A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control

Abstract Background Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a hidden form of violence against women. It includes behaviours intended to control or dictate a woman’s reproductive autonomy, for the purpose of either preventing or promoting pregnancy. Main text In this commentary, we argue that there...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Tarzia, Kelsey Hegarty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-04-01
Series:Reproductive Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6
id doaj-8a57d959294f4daba38da548041434d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a57d959294f4daba38da548041434d62021-05-02T11:18:27ZengBMCReproductive Health1742-47552021-04-0118111010.1186/s12978-021-01143-6A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and controlLaura Tarzia0Kelsey Hegarty1Department of General Practice, The University of MelbourneDepartment of General Practice, The University of MelbourneAbstract Background Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a hidden form of violence against women. It includes behaviours intended to control or dictate a woman’s reproductive autonomy, for the purpose of either preventing or promoting pregnancy. Main text In this commentary, we argue that there is a lack of conceptual clarity around RCA that is a barrier to developing a robust evidence base. Furthermore, we suggest that there is a poor understanding of the way that RCA intersects with other types of violence (intimate partner violence; sexual violence) and—as a result—inconsistent definition and measurement in research and healthcare practice. To address this, we propose a new way of understanding RCA that centres perpetrator intent and the presence of fear and/or control. Recommendations for future research are also discussed. Conclusion We suggest that IPV and SV are the mechanisms through which RCA is perpetrated. In other words, RCA cannot exist without some other form of co-occurring violence in a relationship. This has important implications for research, policy and healthcare practice including for screening and identification of women in reproductive healthcare settings.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6Reproductive coercionIntimate partner violenceSexual violenceReproductive autonomyWomenFamily violence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Tarzia
Kelsey Hegarty
spellingShingle Laura Tarzia
Kelsey Hegarty
A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control
Reproductive Health
Reproductive coercion
Intimate partner violence
Sexual violence
Reproductive autonomy
Women
Family violence
author_facet Laura Tarzia
Kelsey Hegarty
author_sort Laura Tarzia
title A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control
title_short A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control
title_full A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control
title_fullStr A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control
title_full_unstemmed A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control
title_sort conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control
publisher BMC
series Reproductive Health
issn 1742-4755
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Background Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a hidden form of violence against women. It includes behaviours intended to control or dictate a woman’s reproductive autonomy, for the purpose of either preventing or promoting pregnancy. Main text In this commentary, we argue that there is a lack of conceptual clarity around RCA that is a barrier to developing a robust evidence base. Furthermore, we suggest that there is a poor understanding of the way that RCA intersects with other types of violence (intimate partner violence; sexual violence) and—as a result—inconsistent definition and measurement in research and healthcare practice. To address this, we propose a new way of understanding RCA that centres perpetrator intent and the presence of fear and/or control. Recommendations for future research are also discussed. Conclusion We suggest that IPV and SV are the mechanisms through which RCA is perpetrated. In other words, RCA cannot exist without some other form of co-occurring violence in a relationship. This has important implications for research, policy and healthcare practice including for screening and identification of women in reproductive healthcare settings.
topic Reproductive coercion
Intimate partner violence
Sexual violence
Reproductive autonomy
Women
Family violence
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lauratarzia aconceptualreevaluationofreproductivecoercioncentringintentfearandcontrol
AT kelseyhegarty aconceptualreevaluationofreproductivecoercioncentringintentfearandcontrol
AT lauratarzia conceptualreevaluationofreproductivecoercioncentringintentfearandcontrol
AT kelseyhegarty conceptualreevaluationofreproductivecoercioncentringintentfearandcontrol
_version_ 1721492421872713728