Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.

We studied the dynamics of lexical decisions by asking participants to categorize lexical and nonlexical stimuli and recording their mouse movements toward response buttons during the choice. In a previous report we revealed greater trajectory curvature and attraction to competitors for Low Frequenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Barca, Giovanni Pezzulo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116193
id doaj-8a5eb0db943a43e1a0e179d2a5b99e39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a5eb0db943a43e1a0e179d2a5b99e392021-03-03T20:10:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01102e011619310.1371/journal.pone.0116193Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.Laura BarcaGiovanni PezzuloWe studied the dynamics of lexical decisions by asking participants to categorize lexical and nonlexical stimuli and recording their mouse movements toward response buttons during the choice. In a previous report we revealed greater trajectory curvature and attraction to competitors for Low Frequency words and Pseudowords. This analysis did not clarify whether the trajectory curvature in the two conditions was due to a continuous dynamic competition between the response alternatives or if a discrete revision process (a "change of mind") took place during the choice from an initially selected response to the opposite one. To disentangle these two possibilities, here we analyse the velocity and acceleration profiles of mouse movements during the choice. Pseudowords' peak movement velocity occurred with 100 ms delay with respect to words and Letters Strings. Acceleration profile for High and Low Frequency words and Letters Strings exhibited a butterfly plot with one acceleration peak at 400 ms and one deceleration peak at 650 ms. Differently, Pseudowords' acceleration profile had double positive peaks (at 400 and 600 ms) followed by movement deceleration, in correspondence with changes in the decision from lexical to nonlexical response buttons. These results speak to different online processes during the categorization of Low Frequency words and Pseudowords, with a continuous competition process for the former and a discrete revision process for the latter.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116193
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Barca
Giovanni Pezzulo
spellingShingle Laura Barca
Giovanni Pezzulo
Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Laura Barca
Giovanni Pezzulo
author_sort Laura Barca
title Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.
title_short Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.
title_full Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.
title_fullStr Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.
title_full_unstemmed Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.
title_sort tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description We studied the dynamics of lexical decisions by asking participants to categorize lexical and nonlexical stimuli and recording their mouse movements toward response buttons during the choice. In a previous report we revealed greater trajectory curvature and attraction to competitors for Low Frequency words and Pseudowords. This analysis did not clarify whether the trajectory curvature in the two conditions was due to a continuous dynamic competition between the response alternatives or if a discrete revision process (a "change of mind") took place during the choice from an initially selected response to the opposite one. To disentangle these two possibilities, here we analyse the velocity and acceleration profiles of mouse movements during the choice. Pseudowords' peak movement velocity occurred with 100 ms delay with respect to words and Letters Strings. Acceleration profile for High and Low Frequency words and Letters Strings exhibited a butterfly plot with one acceleration peak at 400 ms and one deceleration peak at 650 ms. Differently, Pseudowords' acceleration profile had double positive peaks (at 400 and 600 ms) followed by movement deceleration, in correspondence with changes in the decision from lexical to nonlexical response buttons. These results speak to different online processes during the categorization of Low Frequency words and Pseudowords, with a continuous competition process for the former and a discrete revision process for the latter.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116193
work_keys_str_mv AT laurabarca trackingsecondthoughtscontinuousanddiscreterevisionprocessesduringvisuallexicaldecision
AT giovannipezzulo trackingsecondthoughtscontinuousanddiscreterevisionprocessesduringvisuallexicaldecision
_version_ 1714823736466604032