"Effect of Different Saliva Decontamination Procedures on Bond Strength to Dentin in Single Bottle Systems "

Statement of Problem: Following the increasing use of composites in restoring anterior and posterior teeth, problems due to its technique sensitivity have become a major concern. One of these problems is the possibility of contamination of dentin with saliva, blood and/or gingival fluid in different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Ghavam, Sh. Khalaf Pour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2004-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/22
id doaj-8a965a5d781345339f7c8434d9363467
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a965a5d781345339f7c8434d93634672020-11-25T03:27:53ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesFrontiers in Dentistry2676-296X2004-09-0113"Effect of Different Saliva Decontamination Procedures on Bond Strength to Dentin in Single Bottle Systems " M. Ghavam0 Sh. Khalaf Pour1 Statement of Problem: Following the increasing use of composites in restoring anterior and posterior teeth, problems due to its technique sensitivity have become a major concern. One of these problems is the possibility of contamination of dentin with saliva, blood and/or gingival fluid in different stages of bonding procedure, even with application of different methods of isolation. However, by introduction of Single-bottle dentin adhesives, the contamination possibility reduced to two stages. Scientific documents show that saliva contamination reduces bond strength of composites to dentin. Application of simple and efficient methods for reducing or eliminating saliva contamination enables clinicians to carry out dental treatment without any concern about deterioration of clinical longevity of restoration. Purpose: This study was designed to compare the effect of different decontamination methods on the shear bond strength of composite to dentin using a “Single-bottle” adhesive. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two extracted sound human molars and premolars were selected. Enamel of buccal surface was ground flat to expose dentin. The teeth were divided into 9 groups of 8 each. In control group (1) the adhesive “Excite” was used according to the manufacturer, without any contamination. Conditioned and saliva contaminated dentin was (2) rinsed and blot dried, (3) rinsed, dried and re-etched. In groups 4, 5, 6 uncured adhesive was saliva contaminated and then: (4) only blot dried (5) rinsed, blot dried with adhesive reapplication and (6) resurfaced with bur, rinsed, dried and followed by repeating the whole process. In groups 7, 8, 9 cured adhesive was contaminated with saliva and then: (7) rinsed and dried (8) rinsed, blot dried with adhesive reapplication (9) same as group (6). Then “Tetric Ceram” composite cylinders were bonded to dentin surfaces. Samples were thermo cycled in 5°C and 55°C water, 30 seconds in each bath with a dowel time of 10 seconds for 500 cycles. Finally, samples were sheared using Instron testing machine and shear bond strength data were subjected to one way ANOVA analysis, and Tukey HSD PostHoc. Mode of failure of samples was examined under Stereomicroscope (×40) and using Log-rank survival data analysis. Results: No statistically difference between mean shear bond strength of groups 1,2,3 was observed (P=0.543). Comparison of groups 4,5,6 with group 1 showed that shear bond strength of group 4 was significantly lower (Phttps://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/22Saliva contaminationDentin bonding agentsSingle-bottle dentin bonding systemShear bond strength
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Ghavam
Sh. Khalaf Pour
spellingShingle M. Ghavam
Sh. Khalaf Pour
"Effect of Different Saliva Decontamination Procedures on Bond Strength to Dentin in Single Bottle Systems "
Frontiers in Dentistry
Saliva contamination
Dentin bonding agents
Single-bottle dentin bonding system
Shear bond strength
author_facet M. Ghavam
Sh. Khalaf Pour
author_sort M. Ghavam
title "Effect of Different Saliva Decontamination Procedures on Bond Strength to Dentin in Single Bottle Systems "
title_short "Effect of Different Saliva Decontamination Procedures on Bond Strength to Dentin in Single Bottle Systems "
title_full "Effect of Different Saliva Decontamination Procedures on Bond Strength to Dentin in Single Bottle Systems "
title_fullStr "Effect of Different Saliva Decontamination Procedures on Bond Strength to Dentin in Single Bottle Systems "
title_full_unstemmed "Effect of Different Saliva Decontamination Procedures on Bond Strength to Dentin in Single Bottle Systems "
title_sort "effect of different saliva decontamination procedures on bond strength to dentin in single bottle systems "
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Frontiers in Dentistry
issn 2676-296X
publishDate 2004-09-01
description Statement of Problem: Following the increasing use of composites in restoring anterior and posterior teeth, problems due to its technique sensitivity have become a major concern. One of these problems is the possibility of contamination of dentin with saliva, blood and/or gingival fluid in different stages of bonding procedure, even with application of different methods of isolation. However, by introduction of Single-bottle dentin adhesives, the contamination possibility reduced to two stages. Scientific documents show that saliva contamination reduces bond strength of composites to dentin. Application of simple and efficient methods for reducing or eliminating saliva contamination enables clinicians to carry out dental treatment without any concern about deterioration of clinical longevity of restoration. Purpose: This study was designed to compare the effect of different decontamination methods on the shear bond strength of composite to dentin using a “Single-bottle” adhesive. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two extracted sound human molars and premolars were selected. Enamel of buccal surface was ground flat to expose dentin. The teeth were divided into 9 groups of 8 each. In control group (1) the adhesive “Excite” was used according to the manufacturer, without any contamination. Conditioned and saliva contaminated dentin was (2) rinsed and blot dried, (3) rinsed, dried and re-etched. In groups 4, 5, 6 uncured adhesive was saliva contaminated and then: (4) only blot dried (5) rinsed, blot dried with adhesive reapplication and (6) resurfaced with bur, rinsed, dried and followed by repeating the whole process. In groups 7, 8, 9 cured adhesive was contaminated with saliva and then: (7) rinsed and dried (8) rinsed, blot dried with adhesive reapplication (9) same as group (6). Then “Tetric Ceram” composite cylinders were bonded to dentin surfaces. Samples were thermo cycled in 5°C and 55°C water, 30 seconds in each bath with a dowel time of 10 seconds for 500 cycles. Finally, samples were sheared using Instron testing machine and shear bond strength data were subjected to one way ANOVA analysis, and Tukey HSD PostHoc. Mode of failure of samples was examined under Stereomicroscope (×40) and using Log-rank survival data analysis. Results: No statistically difference between mean shear bond strength of groups 1,2,3 was observed (P=0.543). Comparison of groups 4,5,6 with group 1 showed that shear bond strength of group 4 was significantly lower (P
topic Saliva contamination
Dentin bonding agents
Single-bottle dentin bonding system
Shear bond strength
url https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/22
work_keys_str_mv AT mghavam effectofdifferentsalivadecontaminationproceduresonbondstrengthtodentininsinglebottlesystems
AT shkhalafpour effectofdifferentsalivadecontaminationproceduresonbondstrengthtodentininsinglebottlesystems
_version_ 1724586569570975744