Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradox

The feminist movement purports to improve conditions for women, and yet only a minority of women in modern societies self-identify as feminists. This is known as the feminist paradox. It has been suggested that feminists exhibit both physiological and psychological characteristics associated with he...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guy eMadison, Ulrika eAasa, John eWallert, Michael eWoodley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/full
id doaj-8a5e2e19babf4923ac8b328df141daed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a5e2e19babf4923ac8b328df141daed2020-11-25T01:05:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-09-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011105820Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradoxGuy eMadison0Ulrika eAasa1John eWallert2Michael eWoodley3Umeå UniversityUmeå UniversityUmeå UniversityUmeå UniversityThe feminist movement purports to improve conditions for women, and yet only a minority of women in modern societies self-identify as feminists. This is known as the feminist paradox. It has been suggested that feminists exhibit both physiological and psychological characteristics associated with heightened masculinization, which may predispose women for heightened competitiveness, sex-atypical behaviors, and belief in the interchangeability of sex roles. If feminist activists, i.e. those that manufacture the public image of feminism, are indeed masculinized relative to women in general, this might explain why the views and preferences of these two groups are at variance with each other. We measured the 2D:4D digit ratios (collected from both hands) and a personality trait known as dominance (measured with the Directiveness scale) in a sample of women attending a feminist conference. The sample exhibited significantly more masculine 2D:4D and higher dominance ratings than comparison samples representative of women in general, and these variables were furthermore positively correlated for both hands. The feminist paradox might thus to some extent be explained by biological differences between women in general and the activist women who formulate the feminist agenda.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/fullFeminismPersonalityTestosteronedigit ratioevolutionary psychologybeliefs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guy eMadison
Ulrika eAasa
John eWallert
Michael eWoodley
spellingShingle Guy eMadison
Ulrika eAasa
John eWallert
Michael eWoodley
Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradox
Frontiers in Psychology
Feminism
Personality
Testosterone
digit ratio
evolutionary psychology
beliefs
author_facet Guy eMadison
Ulrika eAasa
John eWallert
Michael eWoodley
author_sort Guy eMadison
title Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradox
title_short Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradox
title_full Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradox
title_fullStr Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradox
title_full_unstemmed Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradox
title_sort feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: a possible explanation for the feminist paradox
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-09-01
description The feminist movement purports to improve conditions for women, and yet only a minority of women in modern societies self-identify as feminists. This is known as the feminist paradox. It has been suggested that feminists exhibit both physiological and psychological characteristics associated with heightened masculinization, which may predispose women for heightened competitiveness, sex-atypical behaviors, and belief in the interchangeability of sex roles. If feminist activists, i.e. those that manufacture the public image of feminism, are indeed masculinized relative to women in general, this might explain why the views and preferences of these two groups are at variance with each other. We measured the 2D:4D digit ratios (collected from both hands) and a personality trait known as dominance (measured with the Directiveness scale) in a sample of women attending a feminist conference. The sample exhibited significantly more masculine 2D:4D and higher dominance ratings than comparison samples representative of women in general, and these variables were furthermore positively correlated for both hands. The feminist paradox might thus to some extent be explained by biological differences between women in general and the activist women who formulate the feminist agenda.
topic Feminism
Personality
Testosterone
digit ratio
evolutionary psychology
beliefs
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/full
work_keys_str_mv AT guyemadison feministactivistwomenaremasculinizedintermsofdigitratioanddominanceapossibleexplanationforthefeministparadox
AT ulrikaeaasa feministactivistwomenaremasculinizedintermsofdigitratioanddominanceapossibleexplanationforthefeministparadox
AT johnewallert feministactivistwomenaremasculinizedintermsofdigitratioanddominanceapossibleexplanationforthefeministparadox
AT michaelewoodley feministactivistwomenaremasculinizedintermsofdigitratioanddominanceapossibleexplanationforthefeministparadox
_version_ 1725194649029574656