Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.

Gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GE EPI) is the most commonly used approach to assess localized blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal changes in real-time. Alternatively, real-time spin-echo single-voxel spectroscopy (SE SVS) has recently been introduced for spatially specific BOLD neurofeedb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yury Koush, Mark A Elliott, Frank Scharnowski, Klaus Mathiak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24614912/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-8a28c4fe51c041f78d16c104205b69f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a28c4fe51c041f78d16c104205b69f92021-03-04T11:56:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0193e9162010.1371/journal.pone.0091620Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.Yury KoushMark A ElliottFrank ScharnowskiKlaus MathiakGradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GE EPI) is the most commonly used approach to assess localized blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal changes in real-time. Alternatively, real-time spin-echo single-voxel spectroscopy (SE SVS) has recently been introduced for spatially specific BOLD neurofeedback at 3 T and at 7 T. However, currently it is not known how neurofeedback based on real-time SE SVS compares to real-time GE EPI-based. We therefore compared both methods at high (3 T) and at ultra-high (7 T) magnetic field strengths. We evaluated standard quality measures of both methods for signals originating from the motor cortex, the visual cortex, and for a neurofeedback condition. At 3 T, the data quality of the real-time SE SVS and GE EPI R2* estimates were comparable. At 7 T, the data quality of the real-time GE EPI acquisitions was superior compared to those of the real-time SE SVS. Despite the somehow lower data quality of real-time SE SVS compared to GE EPI at 7 T, SE SVS acquisitions might still be an interesting alternative. Real-time SE SVS allows for a direct and subject-specific T2* estimation and thus for a physiologically more plausible neurofeedback signal.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24614912/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yury Koush
Mark A Elliott
Frank Scharnowski
Klaus Mathiak
spellingShingle Yury Koush
Mark A Elliott
Frank Scharnowski
Klaus Mathiak
Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yury Koush
Mark A Elliott
Frank Scharnowski
Klaus Mathiak
author_sort Yury Koush
title Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.
title_short Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.
title_full Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.
title_fullStr Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.
title_sort comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the bold effect at 3 t and at 7 t.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GE EPI) is the most commonly used approach to assess localized blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal changes in real-time. Alternatively, real-time spin-echo single-voxel spectroscopy (SE SVS) has recently been introduced for spatially specific BOLD neurofeedback at 3 T and at 7 T. However, currently it is not known how neurofeedback based on real-time SE SVS compares to real-time GE EPI-based. We therefore compared both methods at high (3 T) and at ultra-high (7 T) magnetic field strengths. We evaluated standard quality measures of both methods for signals originating from the motor cortex, the visual cortex, and for a neurofeedback condition. At 3 T, the data quality of the real-time SE SVS and GE EPI R2* estimates were comparable. At 7 T, the data quality of the real-time GE EPI acquisitions was superior compared to those of the real-time SE SVS. Despite the somehow lower data quality of real-time SE SVS compared to GE EPI at 7 T, SE SVS acquisitions might still be an interesting alternative. Real-time SE SVS allows for a direct and subject-specific T2* estimation and thus for a physiologically more plausible neurofeedback signal.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24614912/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT yurykoush comparisonofrealtimewaterprotonspectroscopyandechoplanarimagingsensitivitytotheboldeffectat3tandat7t
AT markaelliott comparisonofrealtimewaterprotonspectroscopyandechoplanarimagingsensitivitytotheboldeffectat3tandat7t
AT frankscharnowski comparisonofrealtimewaterprotonspectroscopyandechoplanarimagingsensitivitytotheboldeffectat3tandat7t
AT klausmathiak comparisonofrealtimewaterprotonspectroscopyandechoplanarimagingsensitivitytotheboldeffectat3tandat7t
_version_ 1714803231191728128