Safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Background: Transvenous lead extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) has been proven safe in the general patient population with the advances in extraction techniques. Octogenarians present a unique challenge given their comorbidities and the perceived increase in morbidity...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Heart Rhythm O2 |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501820301094 |
id |
doaj-8a8925f96c274a249b181706c3487c8e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8a8925f96c274a249b181706c3487c8e2021-09-03T04:47:21ZengElsevierHeart Rhythm O22666-50182020-10-0114250258Safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: A meta-analysis and systematic reviewAndrew Y. Lin, MD0Florentino Lupercio, MD1Gordon Ho, MD, FHRS2Travis Pollema, DO3Victor Pretorius, MBchB4Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, MD, FHRS5Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Address reprint requests and correspondence: Dr Andrew Lin, Division of Cardiology, University of California–San Diego, 9452 Medical Center Dr, MC7411, Altman Building Room 3E-313, La Jolla, CA 92037.Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CaliforniaDivision of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CaliforniaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CaliforniaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CaliforniaDivision of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CaliforniaBackground: Transvenous lead extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) has been proven safe in the general patient population with the advances in extraction techniques. Octogenarians present a unique challenge given their comorbidities and the perceived increase in morbidity and mortality. Objective: To assess the safety and outcomes of CIED extraction in octogenarians to younger patients. Methods: We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared CIED extraction in octogenarians versus non-octogenarians. We separately assessed the rate of complete procedure success, clinical success, procedural mortality, major and minor complications. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The random effects model was used due to heterogeneity across study cohorts. Results: Seven studies with a total of 4,182 patients were included. There was no difference between octogenarians and non-octogenarians in complete procedure success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 – 1.02, p = 0.19) and clinical success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 – 1.01, p = 0.13). There was also no difference in procedural mortality (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.46 – 4.39, p = 0.54), major complication (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.68 – 2.88, p = 0.36), and minor complication (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.90 – 2.29, p = 0.13). Conclusion: In this study, there was no evidence to suggest a difference in procedural success and complication rates between octogenarians and younger patients. Transvenous lead extraction can be performed safely and effectively in the elderly population.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501820301094Cardiovascular implantable electronic deviceImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorOctogenarianPacemakerTransvenous lead extraction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrew Y. Lin, MD Florentino Lupercio, MD Gordon Ho, MD, FHRS Travis Pollema, DO Victor Pretorius, MBchB Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, MD, FHRS |
spellingShingle |
Andrew Y. Lin, MD Florentino Lupercio, MD Gordon Ho, MD, FHRS Travis Pollema, DO Victor Pretorius, MBchB Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, MD, FHRS Safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiovascular implantable electronic device Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Octogenarian Pacemaker Transvenous lead extraction |
author_facet |
Andrew Y. Lin, MD Florentino Lupercio, MD Gordon Ho, MD, FHRS Travis Pollema, DO Victor Pretorius, MBchB Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, MD, FHRS |
author_sort |
Andrew Y. Lin, MD |
title |
Safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_short |
Safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_full |
Safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_sort |
safety and efficacy of cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Heart Rhythm O2 |
issn |
2666-5018 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Background: Transvenous lead extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) has been proven safe in the general patient population with the advances in extraction techniques. Octogenarians present a unique challenge given their comorbidities and the perceived increase in morbidity and mortality. Objective: To assess the safety and outcomes of CIED extraction in octogenarians to younger patients. Methods: We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared CIED extraction in octogenarians versus non-octogenarians. We separately assessed the rate of complete procedure success, clinical success, procedural mortality, major and minor complications. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The random effects model was used due to heterogeneity across study cohorts. Results: Seven studies with a total of 4,182 patients were included. There was no difference between octogenarians and non-octogenarians in complete procedure success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 – 1.02, p = 0.19) and clinical success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 – 1.01, p = 0.13). There was also no difference in procedural mortality (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.46 – 4.39, p = 0.54), major complication (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.68 – 2.88, p = 0.36), and minor complication (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.90 – 2.29, p = 0.13). Conclusion: In this study, there was no evidence to suggest a difference in procedural success and complication rates between octogenarians and younger patients. Transvenous lead extraction can be performed safely and effectively in the elderly population. |
topic |
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Octogenarian Pacemaker Transvenous lead extraction |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501820301094 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrewylinmd safetyandefficacyofcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceextractioninelderlypatientsametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT florentinoluperciomd safetyandefficacyofcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceextractioninelderlypatientsametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT gordonhomdfhrs safetyandefficacyofcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceextractioninelderlypatientsametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT travispollemado safetyandefficacyofcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceextractioninelderlypatientsametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT victorpretoriusmbchb safetyandefficacyofcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceextractioninelderlypatientsametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT ulrikabirgersdottergreenmdfhrs safetyandefficacyofcardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceextractioninelderlypatientsametaanalysisandsystematicreview |
_version_ |
1717817856700186624 |