Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changes

Despite their frequent appearance, intra-abdominal adhesions are rarely the subject of clinical studies and academic discussions. For many years the operators have been trying to reduce such unfavourable consequences of interventions in the abdominal structures. The aim of this article is to pres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrzej Smereczyński, Teresa Starzyńska, Katarzyna Kołaczyk, Stefania Bojko, Maria Gałdyńska, Elżbieta Bernatowicz, Anna Walecka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. 2013-03-01
Series:Journal of Ultrasonography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-13-no-52/intra-abdominal-adhesions-in-ultrasound-part-ii-the-morphology-of-changes?aid=121
id doaj-8a59cfde023a4a90ae20b35d5423652b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a59cfde023a4a90ae20b35d5423652b2020-11-25T02:23:55ZengMedical Communications Sp. z o.o.Journal of Ultrasonography2084-84042451-070X2013-03-01135293103Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changesAndrzej Smereczyński0Teresa Starzyńska1Katarzyna Kołaczyk2Stefania Bojko3Maria Gałdyńska4Elżbieta Bernatowicz5Anna Walecka6Klinika Gastroenterologii, Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Szczecin, PolskaKlinika Gastroenterologii, Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Szczecin, PolskaZakład Diagnostyki Obrazowej i Radiologii Interwencyjnej, Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Szczecin, PolskaOddział Wewnętrzny Szpitala MSWiA w Szczecinie, Szczecin, Polska Oddział Wewnętrzny Szpitala MSWiA w Szczecinie, Szczecin, Polska Oddział Wewnętrzny Szpitala MSWiA w Szczecinie, Szczecin, Polska Zakład Diagnostyki Obrazowej i Radiologii Interwencyjnej, Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Szczecin, PolskaDespite their frequent appearance, intra-abdominal adhesions are rarely the subject of clinical studies and academic discussions. For many years the operators have been trying to reduce such unfavourable consequences of interventions in the abdominal structures. The aim of this article is to present the possibilities of intra-abdominal adhesion diagnostics by means of ultrasound imaging based on authors’ own experience and information included in pertinent literature. The anatomy and examination technique of the abdominal wall were discussed in Part I of the article. In order to evaluate intraperitoneal adhesions, one should use a convex transducer with the frequency of 3.5–6 MHz. The article provides numerous examples of US images presenting intra-abdominal adhesions, particularly those which appeared after surgical procedures. The significance of determining their localisation and extensiveness prior to a planned surgical treatment is emphasized. Four types of morphological changes in the ultrasound caused by intra-abdominal adhesions are distinguished and described: visceroperitoneal adhesions, intraperitoneal adhesions, adhesive obstructions as well as adhesions between the liver and abdominal wall with a special form of such changes, i.e. hepatic pseudotumour. Its ultrasound features are as follows: 1. The lesion is localised below the scar in the abdominal wall after their incision. 2. The lesion is localised in the abdominal part of the liver segments III, IV and V. 3. With the US beam focus precisely set, the lack of fascia – peritoneum complex may be noticed. An uneven liver outline or its ventral displacement appears. 4. A hepatic adhesion-related pseudotumour usually has indistinct margins, especially the posterior one, and, gradually, from top to bottom, loses its hypoechogenic nature. 5. In a respiration test, this liver fragment does not present the sliding movement – a neoplastic tumour rarely shows such an effect. The immobility of the liver is a permanent symptom of subdiaphragmatic abscess which needs to be included in the differentiation process. 6. In case of doubts, the suspicious liver area may be examined without the consideration of the scar in the abdominal wall. In the differentiation of visceroperitoneal adhesions, firstly, one needs to exclude the peritoneum infiltration in the course of inflammation and neoplastic spreading, which may be very difficult in patients who have undergone a surgery. Pseudomyxoma peritonei constitutes a source of errors much more rarely.http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-13-no-52/intra-abdominal-adhesions-in-ultrasound-part-ii-the-morphology-of-changes?aid=121visceroperitoneal adhesionsintraperitoneal adhesionsintestinal obstructionhepatic pseudotumourultrasound
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrzej Smereczyński
Teresa Starzyńska
Katarzyna Kołaczyk
Stefania Bojko
Maria Gałdyńska
Elżbieta Bernatowicz
Anna Walecka
spellingShingle Andrzej Smereczyński
Teresa Starzyńska
Katarzyna Kołaczyk
Stefania Bojko
Maria Gałdyńska
Elżbieta Bernatowicz
Anna Walecka
Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changes
Journal of Ultrasonography
visceroperitoneal adhesions
intraperitoneal adhesions
intestinal obstruction
hepatic pseudotumour
ultrasound
author_facet Andrzej Smereczyński
Teresa Starzyńska
Katarzyna Kołaczyk
Stefania Bojko
Maria Gałdyńska
Elżbieta Bernatowicz
Anna Walecka
author_sort Andrzej Smereczyński
title Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changes
title_short Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changes
title_full Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changes
title_fullStr Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changes
title_full_unstemmed Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changes
title_sort intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. part ii: the morphology of changes
publisher Medical Communications Sp. z o.o.
series Journal of Ultrasonography
issn 2084-8404
2451-070X
publishDate 2013-03-01
description Despite their frequent appearance, intra-abdominal adhesions are rarely the subject of clinical studies and academic discussions. For many years the operators have been trying to reduce such unfavourable consequences of interventions in the abdominal structures. The aim of this article is to present the possibilities of intra-abdominal adhesion diagnostics by means of ultrasound imaging based on authors’ own experience and information included in pertinent literature. The anatomy and examination technique of the abdominal wall were discussed in Part I of the article. In order to evaluate intraperitoneal adhesions, one should use a convex transducer with the frequency of 3.5–6 MHz. The article provides numerous examples of US images presenting intra-abdominal adhesions, particularly those which appeared after surgical procedures. The significance of determining their localisation and extensiveness prior to a planned surgical treatment is emphasized. Four types of morphological changes in the ultrasound caused by intra-abdominal adhesions are distinguished and described: visceroperitoneal adhesions, intraperitoneal adhesions, adhesive obstructions as well as adhesions between the liver and abdominal wall with a special form of such changes, i.e. hepatic pseudotumour. Its ultrasound features are as follows: 1. The lesion is localised below the scar in the abdominal wall after their incision. 2. The lesion is localised in the abdominal part of the liver segments III, IV and V. 3. With the US beam focus precisely set, the lack of fascia – peritoneum complex may be noticed. An uneven liver outline or its ventral displacement appears. 4. A hepatic adhesion-related pseudotumour usually has indistinct margins, especially the posterior one, and, gradually, from top to bottom, loses its hypoechogenic nature. 5. In a respiration test, this liver fragment does not present the sliding movement – a neoplastic tumour rarely shows such an effect. The immobility of the liver is a permanent symptom of subdiaphragmatic abscess which needs to be included in the differentiation process. 6. In case of doubts, the suspicious liver area may be examined without the consideration of the scar in the abdominal wall. In the differentiation of visceroperitoneal adhesions, firstly, one needs to exclude the peritoneum infiltration in the course of inflammation and neoplastic spreading, which may be very difficult in patients who have undergone a surgery. Pseudomyxoma peritonei constitutes a source of errors much more rarely.
topic visceroperitoneal adhesions
intraperitoneal adhesions
intestinal obstruction
hepatic pseudotumour
ultrasound
url http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-13-no-52/intra-abdominal-adhesions-in-ultrasound-part-ii-the-morphology-of-changes?aid=121
work_keys_str_mv AT andrzejsmereczynski intraabdominaladhesionsinultrasoundpartiithemorphologyofchanges
AT teresastarzynska intraabdominaladhesionsinultrasoundpartiithemorphologyofchanges
AT katarzynakołaczyk intraabdominaladhesionsinultrasoundpartiithemorphologyofchanges
AT stefaniabojko intraabdominaladhesionsinultrasoundpartiithemorphologyofchanges
AT mariagałdynska intraabdominaladhesionsinultrasoundpartiithemorphologyofchanges
AT elzbietabernatowicz intraabdominaladhesionsinultrasoundpartiithemorphologyofchanges
AT annawalecka intraabdominaladhesionsinultrasoundpartiithemorphologyofchanges
_version_ 1724856364414533632