment. Aneurysm neck coverage by the implanted devices was assessed with flat detector computed tomography on a three-point Likert scale.A total of 80 individual MED deployments were performed by the two operators. The mean intra-aneurysmal flow velocity reduction after MED implantation was 33.6% (27.5-39.7%). No significant differences in neck coverage (p = 0.99) or flow disruption (p = 0.84) were observed between operators. The degree of flow disruption significantly correlated with neck coverage (ρ = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.59, p = 0.002) as well as with neck area (ρ = -0,35, 95% CI: -0.54 --0.13, p = 0.024). On multiple regression analysis, both neck coverage and total neck area were independent predictors of flow disruption.The degree of intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after MED implantation can be quantified in vitro and varies considerably between different aneurysms and different device configurations. Optimal device coverage across the aneurysm neck improves flow disruption and may thus contribute to aneurysm occlusion.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5800678?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Maximilian Frölich
Marie Teresa Nawka
Marielle Ernst
Isabell Frischmuth
Jens Fiehler
Jan-Hendrik Buhk
spellingShingle Andreas Maximilian Frölich
Marie Teresa Nawka
Marielle Ernst
Isabell Frischmuth
Jens Fiehler
Jan-Hendrik Buhk
Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Andreas Maximilian Frölich
Marie Teresa Nawka
Marielle Ernst
Isabell Frischmuth
Jens Fiehler
Jan-Hendrik Buhk
author_sort Andreas Maximilian Frölich
title Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.
title_short Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.
title_full Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.
title_fullStr Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.
title_full_unstemmed Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.
title_sort intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the medina® embolization device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Flow disruption achieved by braided intrasaccular implants is a novel treatment strategy for cerebrovascular aneurysms. We hypothesized that the degree of intra-aneurysmal flow disruption can be quantified in vitro and is influenced by device position across the aneurysm neck. We tested this hypothesis using the Medina® Embolization Device (MED).Ten different patient-specific elastic vascular models were manufactured. Models were connected to a pulsatile flow circuit, filled with a blood-mimicking fluid and treated by two operators using a single MED. Intra-aneurysmal flow velocity was measured using conventional and high-frequency digital subtraction angiography (HF-DSA) before and after each deployment. Aneurysm neck coverage by the implanted devices was assessed with flat detector computed tomography on a three-point Likert scale.A total of 80 individual MED deployments were performed by the two operators. The mean intra-aneurysmal flow velocity reduction after MED implantation was 33.6% (27.5-39.7%). No significant differences in neck coverage (p = 0.99) or flow disruption (p = 0.84) were observed between operators. The degree of flow disruption significantly correlated with neck coverage (ρ = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.59, p = 0.002) as well as with neck area (ρ = -0,35, 95% CI: -0.54 --0.13, p = 0.024). On multiple regression analysis, both neck coverage and total neck area were independent predictors of flow disruption.The degree of intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after MED implantation can be quantified in vitro and varies considerably between different aneurysms and different device configurations. Optimal device coverage across the aneurysm neck improves flow disruption and may thus contribute to aneurysm occlusion.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5800678?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasmaximilianfrolich intraaneurysmalflowdisruptionafterimplantationofthemedinaembolizationdevicedependsonaneurysmneckcoverage
AT marieteresanawka intraaneurysmalflowdisruptionafterimplantationofthemedinaembolizationdevicedependsonaneurysmneckcoverage
AT marielleernst intraaneurysmalflowdisruptionafterimplantationofthemedinaembolizationdevicedependsonaneurysmneckcoverage
AT isabellfrischmuth intraaneurysmalflowdisruptionafterimplantationofthemedinaembolizationdevicedependsonaneurysmneckcoverage
AT jensfiehler intraaneurysmalflowdisruptionafterimplantationofthemedinaembolizationdevicedependsonaneurysmneckcoverage
AT janhendrikbuhk intraaneurysmalflowdisruptionafterimplantationofthemedinaembolizationdevicedependsonaneurysmneckcoverage
_version_ 1716760436018249728