HASIL UJI EMPIRIK MODEL PENILAIAN AUTENTIK DALAM KOMPETENSI BERBICARA

The reserch has aim to describe the result of empiric test of authentic assessment model in speaking competence. The method used in the research was the Research and Development method, i.e. a research method which used to produce a certain product, and examine the effectivity of the product. The re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laili Rahmawati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan 2015-09-01
Series:Bahastra
Online Access:http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/BAHASTRA/article/view/2720
id doaj-8a96cbc4abea4a94837cc90e2b0e494a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a96cbc4abea4a94837cc90e2b0e494a2021-09-03T15:07:13ZengUniversitas Ahmad DahlanBahastra0215-49942548-45832015-09-0133210.26555/bahastra.v33i2.27201796HASIL UJI EMPIRIK MODEL PENILAIAN AUTENTIK DALAM KOMPETENSI BERBICARALaili Rahmawati0Universitas Muhammadiyah SurakartaThe reserch has aim to describe the result of empiric test of authentic assessment model in speaking competence. The method used in the research was the Research and Development method, i.e. a research method which used to produce a certain product, and examine the effectivity of the product. The research was belonging to the step of model examining. The model examining was conducted by experimenting the authentic assessment model of the speaking competence. The examination were conducted by testing the receiption view of the model developed through the trying out of the apply of assessment model and finding out the properity and its receiption through the statements exploration of the respondents and the expert which act as the lecturer of the speaking competence subject. The respondents or informants statement were acquired by comparing the preview assessment model and the assessment model proposed. Based on the result of the model testing, it can be concluded that by using the assessment rubric, the speaking competence of the students can be known through the various components of the speaking competence in a detail. The difference of the assessment between one jury to other represented that the scores were not too significant different. It means that the perception of the two juries toward the components material were almost equivalent. The condition showed that the objectivity of the assessment was in a high level.http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/BAHASTRA/article/view/2720
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laili Rahmawati
spellingShingle Laili Rahmawati
HASIL UJI EMPIRIK MODEL PENILAIAN AUTENTIK DALAM KOMPETENSI BERBICARA
Bahastra
author_facet Laili Rahmawati
author_sort Laili Rahmawati
title HASIL UJI EMPIRIK MODEL PENILAIAN AUTENTIK DALAM KOMPETENSI BERBICARA
title_short HASIL UJI EMPIRIK MODEL PENILAIAN AUTENTIK DALAM KOMPETENSI BERBICARA
title_full HASIL UJI EMPIRIK MODEL PENILAIAN AUTENTIK DALAM KOMPETENSI BERBICARA
title_fullStr HASIL UJI EMPIRIK MODEL PENILAIAN AUTENTIK DALAM KOMPETENSI BERBICARA
title_full_unstemmed HASIL UJI EMPIRIK MODEL PENILAIAN AUTENTIK DALAM KOMPETENSI BERBICARA
title_sort hasil uji empirik model penilaian autentik dalam kompetensi berbicara
publisher Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
series Bahastra
issn 0215-4994
2548-4583
publishDate 2015-09-01
description The reserch has aim to describe the result of empiric test of authentic assessment model in speaking competence. The method used in the research was the Research and Development method, i.e. a research method which used to produce a certain product, and examine the effectivity of the product. The research was belonging to the step of model examining. The model examining was conducted by experimenting the authentic assessment model of the speaking competence. The examination were conducted by testing the receiption view of the model developed through the trying out of the apply of assessment model and finding out the properity and its receiption through the statements exploration of the respondents and the expert which act as the lecturer of the speaking competence subject. The respondents or informants statement were acquired by comparing the preview assessment model and the assessment model proposed. Based on the result of the model testing, it can be concluded that by using the assessment rubric, the speaking competence of the students can be known through the various components of the speaking competence in a detail. The difference of the assessment between one jury to other represented that the scores were not too significant different. It means that the perception of the two juries toward the components material were almost equivalent. The condition showed that the objectivity of the assessment was in a high level.
url http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/BAHASTRA/article/view/2720
work_keys_str_mv AT lailirahmawati hasilujiempirikmodelpenilaianautentikdalamkompetensiberbicara
_version_ 1717816265206136832