A comparison of plume rise algorithms to stack plume measurements in the Athabasca oil sands

• Main Authors: M. Gordon, P. A. Makar, R. M. Staebler, J. Zhang, A. Akingunola, W. Gong, S.-M. Li
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-10-01
• Series: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
• Online Access: https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/14695/2018/acp-18-14695-2018.pdf

<p>Plume rise parameterizations calculate the rise of pollutant plumes due to effluent buoyancy and exit momentum. Some form of these parameterizations is used by most air quality models. In this paper, the performance of the commonly used Briggs plume rise algorithm was extensively evaluated, through a comparison of the algorithm's results when driven by meteorological observations with direct observations of plume heights in the Athabasca oil sands region. The observations were carried out as part of the Canada-Alberta Joint Oil Sands Monitoring Plan in August and September of 2013. Wind and temperature data used to drive the algorithm were measured in the region of emissions from various platforms, including two meteorological towers, a radio-acoustic profiler, and a research aircraft. Other meteorological variables used to drive the algorithm include friction velocity, boundary-layer height, and the Obukhov length. Stack emissions and flow parameter information reported by continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMSs) were used to drive the plume rise algorithm. The calculated plume heights were then compared to interpolated aircraft SO₂ measurements, in order to evaluate the algorithm's prediction for plume rise. We demonstrate that the Briggs algorithm, when driven by ambient observations, significantly underestimated plume rise for these sources, with more than 50&thinsp;% of the predicted plume heights falling below half the observed values from this analysis. With the inclusion of the effects of effluent momentum, the choice of different forms of parameterizations, and the use of different stability classification systems, this essential finding remains unchanged. In all cases, approximately 50&thinsp;% or more of the predicted plume heights fall below half the observed values. These results are in contrast to numerous plume rise measurement studies published between 1968 and 1993. We note that the observations used to drive the algorithms imply the potential presence of significant spatial heterogeneity in meteorological conditions; we examine the potential impact of this heterogeneity in our companion paper (Akingunola et al., 2018). It is suggested that further study using long-term in situ measurements with currently available technologies is warranted to investigate this discrepancy, and that wherever possible, meteorological input variables are observed in the immediate vicinity of the emitting stacks.</p>