Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design

This paper extends prior work establishing an operationalized framework of mathematical sense making (MSM) in physics. The framework differentiates between the object being understood (either physical or mathematical) and various tools (physical or mathematical) used to mediate the sense-making proc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian D. Gifford, Noah D. Finkelstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2021-05-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010138
id doaj-8a27a8bf74cb4c8ba4bc33cb2adfff0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a27a8bf74cb4c8ba4bc33cb2adfff0e2021-05-24T14:54:51ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962021-05-0117101013810.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010138Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum designJulian D. GiffordNoah D. FinkelsteinThis paper extends prior work establishing an operationalized framework of mathematical sense making (MSM) in physics. The framework differentiates between the object being understood (either physical or mathematical) and various tools (physical or mathematical) used to mediate the sense-making process. This results in four modes of MSM that can be coordinated and linked in various ways. Here, the framework is applied to novel modalities of student written work (both short answer and multiple choice). In detailed studies of student reasoning about the photoelectric effect, we associate these MSM modes with particular multiple choice answers, and substantiate this association by linking both the MSM modes and multiple choice answers with finer-grained reasoning elements that students use in solving a specific problem. Through the multiple associations between MSM mode, distributions of reasoning elements, and multiple-choice answers, we confirm the applicability of this framework to analyzing these sparser modalities of student work and its utility for analyzing larger-scale (N>100) datasets. The association between individual reasoning elements and both MSM modes and MC answers suggest that it is possible to cue particular modes of student reasoning and answer selection. Such findings suggest potential for this framework to be applicable to the analysis and design of curriculum.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010138
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julian D. Gifford
Noah D. Finkelstein
spellingShingle Julian D. Gifford
Noah D. Finkelstein
Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
Physical Review Physics Education Research
author_facet Julian D. Gifford
Noah D. Finkelstein
author_sort Julian D. Gifford
title Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_short Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_full Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_fullStr Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_full_unstemmed Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_sort applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
issn 2469-9896
publishDate 2021-05-01
description This paper extends prior work establishing an operationalized framework of mathematical sense making (MSM) in physics. The framework differentiates between the object being understood (either physical or mathematical) and various tools (physical or mathematical) used to mediate the sense-making process. This results in four modes of MSM that can be coordinated and linked in various ways. Here, the framework is applied to novel modalities of student written work (both short answer and multiple choice). In detailed studies of student reasoning about the photoelectric effect, we associate these MSM modes with particular multiple choice answers, and substantiate this association by linking both the MSM modes and multiple choice answers with finer-grained reasoning elements that students use in solving a specific problem. Through the multiple associations between MSM mode, distributions of reasoning elements, and multiple-choice answers, we confirm the applicability of this framework to analyzing these sparser modalities of student work and its utility for analyzing larger-scale (N>100) datasets. The association between individual reasoning elements and both MSM modes and MC answers suggest that it is possible to cue particular modes of student reasoning and answer selection. Such findings suggest potential for this framework to be applicable to the analysis and design of curriculum.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010138
work_keys_str_mv AT juliandgifford applyingamathematicalsensemakingframeworktostudentworkanditspotentialforcurriculumdesign
AT noahdfinkelstein applyingamathematicalsensemakingframeworktostudentworkanditspotentialforcurriculumdesign
_version_ 1721428575688589312