Prosecution of Wartime Environmental Damage by Non-State Parties at the International Criminal Court

This article presents a novel way of prosecuting wartime environmental damage committed by non-state parties to the Rome Statute at the International Criminal Court. The current legal framework applicable during armed conflicts has many gaps and weaknesses, leaving the environment as a silent victim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jessica Schaffer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University 2020-11-01
Series:Bond Law Review
Online Access:http://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/17931-prosecution-of-wartime-environmental-damage-by-non-state-parties-at-the-international-criminal-court.pdf
id doaj-8a6e2a82c358412b9143eeb3b346c82d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a6e2a82c358412b9143eeb3b346c82d2020-11-25T04:06:54ZengBond UniversityBond Law Review2202-48242020-11-01Prosecution of Wartime Environmental Damage by Non-State Parties at the International Criminal CourtJessica SchafferThis article presents a novel way of prosecuting wartime environmental damage committed by non-state parties to the Rome Statute at the International Criminal Court. The current legal framework applicable during armed conflicts has many gaps and weaknesses, leaving the environment as a silent victim. The stringent threshold that must be met before environmental damage is prohibited under international humanitarian law has failed to offer any real protection, particularly in non-international armed conflicts, despite their growing prevalence. Furthermore, destruction of the environment has not materialised as a distinct crime in international law; rather, it is treated as a material element or underlying act of other crimes in the Rome Statute. Where states involved in armed conflicts are not party to the Rome Statute, individuals can seemingly enjoy impunity for serious environmental harm arising during the conflict. This article will illustrate how individuals from non-state parties could face criminal responsibility for environmental crimes where one element of the crime, namely environmental damage, is committed on the territory of a state party. This offers a novel, albeit limited route for addressing the gaps in the current law.http://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/17931-prosecution-of-wartime-environmental-damage-by-non-state-parties-at-the-international-criminal-court.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jessica Schaffer
spellingShingle Jessica Schaffer
Prosecution of Wartime Environmental Damage by Non-State Parties at the International Criminal Court
Bond Law Review
author_facet Jessica Schaffer
author_sort Jessica Schaffer
title Prosecution of Wartime Environmental Damage by Non-State Parties at the International Criminal Court
title_short Prosecution of Wartime Environmental Damage by Non-State Parties at the International Criminal Court
title_full Prosecution of Wartime Environmental Damage by Non-State Parties at the International Criminal Court
title_fullStr Prosecution of Wartime Environmental Damage by Non-State Parties at the International Criminal Court
title_full_unstemmed Prosecution of Wartime Environmental Damage by Non-State Parties at the International Criminal Court
title_sort prosecution of wartime environmental damage by non-state parties at the international criminal court
publisher Bond University
series Bond Law Review
issn 2202-4824
publishDate 2020-11-01
description This article presents a novel way of prosecuting wartime environmental damage committed by non-state parties to the Rome Statute at the International Criminal Court. The current legal framework applicable during armed conflicts has many gaps and weaknesses, leaving the environment as a silent victim. The stringent threshold that must be met before environmental damage is prohibited under international humanitarian law has failed to offer any real protection, particularly in non-international armed conflicts, despite their growing prevalence. Furthermore, destruction of the environment has not materialised as a distinct crime in international law; rather, it is treated as a material element or underlying act of other crimes in the Rome Statute. Where states involved in armed conflicts are not party to the Rome Statute, individuals can seemingly enjoy impunity for serious environmental harm arising during the conflict. This article will illustrate how individuals from non-state parties could face criminal responsibility for environmental crimes where one element of the crime, namely environmental damage, is committed on the territory of a state party. This offers a novel, albeit limited route for addressing the gaps in the current law.
url http://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/17931-prosecution-of-wartime-environmental-damage-by-non-state-parties-at-the-international-criminal-court.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicaschaffer prosecutionofwartimeenvironmentaldamagebynonstatepartiesattheinternationalcriminalcourt
_version_ 1724430292555399168