Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center

Background: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. Aim0 : The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neeta Singh, Varnit Toshyan, Sunesh Kumar, Perumal Vanamail, Malti Madhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2015;volume=8;issue=4;spage=218;epage=223;aulast=Singh
id doaj-8a4ee987c2a942d2baba3f7eb5696c3e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a4ee987c2a942d2baba3f7eb5696c3e2020-11-24T22:29:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662015-01-018421822310.4103/0974-1208.170401Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care centerNeeta SinghVarnit ToshyanSunesh KumarPerumal VanamailMalti MadhuBackground: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. Aim0 : The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients undergoing IVF-ET cycles. Design: Prospective randomized control trial. Methods and Material: Sixty infertile women with a history of >1 previous failed IVF-ET cycles were randomizedinto two groups of 30 each. The patients in group 1 underwent endometrial scratching once between days 14-21 of menstrual cycle in the cycle prior to embryo transfer (ET), while in group 2scratching were not done. Implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, abortion rate and live birth rate were comparedbetween both groups. Statistical Analysis: Mean values were compared between two groups using Student′s′t′ independent test. Frequency distributions of categorical variables were compared using Chi-Square/ Fisher′s exact test as appropriate. Results: Implantation rate in group 1 was 19.4% whereas in group 2 it was 8.1%. Difference between two groups was statistically significant (P =0.028). The live birth rate was higher in the group 2 compared to group 1, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.3% vs 10%, P =0.612). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the ongoing pregnancy rate (16.7% vs 0.0%; P =0.052), abortion rate (10.0% vs 3.3%, P =0.612) and miscarriage rate (6.7% vs 3.3%, P =0.99). Conclusions: Implantation rate increases significantly after endometrial scratching in patients with previous failed IVF-ET.http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2015;volume=8;issue=4;spage=218;epage=223;aulast=SinghEmbryo implantationendometrial injuryin-vitro fertilizationrepeated implantation failure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neeta Singh
Varnit Toshyan
Sunesh Kumar
Perumal Vanamail
Malti Madhu
spellingShingle Neeta Singh
Varnit Toshyan
Sunesh Kumar
Perumal Vanamail
Malti Madhu
Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Embryo implantation
endometrial injury
in-vitro fertilization
repeated implantation failure
author_facet Neeta Singh
Varnit Toshyan
Sunesh Kumar
Perumal Vanamail
Malti Madhu
author_sort Neeta Singh
title Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_short Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_full Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_fullStr Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_sort does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? a prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
issn 0974-1208
1998-4766
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Background: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. Aim0 : The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients undergoing IVF-ET cycles. Design: Prospective randomized control trial. Methods and Material: Sixty infertile women with a history of >1 previous failed IVF-ET cycles were randomizedinto two groups of 30 each. The patients in group 1 underwent endometrial scratching once between days 14-21 of menstrual cycle in the cycle prior to embryo transfer (ET), while in group 2scratching were not done. Implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, abortion rate and live birth rate were comparedbetween both groups. Statistical Analysis: Mean values were compared between two groups using Student′s′t′ independent test. Frequency distributions of categorical variables were compared using Chi-Square/ Fisher′s exact test as appropriate. Results: Implantation rate in group 1 was 19.4% whereas in group 2 it was 8.1%. Difference between two groups was statistically significant (P =0.028). The live birth rate was higher in the group 2 compared to group 1, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.3% vs 10%, P =0.612). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the ongoing pregnancy rate (16.7% vs 0.0%; P =0.052), abortion rate (10.0% vs 3.3%, P =0.612) and miscarriage rate (6.7% vs 3.3%, P =0.99). Conclusions: Implantation rate increases significantly after endometrial scratching in patients with previous failed IVF-ET.
topic Embryo implantation
endometrial injury
in-vitro fertilization
repeated implantation failure
url http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2015;volume=8;issue=4;spage=218;epage=223;aulast=Singh
work_keys_str_mv AT neetasingh doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
AT varnittoshyan doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
AT suneshkumar doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
AT perumalvanamail doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
AT maltimadhu doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
_version_ 1725744631376773120