Beyond Objects in Space-Time: Towards a Movement Analysis Framework with ‘How’ and ‘Why’ Elements

Current spatiotemporal data has facilitated movement studies to shift objectives from descriptive models to explanations of the underlying causes of movement. From both a practical and theoretical standpoint, progress in developing approaches for these explanations should be founded on a conceptual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saeed Rahimi, Antoni B. Moore, Peter A. Whigham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/3/190
id doaj-8a4e76a5d79e4b26878f526e15066c9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a4e76a5d79e4b26878f526e15066c9b2021-03-23T00:05:11ZengMDPI AGISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2220-99642021-03-011019019010.3390/ijgi10030190Beyond Objects in Space-Time: Towards a Movement Analysis Framework with ‘How’ and ‘Why’ ElementsSaeed Rahimi0Antoni B. Moore1Peter A. Whigham2School of Surveying, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New ZealandSchool of Surveying, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New ZealandDepartment of Information Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New ZealandCurrent spatiotemporal data has facilitated movement studies to shift objectives from descriptive models to explanations of the underlying causes of movement. From both a practical and theoretical standpoint, progress in developing approaches for these explanations should be founded on a conceptual model. This paper presents such a model in which three conceptual levels of abstraction are proposed to frame an agent-based representation of movement decision-making processes: ‘attribute,’ ‘actor,’ and ‘autonomous agent’. These in combination with three temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal general forms of observations distinguish nine (3x3) representation typologies of movement data within the agent framework. Thirdly, there are three levels of cognitive reasoning: ‘association,’ ‘intervention,’ and ‘counterfactual’. This makes for 27 possible types of operation embedded in a conceptual cube with the level of abstraction, type of observation, and degree of cognitive reasoning forming the three axes. The conceptual model is an arena where movement queries and the statement of relevant objectives takes place. An example implementation of a tightly constrained spatiotemporal scenario to ground the agent-structure was summarised. The platform has been well-defined so as to accommodate different tools and techniques to drive causal inference in computational movement analysis as an immediate future step.https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/3/190computational movement analysis, conceptual model, agent-based modelling, graphical causal models, intelligent agent
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saeed Rahimi
Antoni B. Moore
Peter A. Whigham
spellingShingle Saeed Rahimi
Antoni B. Moore
Peter A. Whigham
Beyond Objects in Space-Time: Towards a Movement Analysis Framework with ‘How’ and ‘Why’ Elements
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
computational movement analysis, conceptual model, agent-based modelling, graphical causal models, intelligent agent
author_facet Saeed Rahimi
Antoni B. Moore
Peter A. Whigham
author_sort Saeed Rahimi
title Beyond Objects in Space-Time: Towards a Movement Analysis Framework with ‘How’ and ‘Why’ Elements
title_short Beyond Objects in Space-Time: Towards a Movement Analysis Framework with ‘How’ and ‘Why’ Elements
title_full Beyond Objects in Space-Time: Towards a Movement Analysis Framework with ‘How’ and ‘Why’ Elements
title_fullStr Beyond Objects in Space-Time: Towards a Movement Analysis Framework with ‘How’ and ‘Why’ Elements
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Objects in Space-Time: Towards a Movement Analysis Framework with ‘How’ and ‘Why’ Elements
title_sort beyond objects in space-time: towards a movement analysis framework with ‘how’ and ‘why’ elements
publisher MDPI AG
series ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
issn 2220-9964
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Current spatiotemporal data has facilitated movement studies to shift objectives from descriptive models to explanations of the underlying causes of movement. From both a practical and theoretical standpoint, progress in developing approaches for these explanations should be founded on a conceptual model. This paper presents such a model in which three conceptual levels of abstraction are proposed to frame an agent-based representation of movement decision-making processes: ‘attribute,’ ‘actor,’ and ‘autonomous agent’. These in combination with three temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal general forms of observations distinguish nine (3x3) representation typologies of movement data within the agent framework. Thirdly, there are three levels of cognitive reasoning: ‘association,’ ‘intervention,’ and ‘counterfactual’. This makes for 27 possible types of operation embedded in a conceptual cube with the level of abstraction, type of observation, and degree of cognitive reasoning forming the three axes. The conceptual model is an arena where movement queries and the statement of relevant objectives takes place. An example implementation of a tightly constrained spatiotemporal scenario to ground the agent-structure was summarised. The platform has been well-defined so as to accommodate different tools and techniques to drive causal inference in computational movement analysis as an immediate future step.
topic computational movement analysis, conceptual model, agent-based modelling, graphical causal models, intelligent agent
url https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/3/190
work_keys_str_mv AT saeedrahimi beyondobjectsinspacetimetowardsamovementanalysisframeworkwithhowandwhyelements
AT antonibmoore beyondobjectsinspacetimetowardsamovementanalysisframeworkwithhowandwhyelements
AT peterawhigham beyondobjectsinspacetimetowardsamovementanalysisframeworkwithhowandwhyelements
_version_ 1724206922735812608