Bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparison

Objectives: This prospective, randomized, medium-term trial aimed to assess the efficiency, safety and postoperative results of bipolar plasma vaporization (BPV) in comparison with monopolar transurethral resection (TUR) in cases of secondary bladder neck sclerosis (BNS). Methods: A total of 70 pati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bogdan Geavlete, Cristian Moldoveanu, Catalin Iacoboaie, Petrisor Geavlete
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-04-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Urology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287212470695
id doaj-8a3bf9ef273244a0aaf750e17c870f23
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a3bf9ef273244a0aaf750e17c870f232020-11-25T03:15:42ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Urology1756-28721756-28802013-04-01510.1177/1756287212470695Bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparisonBogdan GeavleteCristian MoldoveanuCatalin IacoboaiePetrisor GeavleteObjectives: This prospective, randomized, medium-term trial aimed to assess the efficiency, safety and postoperative results of bipolar plasma vaporization (BPV) in comparison with monopolar transurethral resection (TUR) in cases of secondary bladder neck sclerosis (BNS). Methods: A total of 70 patients with BNS secondary to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; 46 cases), open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH; 18 cases) and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (6 cases) were enrolled in the trial. The inclusion criteria consisted of maximum flow rate ( Q max ) <10 ml/s and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >19. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after surgery by IPSS, quality of life score (QoL), Q max and postvoiding residual urinary volume (PVR). Results: The mean operation time (10.3 versus 14.9 minutes), catheterization period (0.75 versus 2.1 days) and hospital stay (1.1 versus 3.2 days) were significantly reduced in the BPV series. During the immediate postoperative follow up, recatheterization for acute urinary retention only occurred in the TUR series (5.7%). The medium-term retreatment requirements due to BNS recurrence were lower in the BPV study arm (2.8% versus 8.5%). At the 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months assessments, statistically similar parameters were found concerning the IPSS and QoL symptom scores, Q max and PVR values specific for the two therapeutic alternatives. Conclusions: BPV constitutes a valuable endoscopic treatment approach for secondary BNS. The method emphasized superior efficacy, a satisfactory safety profile and similar medium-term follow-up features when compared with standard TUR.https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287212470695
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bogdan Geavlete
Cristian Moldoveanu
Catalin Iacoboaie
Petrisor Geavlete
spellingShingle Bogdan Geavlete
Cristian Moldoveanu
Catalin Iacoboaie
Petrisor Geavlete
Bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparison
Therapeutic Advances in Urology
author_facet Bogdan Geavlete
Cristian Moldoveanu
Catalin Iacoboaie
Petrisor Geavlete
author_sort Bogdan Geavlete
title Bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparison
title_short Bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparison
title_full Bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparison
title_fullStr Bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparison
title_full_unstemmed Bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparison
title_sort bipolar plasma vaporization standard transurethral resection in secondary bladder neck sclerosis: a prospective, medium-term, randomized comparison
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Urology
issn 1756-2872
1756-2880
publishDate 2013-04-01
description Objectives: This prospective, randomized, medium-term trial aimed to assess the efficiency, safety and postoperative results of bipolar plasma vaporization (BPV) in comparison with monopolar transurethral resection (TUR) in cases of secondary bladder neck sclerosis (BNS). Methods: A total of 70 patients with BNS secondary to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; 46 cases), open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH; 18 cases) and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (6 cases) were enrolled in the trial. The inclusion criteria consisted of maximum flow rate ( Q max ) <10 ml/s and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >19. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after surgery by IPSS, quality of life score (QoL), Q max and postvoiding residual urinary volume (PVR). Results: The mean operation time (10.3 versus 14.9 minutes), catheterization period (0.75 versus 2.1 days) and hospital stay (1.1 versus 3.2 days) were significantly reduced in the BPV series. During the immediate postoperative follow up, recatheterization for acute urinary retention only occurred in the TUR series (5.7%). The medium-term retreatment requirements due to BNS recurrence were lower in the BPV study arm (2.8% versus 8.5%). At the 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months assessments, statistically similar parameters were found concerning the IPSS and QoL symptom scores, Q max and PVR values specific for the two therapeutic alternatives. Conclusions: BPV constitutes a valuable endoscopic treatment approach for secondary BNS. The method emphasized superior efficacy, a satisfactory safety profile and similar medium-term follow-up features when compared with standard TUR.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287212470695
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdangeavlete bipolarplasmavaporizationstandardtransurethralresectioninsecondarybladdernecksclerosisaprospectivemediumtermrandomizedcomparison
AT cristianmoldoveanu bipolarplasmavaporizationstandardtransurethralresectioninsecondarybladdernecksclerosisaprospectivemediumtermrandomizedcomparison
AT cataliniacoboaie bipolarplasmavaporizationstandardtransurethralresectioninsecondarybladdernecksclerosisaprospectivemediumtermrandomizedcomparison
AT petrisorgeavlete bipolarplasmavaporizationstandardtransurethralresectioninsecondarybladdernecksclerosisaprospectivemediumtermrandomizedcomparison
_version_ 1724637910179774464